Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Dec 7;22(1):209-227.
doi: 10.1007/s40201-023-00888-5. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Optimization of divalent mercury removal from synthetic wastewater using desirability function in central composite design of response surface methodology

Affiliations

Optimization of divalent mercury removal from synthetic wastewater using desirability function in central composite design of response surface methodology

Jonas Bayuo et al. J Environ Health Sci Eng. .

Abstract

Heavy metals exist in the ecosystem both naturally and due to anthropogenic activities and as recalcitrant pollutants; they are non-biodegradable and cause acute and chronic diseases to human beings and many lifeforms. A statistical experimental approach was applied in this current study to optimize the detoxification of mercury [Hg(II)] from mono-component biosorption system by a novel hybrid granular activated carbon (biosorbent) prepared from maize plant residues. The analysis of variance by the application of central composite design shows that all the studied independent factors greatly influence Hg(II) removal efficiency and uptake capacity. The optimum experimental condition of 30 min contact time, 0.5 g/L biosorbent dosage, and 15 mg/L initial Hg(II) concentration were achieved after seeking 20 optimization solutions at 0.903 desirability. The optimum percentage removal and uptake capacity of Hg(II) at the optimal experimental setup was 96.7% and 10.8 mg/g, respectively. To confirm the quadratic models developed for the prediction of the responses as a function of the independent factors, confirmatory laboratory experiments were performed at the optimum condition. The results show that at the established best experimental condition, the optimum Hg(II) removal efficiency of 98.3% and uptake capacity of 11.2 mg/g were attained, which were within the prediction intervals indicating the suitability of the quadratic models in predicting future cases. The TEM and XRD analyses show that the Hg(II) ions were adsorbed by the biosorbent successfully and this suggests the potential and applicability of this novel biosorbent in treating water contaminants, especially heavy metals.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40201-023-00888-5.

Keywords: Biosorption; Mercury; Modeling; Optimization; Response surface; Wastewater.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A flow diagram summarizing the entire experimental steps in the study methodology
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
TEM images of the biosorbent before (a) and after the biosorption of Hg(II) ions (b)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
XRD spectra of the biosorbent before (a) and after the biosorption of Hg(II) ions (b)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Contact time effect on the sequestration of Hg(II) ions by the biosorbent
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Effect of biosorbent dosage on removal efficiency and biosorption capacity of Hg(II) ions by the biosorbent
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Influence of initial Hg(II) concentration on the decontamination of Hg(II) ions by the biosorbent
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Perturbation plots for independent factors as a function of removal efficiency (a) and biosorption capacity (b)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Main effect of different factors on Hg(II) removal efficiency (a, b, c) and uptake capacity (d, e, f) of Hg(II)
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Interactive effect of factors A and B on Hg(II) removal efficiency (a) and uptake capacity (b)
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Interactive effect of factors A and C on Hg(II) removal efficiency (a) and biosorption capacity (b)
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Interactive effect of factors B-C on Hg(II) removal efficiency (a) and biosorption capacity (b)
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Desirability ramps containing optimum operating conditions and responses

Similar articles

References

    1. Zeng H, Yu Y, Wang F, Zhang J, Li D. Arsenic(V) removal by granular adsorbents made from water treatment residuals materials and chitosan. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp. 2020;585:1–10. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124036.
    1. Lamzougui G, Es-Said A, Nafai H, Chafik D, Bouhaouss A, Bchitou R. Optimization and modeling of Pb(II) adsorption from aqueous solution onto phosphogypsum by application of response surface methodology. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat Elem. 2021;196(6):521–9. 10.1080/10426507.2020.1860985.
    1. Kavitha V, Palanivelu K. Spectrophotometric determination of trace amounts of arsenic in sediment, flyash and water samples. Int J ChemTech Res. 2014;7(5):2333–40. https://sphinxsai.com/2015/ch_vol7_no5/3/-(2333-2340)V7N5.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2021.
    1. Hashemi SA, Mousavi SM, Ramakrishna S. Effective removal of mercury, arsenic and lead from aqueous media using Polyaniline-Fe3O4- silver diethyldithiocarbamate nanostructures. J Clean Prod. 2019;239:1–15. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118023.
    1. Vega-Páez JD, Rivas RE, Dussán-Garzón J. High efficiency mercury sorption by dead biomass of Lysinibacillus sphaericus-new insights into the treatment of contaminated water. Mater (Basel). 2019;12(8):1–13. 10.3390/ma12081296. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources