Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024;44(6):59.
doi: 10.1007/s13593-024-00983-3. Epub 2024 Nov 7.

Transitions to crop residue burning have multiple antecedents in Eastern India

Affiliations

Transitions to crop residue burning have multiple antecedents in Eastern India

E Urban Cordeiro et al. Agron Sustain Dev. 2024.

Abstract

Far removed from the agricultural fire "hotspots" of Northwestern India, rice residue burning is on the rise in Eastern India with implications for regional air quality and agricultural sustainability. The underlying drivers contributing to the increase in burning have been linked to the adoption of mechanized (combine) harvesting but, in general, are inadequately understood. We hypothesize that the adoption of burning as a management practice results from a set of socio-technical interactions rather than emerging from a single factor. Using a mixed methods approach, a household survey (n = 475) provided quantitative insights into landscape and farm-scale drivers of burning and was complemented by an in-depth qualitative survey (n = 36) to characterize decision processes and to verify causal inferences derived from the broader survey. For communities where the combine harvester is present, our results show that rice residue burning is not inevitable. The decision to burn appears to emerge from a cascading sequence of events, starting with the following: (1) decreasing household labor, leading to (2) decreasing household livestock holdings, resulting in (3) reduced demands for residue fodder, incentivizing (4) adoption of labor-efficient combine harvesting and subsequent burning of loose residues that are both difficult to collect and of lower feeding value than manually harvested straw. Local demand for crop residues for livestock feeding plays a central role mediating transitions to burning. Consequently, policy response options that only consider the role of the combine harvester are likely to be ineffective. Innovative strategies such as the creation of decentralized commercial models for dairy value chains may bolster local residue demand by addressing household-scale labor bottlenecks to maintaining livestock. Secondary issues, such as timely rice planting, merit consideration as part of holistic responses to "bend" agricultural burning trajectories in Eastern India towards more sustainable practices.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13593-024-00983-3.

Keywords: Air quality; Bihar; Crop burning; Indo-Gangetic Plain; Mixed crop-livestock systems; Mixed methods; Socio-technical drivers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Buxar, Bihar, showing partially burnt rice residue with zero-till wheat sowing is in progress (PC: Anurag Ajay)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) remotely sensed fire observations during rice harvest season in Bihar (Urban Cordeiro et al. 2023).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Livelihood Platforms Approach. Adapted from Brown et al. (2017).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Variable importance plot of random forest model to predict burn likelihood. Units are the increase in mean square error (MSE) if the predictor was randomized
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Partial dependency plots of random forest model to predict burn likelihood. Note that “yhat” indicates the predicted burn likelihood based on the values of the predictor variables included in the model
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Single regression tree example for residue burning probability to visualize interactions embedded in the random forest model predictions. The values in the nodes indicate the mean of the target variable (i.e., burn likelihood) within the number of observations. For example, in the first node (i.e., root), the mean value of 0.0961 is derived from 402 observations
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Conceptual model of factors influencing rice harvest and residue management

References

    1. Acosta M, van Wessel M, van Bommel S et al (2020) What does it mean to make a ‘joint’ decision? Unpacking intra-household decision making in agriculture: implications for policy and practice. J Dev Stud 56:1210–1229. 10.1080/00220388.2019.1650169
    1. Ajay A, Craufurd P, Sharma S et al (2022) Large-scale data of crop production practices applied by farmers on their largest rice plot during 2018 in eight Indian states. CIMMYT Research Data & Software Repository Network https://hdl.handle.net/11529/10548656. Accessed 17 Jan 2022
    1. Bajracharya SB, Mishra A, Maharjan A (2021) Determinants of crop residue burning practice in the Terai region of Nepal. PLoS ONE 16:1–13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0253939 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balwinder-Singh MAJ, Kumar V et al (2019a) Taking the climate risk out of transplanted and direct seeded rice: insights from dynamic simulation in Eastern India. Field Crops Res 239:92–103. 10.1016/J.FCR.2019.05.014 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balwinder-Singh MAJ, Srivastava AK, Gerard B (2019b) Tradeoffs between groundwater conservation and air pollution from agricultural fires in northwest India. Nat Sustain 2:580–583. 10.1038/s41893-019-0304-4

LinkOut - more resources