Right anterior thoracotomy vs. upper hemisternotomy for aortic valve replacement with Perceval S: is there a difference?
- PMID: 39526183
- PMCID: PMC11543525
- DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1369204
Right anterior thoracotomy vs. upper hemisternotomy for aortic valve replacement with Perceval S: is there a difference?
Abstract
Background: Our study aimed to evaluate the early outcomes of aortic valve replacement with Perceval S sutureless valve through the right anterior thoracotomy and upper hemisternotomy approaches, and to determine if there are any differences between these two approaches.
Methods: We carried out a study using data from 174 patients who underwent minimally invasive Perceval S valve implantation for aortic valve stenosis between January 2018 and August 2023. This was a retrospective, single-center observational study. The patients were divided into two groups: the hemisternotomy group (n = 100) and the right anterior thoracotomy group (n = 74).
Results: The overall in-hospital mortality was 1,7%. The cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were longer in the right anterior thoracotomy group (p < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of stroke, paravalvular leak, mechanical ventilation time, blood transfusion requirements, pacemaker implantation, reexploration for bleeding, conversion, wound infection, or in-hospital stay. Postoperative chest drainage was lower (p < .001) and postoperative atrial fibrillation occurred less frequently (p = .044) in the right anterior thoracotomy group. The median intensive care unit stay was shorter in the right anterior thoracotomy group (p = .018).
Conclusion: Aortic valve replacement with the Perceval S valve through either an upper hemisternotomy or a right anterior thoracotomy is a procedure associated with low perioperative complication rates. Right anterior thoracotomy for an aortic valve replacement with the Perceval S valve was associated with lower postoperative bleeding, a lower postoperative atrial fibrillation incidence and a shorter intensive care unit stay compared to upper hemistornotomy.
Keywords: aortic valve replacement; hemisternotomy; minimally invasive; sutureless valve; thoracotomy.
© 2024 Okiljevic, Raickovic, Zivkovic, Vukovic, Milicic, Stojanovic, Milacic and Micovic.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with a sutureless valve through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):960-5. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv210. Epub 2015 Jun 25. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016. PMID: 26113005
-
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Perceval S sutureless valve: early outcomes and one-year survival from two European centers.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2838-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.085. Epub 2014 Mar 4. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24698558
-
Right anterior mini thoracotomy approach for isolated aortic valve replacement: Early outcomes at a Canadian center.J Card Surg. 2021 Jul;36(7):2365-2372. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15571. Epub 2021 May 18. J Card Surg. 2021. PMID: 34002895
-
Current era minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: techniques and practice.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.086. Epub 2013 Nov 1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014. PMID: 24183904 Review.
-
Benefits and Pitfalls of the Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthesis.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 5;8:789392. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.789392. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35071358 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Short-Term Outcomes of Partial Upper Ministernotomy for Aortic Valve Replacement Within the Learning Curve Context.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jul 1;12(7):254. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12070254. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025. PMID: 40710779 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Perceval Valves in Older Patients: A Systematic Review.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jul 28;26(7):39463. doi: 10.31083/RCM39463. eCollection 2025 Jul. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025. PMID: 40776953 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rosengart TK, Feldman T, Borger MA, Vassiliades TA, Jr, Gilinov AM, Hoercher KJ, et al. Percutaneous and minimally invasive valve procedures: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia, council on clinical cardiology, functional genomics and translational biology interdisciplinary working group, and quality of care and outcomes research interdisciplinary working group. Circulation. (2008) 117:1750–67. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.188525 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources