Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 31:3:14.
doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0014. eCollection 2023.

In vitro regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Caragana korshinskii

Affiliations

In vitro regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Caragana korshinskii

Bin Liu et al. For Res (Fayettev). .

Abstract

Caragana korshinskii is a deciduous shrub with large eco-economic value and strong tolerance to abiotic stresses. However, the shortage of reliable genetic transformation technology severely hinders its research on stress tolerance mechanisms and stress-resistant gene mining and application. In this study, the embryonic tip of the C. korshinskii seedling was used as the initiating explant to get regenerated plant through the direct organogenesis pathway, which significantly shortened the culture cycle and set the foundation for investigation of Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation. Our results suggest that the embryonic tip possesses robust meristem capacity and is an efficient method for transgenic breeding. This research provides a technical basis for asexual reproduction, molecular breeding, and gene function investigation in C. korshinskii by establishing, for the first time, an effective in vitro regeneration system and an Agrobacterium-mediated stable genetic transformation system utilizing the embryonic tip of C. korshinskii as explants.

Keywords: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation; Embryonic tip; Caragana korshinskii; Organogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The enlarged embryonic tip explants after pre-treatment of the seeds of C. korshinskii. (a) Freshly sterilized seeds of C. korshinskii. (b) - (d) Embryonic tip explant preparation. (e) The 'enlarged' explants. (f), (g) Comparison of the phenotype of the germinating seeds between untreated (the upper panel of the photographs) and cytokinin-treated ones (the lower panel of photographs). Bar = 2 mm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The complete process of the regeneration system from embryonic tip of C. korshinskii in vitro. (a) Pre-treated germinating seeds of C. korshinskii. (b) The embryonic tips begin to turn green and to enlarge. (c) Adventitious buds induction after priming. (d) Successful induction of adventitious buds. (e) 'Storm-like' adventitious buds. (f) First step elongation of the adventitious buds. (g) Second step elongation of the adventitious buds. (h) Adventitious roots induction. (i) Healthy seedlings after transferring into soil for 40 d. Bar = 1 cm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of cefotaxime, kanamycin and hygromycin on growth of explants. (a) Growth status of the embryonic tips in response to different concentrations of cefotaxime. (b) Growth status of the embryonic tips after being treated with various concentrations of kanamycin. (c) Growth status of the regenerated shoots under gradient concentrations of kanamycin. (d) Growth status of the embryonic tips after being treated with various concentrations of hygromycin.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic illustration of embryonic tip transformation system and GUS staining results in C. korshinskii. In the schematic of genetic transformation ((a)−(j), upper panel), the plumule is removed from the red line. (k) Pictures of GUS staining from the un-transformed calli and buds. (l) Pictures of GUS staining from the transformed calli and buds.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Accumulation of betalain in transgenic C. korshinskii buds and PCR detection of the RUBY and CiDREB1C genes. (a) Phenotype of RUBY-positive buds, as indicated by the red arrows. (b) CiDREB1C transgenic plants and the negative control (WT). (c) Eletrophoresis results of the PCR products from RUBY in the positive transgenic buds; Lane R1-R5, the PCR products from the five segments of RUBY. M, molecular weight marker (DL5000). (d) Electrophoresis results of the PCR products from CiDREB1C in the positive transgenic seedlings and wild type control; M, molecular weight marker (DL2000). Lane 1: negative control, PCR products for the Kan gene (lane 2), the NOS terminator (lane 3), and the CaMV35S promoter (lane 4).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang Z, Gao H Progress on genetic diversity of genus Caragana germplasm resources. Journal of Plant Genetic Resource. 2008;9:397–400.
    1. Zhao Y Taxonomic studies on the genus Caragana from China. Journal of Inner Mongolia Uniwersity. 1993;24:631–53.
    1. Niu X Suggestions on vigorously develop Caragana forest in northwest China. Inner Mongolian Animal Husbandry Sciences. 1999;1999(1):20–24.
    1. LI J, Xie L, Ren J, Gong C Functional analysis of CkPHB gene regulation xylem development and enhancing plant drought resistance in Caragana korshinskii. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalla Sinica. 2021;41:1259–66.
    1. Guan JL, Ma CC The research progress of Caragana species during the 21st century. Acta AgrestiaSinica. 2014;22:697–705.

LinkOut - more resources