Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;104(1):194-202.
doi: 10.1111/aogs.15005. Epub 2024 Nov 11.

May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study

Joanna Frykman  1   2 , Emelie Nilsson  1   2 , Eva Wiberg-Itzel  1   2 , Tove Wallstrom  1   2
Affiliations

May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study

Joanna Frykman et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Cesarean sections are increasing worldwide and are associated with altered risks of complications for both mother and child. Vaginal birth after cesarean section is associated with lower maternal and neonatal morbidity than in repeat cesarean section. Only a few studies have considered the indication for the previous cesarean section to be of importance for the outcome of subsequent labor. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the indication for a previous cesarean section affects the outcomes at a subsequent delivery in women with induction of labor.

Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study of the four largest delivery units in Stockholm during 2012-2015 included 1150 women with one previous cesarean section with induction of labor.

Inclusion criteria: women with induced labor and a previous cesarean section, singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation, gestational age of ≥34 weeks. The women were grouped by indication for the previous cesarean section.

Primary outcome: mode of delivery (vaginal birth after previous cesarean section or repeat cesarean section).

Secondary outcomes: induction to delivery time, postpartum hemorrhage, uterine rupture. Neonatal outcomes: birth weight, Apgar score <7, arterial umbilical cord blood gas pH <7.0.

Results: Our study found that the indication of labor dystocia at the previous cesarean section, increased the risk of repeat cesarean section (aOR 5.35; 95% CI: 1.64-17.50) in women with induction of labor. Other risk factors for repeat cesarean section were birth weight >4000 g, maternal BMI ≥30 or if vaginal prostaglandin was used as the method for induction of labor. A previous vaginal delivery and use of oxytocin increased the chance of a vaginal delivery in this group of women.

Conclusions: Our study showed that the indication for the previous cesarean section affects the outcome in the subsequent delivery in women with induction of labor. If the indication for the previous cesarean section was labor dystocia, the risk of repeat cesarean section was increased.

Keywords: TOLAC; VBAC; induction of labor; labor dystocia; previous vaginal delivery; repeat cesarean section.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of the study. *Deliveries in Stockholm between 2012‐2015 as numbers and percentages.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Cheng YW, Eden KB, Marshall N, Pereira L, Caughey AB, Guise JM. Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality. Clin Perinatol. 2011;38:297‐309. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Place K, Kruit H, Tekay A, Heinonen S, Rahkonen L. Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:176. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Network Ep . European Perinatal Health Report Core indicators of the health and care of pregnant women and babies in Europe from 2015 to 2019. https://www.europeristat.com/images/Euro‐Peristat_Fact_sheets_2022_for_u...: Euro peristat 2022.
    1. Jackson S, Fleege L, Fridman M, Gregory K, Zelop C, Olsen J. Morbidity following primary cesarean delivery in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(139):e1‐e5. - PubMed
    1. Qiu L, Zhu J, Lu X. The safety of trial of labor after cesarean section (TOLAC) versus elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS): a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023;36:2214831. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources