Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov 11;120(6):1268-1274.
doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003195.

Optical Polyp Diagnosis in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Roupen Djinbachian  1   2 , Douglas K Rex  3 , Daniel von Renteln  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Optical Polyp Diagnosis in the Era of Artificial Intelligence

Roupen Djinbachian et al. Am J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

The development of new image enhancement modalities and improved endoscopic imaging quality has not led to increased adoption of resect-and-discard in routine practice. Studies have shown that endoscopists have the capacity to achieve quality thresholds to perform optical diagnosis; however, this has not led to acceptance of optical diagnosis as a replacement for pathology for diminutive (1-5 mm) polyps. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer-assisted characterization of diminutive polyps has recently emerged as a strategy that could potentially represent a breakthrough technology to enable widespread adoption of resect-and-discard. Recent evidence suggests that pathology-based diagnosis is suboptimal, as polyp nonretrieval, fragmentation, sectioning errors, incorrect diagnosis as "normal mucosa," and interpathologist variability limit the efficacy of pathology for the diagnosis of 1-5 mm polyps. New paradigms in performing polyp diagnosis with or without AI have emerged to compete with pathology in terms of efficacy. Strategies, such as autonomous AI, AI-assisted human diagnosis, AI-unassisted human diagnosis, and combined strategies have been proposed as potential paradigms for resect-and-discard, although further research is still required to determine the optimal strategy. Implementation studies with high patient acceptance, where polyps are truly being discarded without histologic diagnosis, are paving the way toward normalizing resect-and-discard in routine clinical practice. Ultimately the largest challenges for computer-assisted characterization remain liability perceptions from endoscopists. The potential benefits of AI-based resect-and-discard are many, with very little potential harm. Real-world implementation studies are therefore required to pave the way for the acceptability of such strategies in routine practice.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; colorectal polyps; optical diagnosis; resect-and-discard.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Vleugels JLA, Hassan C, Senore C, et al. Diminutive polyps with advanced histologic features do not increase risk for metachronous advanced colon neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2019;156(3):623–34.e3.
    1. Djinbachian R, Marchand E, Pohl H, et al. Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: A randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic image-enhancing modalities. Gastrointest Endosc 2021;93(3):712–9.e1.
    1. Djinbachian R, Dubé AJ, von Renteln D. Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps: Recent developments. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2019;17(1):99–114.
    1. Rex DK, Kahi C, O'Brien M, et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and incorporation of valuable endoscopic innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73(3):419–22.
    1. Kuiper T, van den Broek FJ, Naber AH, et al. Endoscopic trimodal imaging detects colonic neoplasia as well as standard video endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2011;140(7):1887–94.

LinkOut - more resources