Dropout in a Longitudinal Survey of Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers With Low Back Pain: Observational Study
- PMID: 39527103
- PMCID: PMC11589496
- DOI: 10.2196/58771
Dropout in a Longitudinal Survey of Amazon Mechanical Turk Workers With Low Back Pain: Observational Study
Abstract
Background: Surveys of internet panels such as Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) are common in health research. Nonresponse in longitudinal studies can limit inferences about change over time.
Objective: This study aimed to (1) describe the patterns of survey responses and nonresponse among MTurk members with back pain, (2) identify factors associated with survey response over time, (3) assess the impact of nonresponse on sample characteristics, and (4) assess how well inverse probability weighting can account for differences in sample composition.
Methods: We surveyed adult MTurk workers who identified as having back pain. We report participation trends over 3 survey waves and use stepwise logistic regression to identify factors related to survey participation in successive waves.
Results: A total of 1678 adults participated in wave 1. Of those, 983 (59%) participated in wave 2 and 703 (42%) in wave 3. Participants who did not drop out took less time to complete previous surveys (30 min vs 35 min in wave 1, P<.001; 24 min vs 26 min in wave 2, P=.02) and reported having fewer health conditions (5.88 vs 6.6, P<.001). In multivariate models predicting responding at wave 2, lower odds of participation were associated with more time to complete the baseline survey (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99), being Hispanic (compared with non-Hispanic, OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.96), having a bachelor's degree as their terminal degree (compared with all other levels of education, OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.73), having more pain interference and intensity (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.89), and having more health conditions. In contrast, older respondents (older than 45 years age compared with 18-24 years age) were more likely to respond to the wave 2 survey (OR 2.63 and 3.79, respectively) and those whose marital status was divorced (OR 1.81) and separated (OR 1.77) were also more likely to respond to the wave 2 survey. Weighted analysis showed slight differences in sample demographics and conditions and larger differences in pain assessments, particularly for those who responded to wave 2.
Conclusions: Longitudinal studies on MTurk have large, differential dropouts between waves. This study provided information about the individuals more likely to drop out over time, which can help researchers prepare for future surveys.
Keywords: Amazon; MTurk; Mechanical Turk; chronic low back pain; manual labor; occupational health; survey attrition; survey weights.
©Nabeel Qureshi, Ron D Hays, Patricia M Herman. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 11.11.2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Effects of Excluding Those Who Report Having "Syndomitis" or "Chekalism" on Data Quality: Longitudinal Health Survey of a Sample From Amazon's Mechanical Turk.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 4;25:e46421. doi: 10.2196/46421. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37540543 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Health Survey Data Cost and Quality Between Amazon's Mechanical Turk and Ipsos' KnowledgePanel: Observational Study.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 29;26:e63032. doi: 10.2196/63032. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39612505 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the Recruitment of Research Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain Using Amazon Mechanical Turk With the Recruitment of Patients From Chiropractic Clinics: A Quasi-Experimental Study.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Oct;44(8):601-611. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Jun 18. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021. PMID: 35728997 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Amazon's Mechanical Turk Platform to Conventional Data Collection Methods in the Health and Medical Research Literature.J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):533-538. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4246-0. Epub 2018 Jan 4. J Gen Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29302882 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Concerns and recommendations for using Amazon MTurk for eating disorder research.Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Feb;55(2):263-272. doi: 10.1002/eat.23614. Epub 2021 Sep 25. Int J Eat Disord. 2022. PMID: 34562036 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Mortensen K, Hughes TL. Comparing Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform to conventional data collection methods in the health and medical research literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):533–538. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4246-0. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29302882 10.1007/s11606-017-4246-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Aguinis H, Villamor I, Ramani RS. MTurk research: review and recommendations. Journal of Management. 2020 Nov 19;47(4):823–837. doi: 10.1177/0149206320969787. - DOI
-
- Zhang B, Gearhart S. Collecting Online Survey Data: A Comparison of Data Quality among a Commercial Panel & MTurk. Surv Pract. 2020;13(1):1–10. doi: 10.29115/sp-2020-0015. - DOI