Do Women with Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Receive Optimal First-Line Treatment?

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: There is scant knowledge on previous pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in women with urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) referred to hospitals. We hypothesized that women with predominately UI and POP had not received optimal primary care conservative management.

Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey among women attending a gynecological outpatient's clinic. The questionnaire included questions about demographics, PFMT dosage, whether ability to contract had been assessed and whether the patients had used precontraction before increase in intra-abdominal pressure ("the knack").

Results: One hundred two women, mean age 52.5 (SD 13.4) years, responded; 37.3% had never been treated previously. There was no statistically significant difference in age, BMI, level of education, parity, time since last birth, SUI, or POP between the women who had been treated conservatively or not before the hospital visit. Thirty-three percent had trained with a physiotherapist and > 35% reported that their ability to contract had not been assessed or were unsure whether it had been assessed; 37% were not able to stop their urine stream; 52% reported that they performed "the knack," with 15.7% reporting it to be effective. Reasons for not having trained the PFM before visiting the hospital included not being motivated, not knowing how to do PFMT, not being told/advised to do PFMT and not believing PFMT would help.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that there is a need for improvement within first-line health care service for women with predominately UI and POP.

Keywords: Conservative treatment; Health care delivery; Knowledge; Pelvic floor muscle training; Physiotherapy; Surgery.