Increased oscillation rate may improve morcellation efficiency in HoLEP
- PMID: 39527488
- PMCID: PMC11879268
- DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.8873
Increased oscillation rate may improve morcellation efficiency in HoLEP
Abstract
Introduction: Tissue morcellation has become increasingly efficient, yet remains a rate-limiting step in holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Limited data exists on how the rate of oscillation by the morcellator blades affects morcellation efficiency (ME).
Methods: We undertook a retrospective review of HoLEP procedures performed by two surgeons from July 1, 2019, to August 25, 2022. All morcellation was performed with the Wolf Piranha device and enucleation was performed with Moses 2.0 technology. Surgeon 1 routinely uses 1500 oscillations/min (low rate [LR]) and surgeon 2 uses a rate of 6000 oscillations/min (high rate [HR]). These rates were confirmed upon electronic medical record review of each case. The primary endpoint was ME (g/minute). Secondary endpoints included enucleation efficiency (EE), mean tissue specimen weight, and preoperative prostate volume.
Results: A total of 894 HoLEPs were analyzed, 592 by surgeon 1 and 302 by surgeon 2. Surgeon 1 had larger preoperative prostate volumes (126 vs. 101, p<0.001) and specimen tissue weights (86.0 vs. 61.1, p<0.001). EE was higher in the LR group (1.67 vs. 1.33 g/min, p<0.001). Morcellation time was longer in the LR group (11.3 vs. 6.09 min, p<0.001) and ME was lower in the LR group (9.26 vs. 12.1 g/min, p<0.001). The difference in ME was inversely proportional to specimen weight.
Conclusions: Increased oscillation rate during morcellation may lead to decrease in morcellation time and increased ME during prostate enucleation. The primary limitation of this paper is the inclusion of only two surgeons. Future studies will serve to evaluate this finding across a larger number of institutions, and evaluate ways to increase ME in large prostate cohorts.
Conflict of interest statement
COMPETING INTERESTS: Dr. Slade is a consultant for Cook Medical. Dr. Rivera is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Cook Medical. The remaining authors do not report any competing personal or financial interests related to this work.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Wolf Piranha vs Storz Prostate Morcellation Devices: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Study.J Endourol. 2021 Nov;35(11):1671-1674. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0541. J Endourol. 2021. PMID: 34128395
-
Morcellation Efficiency in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Oscillating Morcellator Outperforms Reciprocating Morcellator With no Apparent Learning Curve.Urology. 2017 Aug;106:173-177. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 19. Urology. 2017. PMID: 28532766
-
Ex Vivo Comparison of Efficiency, Safety, and Surgeon Satisfaction in Four Commercial Morcellators.J Endourol. 2022 Apr;36(4):514-521. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0573. Epub 2021 Dec 3. J Endourol. 2022. PMID: 34779660
-
Morcellation After Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate: Efficiency and Safety of Currently Available Devices.Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Mar;8(2):532-544. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Apr 12. Eur Urol Focus. 2022. PMID: 33858810 Review.
-
A Focused Review on the Effects of Preoperative 5α-Reductase Inhibitors Treatment in Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: What Do We Know So Far?J Endourol. 2018 Feb;32(2):79-83. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0734. Epub 2018 Jan 3. J Endourol. 2018. PMID: 29161905 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources