Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov 11;19(11):e0309783.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309783. eCollection 2024.

Australian link worker social prescribing programs: An integrative review

James R Baker  1   2   3 , Michelle Bissett  1   2 , Rosanne Freak-Poli  2   4 , Genevieve A Dingle  2   5 , Yvonne Zurynski  2   6 , Thomas Astell-Burt  2   7   8 , Eric Brymer  1   2 , Tina Prassos  1 , Tamsin Thomas  1 , Cassandra Tognarini  1 , Christina Aggar  1   2
Affiliations
Review

Australian link worker social prescribing programs: An integrative review

James R Baker et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Link worker social prescribing programs are gaining recognition in Australia for addressing health and social needs outside routine medical care. The evaluation of these programs is essential for informing future social prescribing programs, research and evolving policy. However, diverse outcome evaluation measures present challenges for benchmarking across link worker social prescribing programs. An integrative review was conducted to identify and describe outcome domains and measures, and the methodological approaches and evaluation designs of link worker social prescribing programs in Australia. Comprehensive searches of the literature on link worker social prescribing programs in Australia were conducted across 14 electronic databases. In order to reduce the risk of bias, study selection and data extraction were conducted independently by multiple authors, and included studies underwent quality and risk of bias assessment using the standardised Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Outcome domains were categorised into 'person-level', 'system-level' and 'program implementation' domains. Despite the variation in participant groups, the 'person-level' domains of global well-being and social well-being were consistently evaluated. While measurement tools varied significantly, the WHO Quality of Life Brief Assessment and short-form UCLA Loneliness Scale were most commonly applied. At the system level, health service utilisation was primarily evaluated. This integrative review reports on the current state of evidence in Australia, with the potential to track changes and trends over time. Developing a core outcome set, incorporating stakeholder and consumer contributions for benchmarking aligned with the healthcare landscape is recommended. The findings may guide the refining of social prescribing initiatives and future research, ensuring methodological robustness and alignment with individual and community needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study selection PRISMA diagram.
From: Page, McKenzie [52].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Husk K, Elston J, Gradinger F, Callaghan L, Asthana S. Social prescribing: where is the evidence? Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(678):6–7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X700325 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. General practice, allied health and other primary care services. 2023.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework: access to services compared with need. 2023.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Rural and remote health. 2022.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Referred medical specialist attendances. 2022.

LinkOut - more resources