Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 11;11(Suppl 1):63.
doi: 10.1186/s40621-024-00541-1.

Impact of cable lock distribution on firearm securement after emergent mental health evaluation: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Impact of cable lock distribution on firearm securement after emergent mental health evaluation: a randomized controlled trial

Bijan Ketabchi et al. Inj Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Background: Suicide-related presentations to pediatric emergency departments (PED) have increased in recent years. PED providers have the opportunity to reduce suicide risk by counseling on restricting access to lethal means. Supplementing lethal means counseling (LMC) with safety device distribution is effective in improving home safety practices. Data on PED-based LMC in high-risk patient populations is limited. The objective of this study was to determine if caregivers of children presenting to PED for mental health evaluation were more likely to secure all household firearms if given cable-style gun locks in addition to LMC.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, caregivers completed a survey regarding storage practices of firearms and medication in the home. Participants were randomized to receive LMC (control) or LMC plus 2 cable-style gun locks (intervention). Follow-up survey was distributed 1 month after encounter. Primary outcome was proportion of households reporting all household firearms secured at follow-up. Secondary outcomes included: removal of lethal means from the home, purchase of additional safety devices, use of PED-provided locks (intervention only), and acceptability of PED-based LMC.

Results: Two hundred participants were enrolled and randomized. Comparable portions of study groups completed follow-up surveys. Control and intervention arms had similar proportions of households reporting all firearms secured at baseline (89.9% vs. 82.2%, p = 0.209) and follow-up (97.1% vs. 98.5%, p = 0.96), respectively. Other safety behaviors such as removal of firearms (17.6% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.732), removal of medication (19.1% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.361), and purchase of additional safety devices (66.2% vs. 61.8%, p = 0.721) were also alike between the two groups. Both groups held favorable views of PED-based counseling. Within the intervention group, 70% reported use of provided locks. Preference for a different style of securement device was the most cited reason among those not using PED-provided locks.

Conclusions: PED-based LMC is a favorably-viewed, effective tool for improving home safety practices in families of high-risk children. Provision of cable-style gun locks did not improve rate of firearm securement compared LMC alone-likely due to high baseline rates of firearm securement and preference for different style of lock among non-utilizers.

Clinical trial registration: ID: NCT05568901 .

Clinicaltrials: gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ . Retrospectively registered October 6, 2022. First participant enrollment: June 28, 2021.

Keywords: Emergency; Firearm; Lethal means; Mental health; Suicide prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations Consent for publication Neither identifiable information nor protected health data of caregivers or patients are included in the manuscript. Competing interests No conflicts of interest or corporate sponsors to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram of study enrollment. Pre- vs. Post-Counseling firearm securement
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Change in proportion of caregivers reporting all firearms secured with locking device. *Indicates a significant difference from baseline. (Uspal et al. 2021)

Similar articles

References

    1. Albright TL, Burge SK. Improving Firearm Storage habits: impact of brief Office Counseling by Family Physicians. J Am Board Family Med. 2003;16(1):40–6. 10.3122/jabfm.16.1.40. - PubMed
    1. Azrael D, Cohen J, Salhi C, Miller M. Firearm Storage in Gun-owning households with children: results of a 2015 National Survey. J Urb Health. 2018;95(3):295–304. 10.1007/s11524-018-0261-7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barkin SL, Finch SA, Ip EH, et al. Is Office-based counseling about Media Use, Timeouts, and Firearm Storage Effective? Results from a Cluster-Randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2008;122(1):e15–25. 10.1542/peds.2007-2611. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beidas RS, Rivara F, Rowhani-Rahbar A. Safe firearm storage: a call for Research informed by Firearm stakeholders. Pediatrics. 2020;146(5):e20200716. 10.1542/peds.2020-0716. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carbone PS, Clemens CJ, Ball TM, Article. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(11):1049. 10.1001/archpedi.159.11.1049. - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources