Chlorhexidine-alcohol compared with povidone-iodine-alcohol skin antisepsis protocols in major cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 39531051
- PMCID: PMC11588771
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07693-0
Chlorhexidine-alcohol compared with povidone-iodine-alcohol skin antisepsis protocols in major cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Purpose: Whether skin disinfection of the surgical site using chlorhexidine-alcohol is superior to povidone-iodine-alcohol in reducing reoperation and surgical site infection rates after major cardiac surgery remains unclear.
Methods: CLEAN 2 was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-arm, assessor-blind, superiority trial conducted in eight French hospitals. We randomly assigned adult patients undergoing major heart or aortic surgery via sternotomy, with or without saphenous vein or radial artery harvesting, to have all surgical sites disinfected with either 2% chlorhexidine-alcohol or 5% povidone-iodine-alcohol. The primary outcome was any resternotomy by day 90 or any reoperation at the peripheral surgical site by day 30.
Results: Of 3242 patients (1621 in the chlorhexidine-alcohol group [median age, 69 years; 1276 (78.7%) men] and 1621 in the povidone-iodine-alcohol group [median age, 69 years; 1247 (76.9%) men], the percentage required reoperation within 90 days was similar (7.7% [125/1621] in the chlorhexidine-alcohol group vs 7.5% [121/1621] in the povidone-iodine-alcohol group; risk difference, 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI), - 1.58-2.07], P = 0.79). The incidence of surgical site infections at the sternum or peripheral sites was similar (4% [65/1621] in the chlorhexidine-alcohol group vs 3.3% [53/1621] in the povidone-iodine-alcohol group; risk difference, 0.74 [95% CI - 0.55-2.03], P = 0.26). Length of hospital stay, intensive care unit or hospital readmission, mortality and surgical site adverse events were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: Among patients requiring sternotomy for major heart or aortic surgery, skin disinfection at the surgical site using chlorhexidine-alcohol was not superior to povidone-iodine-alcohol for reducing reoperation and surgical site infection rates.
Keywords: Cardiac surgery; Chlorhexidine; Povidone iodine; Skin antisepsis; Surgical site infection.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: MB reports grants from Becton Dickinson; consulting fees from Becton Dickinson and Edwards LifesSciences; honoraria for lectures from Becton Dickinson; and payment for participation on an advisory board for Becton Dickinson and Edwards LifesSciences. BR reports grants from Aguettant and i-SEP; consulting fees from LFB, Aguettant and Nordic Pharma; and attending meetings or travel from i-SEP. JFT reports grants from MSD and Pfizer; honoraria for lectures from Becton Dickinson and Shionogi; and payment for participation on an advisory board for MSD, Pfizer, Gilead, Advanz, Roche and Becton Dickinson. OM reports grants from 3 M and Becton Dickinson; consulting fees from 3 M and Becton Dickinson; honoraria for lectures from 3 M and Becton Dickinson; support for attending meetings or travel from 3 M and Becton Dickinson; and payment for participation on an advisory board for 3 M and Becton Dickinson. All other authors declare no competing interests. Role of the funder: The funders had no role in the design or execution of the trial, data analysis, or writing or reviewing of the manuscript. Data sharing: Data collected for the study, including participant data, the data dictionary defining each field in the set, and the study protocol, will be made available to others. Data will be communicated as de-identified participant data according to French law, and will be available after publication of the manuscript. Data will be made available at the Direction de la Recherche, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France (drci@chu-poitiers.fr), with investigator support, after approval of a proposal with a signed data access agreement.
Figures
References
-
- Allegranzi B, Bischoff P, de Jonge S et al (2016) New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis 16:e276–e287. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30398-X - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization (2016) Global guidelines on the prevention of surgical site infection. World Health Organization, Geneva
-
- Lemaignen A, Birgand G, Ghodhbane W et al (2015) Sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors according to clinical presentation. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:674.e11–18. 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.03.025 - PubMed
-
- Meszaros K, Fuehrer U, Grogg S et al (2016) Risk factors for sternal wound infection after open heart operations vary according to type of operation. Ann Thorac Surg 101:1418–1425. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.010 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
