Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Nov 12;14(11):e087373.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087373.

Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplantation: results from CESIT study, an Italian retrospective cohort study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in liver transplantation: results from CESIT study, an Italian retrospective cohort study

Arianna Bellini et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the use of maintenance immunosuppressive treatments following liver transplantation and to compare their risk-benefit profiles in clinical practice.

Design: Retrospective multicentrer cohort study.

Setting: Four Italian regions (Lombardy, Veneto, Lazio, Sardinia).

Methods: Data were integrated from the national transplant information system and administrative claims data from four Italian regions. All adults who underwent incident liver transplantation between 2009 and 2019 were identified and categorised into two groups: cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The trend of immunosuppressive treatment over years was analysed, and their effectiveness/safety profiles were compared using multivariate Cox models (HR; 95% CI).

Main outcome measures: Mortality, transplant reject/graft failure, incidence of severe infections, cancer, diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events and lipid-modifying agents use.

Results: The study comprised 750 subjects in the cirrhosis cohort and 1159 in the HCC cohort. Over the study years, there was a decline in the use of cyclosporine-CsA, while combination therapy involving tacrolimus with other drugs increased compared with monotherapy. Overall, tacrolimus monotherapy use was slightly over 40% in both groups, followed by tacrolimus+mycophenolate (39.5%-cirrhosis; 30.6%-HCC) and tacrolimus+molecular target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) (8.5%-cirrhosis; 13.3%-HCC). No significant differences emerged in risk-benefit profile of different tacrolimus-based therapies, except for a higher risk of mortality in cirrhosis subjects under tacrolimus monotherapy compared with tacrolimus+mycophenolate (HR: 2.07; 1.17 to 3.65).

Conclusions: The study highlights a shift over time in postliver transplant therapeutic patterns, favouring the use of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate or mTORi, rather than monotherapy. Moreover, a potential association between tacrolimus monotherapy and increased mortality in the cirrhosis cohort was identified. Further research is warranted to investigate these findings more deeply and to optimise treatment strategies for liver transplant recipients.

Keywords: Drug Therapy; Drug Utilization; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; Hepatology; Transplant medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study flowchart and immunosuppressive regimens in liver transplantation for patients with cirrhosis and HCC. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; mTORi, molecular target of rapamycin inhibitors. Note: TAC: Tacrolimus; MMF: Mycophenolate; mTORi: Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors; CsA: Cyclosporine; MONO: Monotherapy
Figure 2
Figure 2. HR for outcomes of interest respect by cirrhosis. Mortality: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, anaemia. Rejection/graft loss: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, BMI, diabetes, cardio-cerebrovascular diseases. Infections: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD. Diabetes: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, thyroid disorders, anaemia, depression, BMI. Cancer: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, anticoagulants/antiplatelet. MACE: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, age (donor), diabetes, BMI, anticoagulants/antiplatelet. Use of LMAs: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, Charlson index, depression, diabetes. Note: TAC: Tacrolimus; BMI: body mass index; IR: incidence rate; LMAs: lipid-modifying agents; MACE: major adverse cardiovascular events; MELD: model for end-stage liver disease; mTORi:molecular target of rapamycin inhibitors.
Figure 3
Figure 3. HR for outcomes of interest respect by HCC. Mortality: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, age (donor), BMI (donor), cardio-cerebrovascular diseases, anaemia. Rejection/graft loss: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, diabetes, thyroid disorders. Infections: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, anaemia/antianemics, BMI (donor), anticoagulants/antiplatelet. Diabetes: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, diuretics. Cancer: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, diuretics, LMAs. MACE: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, Charlson index. Use of LMAs: adjusted for region, sex, age, discharge year, renal disease and dialysis, score MELD, cardio-cerebrovascular diseases. Note: TAC: Tacrolimus; BMI: body mass index; IR: incidence rate; LMAs: lipid-modifying agents; MACE: major adverse cardiovascular events; MELD: model for end-stage liver disease; mTORi:molecular target of rapamycin inhibitors.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Chord diagram showing therapy switch during follow-up by cirrhosis (A) and HCC (B). HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; mTORi, molecular target of rapamycin inhibitors. Note: TAC: Tacrolimus; MMF: Mycophenolate; mTORi: Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors; CsA: Cyclosporine; MONO: Monotherapy

References

    1. Adam R, Karam V, Cailliez V, et al. 2018 Annual Report of the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) - 50-year evolution of liver transplantation. Transpl Int. 2018;31:1293–317. doi: 10.1111/tri.13358. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Di Maira T, Little EC, Berenguer M. Immunosuppression in liver transplant. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2020;46–47:S1521-6918(20)30016-0. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101681. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Åberg F, Gissler M, Karlsen TH, et al. Differences in long-term survival among liver transplant recipients and the general population: a population-based Nordic study. Hepatology. 2015;61:668–77. doi: 10.1002/hep.27538. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watt KDS, Pedersen RA, Kremers WK, et al. Evolution of causes and risk factors for mortality post-liver transplant: results of the NIDDK long-term follow-up study. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:1420–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03126.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2016;64:433–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.10.006. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources