Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Nov 12;15(1):9785.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53727-y.

Neutralizing antibody correlate of protection against severe-critical COVID-19 in the ENSEMBLE single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine efficacy trial

Lindsay N Carpp #  1 Ollivier Hyrien #  1   2 Youyi Fong #  1   2 David Benkeser  3 Sanne Roels  4 Daniel J Stieh  5   6 Ilse Van Dromme  4 Griet A Van Roey  5 Avi Kenny  7   8   9 Ying Huang  1   2   7 Marco Carone  7 Adrian B McDermott  10   11 Christopher R Houchens  12 Karen Martins  12 Lakshmi Jayashankar  12 Flora Castellino  12 Obrimpong Amoa-Awua  10 Manjula Basappa  10 Britta Flach  10 Bob C Lin  10 Christopher Moore  10 Mursal Naisan  10 Muhammed Naqvi  10 Sandeep Narpala  10 Sarah O'Connell  10 Allen Mueller  10 Leo Serebryannyy  10 Mike Castro  10 Jennifer Wang  10 Christos J Petropoulos  13 Alex Luedtke  14 Yiwen Lu  1 Chenchen Yu  1 Michal Juraska  1 Nima S Hejazi  1   15 Daniel N Wolfe  12 Jerald Sadoff  5   16 Glenda E Gray  17   18 Beatriz Grinsztejn  19 Paul A Goepfert  20 Linda-Gail Bekker  21   22   23 Aditya H Gaur  24 Valdilea G Veloso  19 April K Randhawa  1 Michele P Andrasik  1 Jenny Hendriks  5 Carla Truyers  4 An Vandebosch  4   25 Frank Struyf  4   26 Hanneke Schuitemaker  5   27 Macaya Douoguih  5   28 James G Kublin  1 Lawrence Corey  1   29 Kathleen M Neuzil  30   31 Dean Follmann  32 Richard A Koup  10 Ruben O Donis  12 Peter B Gilbert  33   34   35 Immune Assays TeamCoronavirus Vaccine Prevention Network (CoVPN)/ENSEMBLE TeamUnited States Government (USG)/CoVPN Biostatistics Team
Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Neutralizing antibody correlate of protection against severe-critical COVID-19 in the ENSEMBLE single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine efficacy trial

Lindsay N Carpp et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Assessment of immune correlates of severe COVID-19 has been hampered by the low numbers of severe cases in COVID-19 vaccine efficacy (VE) trials. We assess neutralizing and binding antibody levels at 4 weeks post-Ad26.COV2.S vaccination as correlates of risk and of protection against severe-critical COVID-19 through 220 days post-vaccination in the ENSEMBLE trial (NCT04505722), constituting ~4.5 months longer follow-up than our previous correlates analysis and enabling inclusion of 42 severe-critical vaccine-breakthrough cases. Neutralizing antibody titer is a strong inverse correlate of severe-critical COVID-19, with estimated hazard ratio (HR) per 10-fold increase 0.35 (95% CI: 0.13, 0.90). In a multivariable model, HRs are 0.31 (0.11, 0.89) for neutralizing antibody titer and 1.22 (0.49, 3.02) for anti-Spike binding antibody concentration. VE against severe-critical COVID-19 rises with neutralizing antibody titer: 63.1% (95% CI: 40.0%, 77.3%) at unquantifiable [<4.8975 International Units (IU)50/ml], 85.2% (47.2%, 95.3%) at just-quantifiable (5.2 IU50/ml), and 95.1% (81.1%, 96.9%) at 90th percentile (30.2 IU50/ml). At the same titers, VE against moderate COVID-19 is 32.5% (11.8%, 48.4%), 33.9% (19.1%, 59.3%), and 60.7% (40.4%, 76.4%). Protection against moderate vs. severe disease may require higher antibody levels, and very low antibody levels and/or other immune responses may associate with protection against severe disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests J.H. is an employee of Janssen Vaccines & Prevention BV and has stock and/or stock options in Johnson & Johnson. S.R., I.V.D., and C.T. are employees of Janssen Pharmaceuticals and have stock and/or stock options in Johnson & Johnson. F.S. was an employee of J&J at the time the study was conducted and has stock and/or stock options in Johnson & Johnson. F.S. also has shares in GlaxoSmithKline as compensation for past employment. D.J.S., G.A.V.R., J.S., H.S., and M.D. were employees of Janssen Vaccines & Prevention BV and had stock and/or stock options in Johnson & Johnson at the time the work was conducted. J.S. has patents (US 11,384,122 B2) on invention of the Janssen COVID-19 vaccine. A.V. was an employee of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, had stock and/or stock options in Johnson & Johnson at the time the work was conducted, and had all patent rights (US 11,384,122 B2) transferred to Johnson & Johnson. The remaining authors declare no competing interests. Inclusion and Ethics The COV3001 (ENSEMBLE) study was reviewed and approved by all relevant local ethics committees and Institutional Review Boards, listed below: Argentina: ANMAT - Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnologia Médica (Capital Federal, La Plata, Ramos Mejia—Buenos Aires; Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires), Comite de Etica Dr Carlos Barclay (Capital Federal, Buenos Aires; Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires), Comision Conjunta de Investigacion en Salud—CCIS (La Plata, Ramos Mejia–Buenos Aires), Comite de Bioetica de Fundacion Huesped (Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires), Comité de Docencia e Investigación DIM Clínica Privada (Ramos Mejia, Buenos Aires), Comité de Ética en Investigación Clínica y Maternidad Suizo Argentina (Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires), Comité de Ética en Investigación de CEMIC (Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires), Comite de Etica en Investigacion DIM Clinica Privada (Ramos Mejia, Buenos Aires), Comite de Etica Hospital Italiano de La Plata (La Plata, Buenos Aires), Comite de Etiica en Investigacion Hospital General de Agudos J.M. Ramos Mejia (Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires), Comitéde ética del Instituto Médico Platense (CEDIMP) (La Plata, Buenos Aires), IBC Fundacion Huesped (Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires), IBC Helios Salud (Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires), IBC Hospital General de Agudos J.M. Ramos Mejia (Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires) Brazil: ANVISA – Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Salvador, Bahia; Barretos, Campinas, São Paulo, São Jose Rio Preto, Ribeirão Preto, São Caetano do Sul – São Paulo; Santa Maria, Porto Alegre – Rio Grande do Sul; Natal, Rio Grande do Norte; Para, Pará; Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais; Rio de Janeiro, Nova Iguaçu – Rio de Janeiro; Curitiba, Paraná; Brasília, Distrito Federal; Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul; Criciúma, Santa Catarina; Cuiabá, Mato Grosso), CONEP - Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (Salvador, Bahia; São Paulo, São Paulo; Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul; Para, Pará;), CAPPESq – Comissão de Ética de Análise para Projetos de Pesquisa—HCFMUSP (São Paulo, São Paulo), CEP da Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto – FAMERP (São Jose Rio Preto, São Paulo), CEP da Faculdade de Medicina do ABC/SP (São Paulo, São Paulo), CEP da Fundação Pio XII - Hospital do Câncer de Barretos/SP (Barretos, São Paulo), CEP da Liga Norteriograndense Contra o Câncer (Natal, Rio Grande do Norte), CEP da Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Campinas / PUC Campinas (Campinas, São Paulo), CEP da Real Benemérita Associaçao Portuguesa de Beneficência - Hospital São Joaquim (São Paulo, São Paulo), CEP da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Belo Horizonte (Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais), CEP da Secretaria Municipal De Saúde do Rio de Janeiro—SMS/RJ (Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro), CEP da Universidade de São Caetano do Sul (CEP da Universidade de São Caetano do Sul, São Paulo), CEP da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul—UFMS (Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul), CEP da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais), CEP do Centro de Referência e Treinamento DST/AIDS (São Paulo, São Paulo), CEP do do INI-Ipec/Fiocruz (Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro), CEP do Grupo Hospitalar Conceição / RS (Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul), CEP do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto/USP (Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo), CEP do Hospital de Clinicas da Universidade Federal do Parana—HCUFPR / PR (Curitiba, Paraná), CEP do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre/HCPA (Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul), CEP do Hospital Geral de Nova Iguaçu (Nova Iguaçu, Rio do Janeiro), CEP do Hospital Municipal São José (Criciúma, Santa Catarina), CEP do Hospital Pró-Cardíaco/RJ (Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro), CEP do Hospital Sírio Libanês (São Paulo, Sao Paulo), CEP do Hospital Universitário Júlio Muller / MT (Cuiabá, Mato Grosso), CEP do Hospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos—UFBA (Salvador, Bahia), CEP do Instituto de Cardiologia do Distrito Federal (Brasília, Distrito Federal), CEP do Instituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas/SP (São Paulo, Sao Paulo), CEP do Instituto de Saude e Bem Estar da Mulher - ISBEM / SP (São Paulo, Sao Paulo), CEP em Seres Humanos do HFSE - Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado (Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro), CONEP - Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa (Brasília, Distrito Federal, Salvador, Bahia; Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais; Cuiabá, Mato Grosso; Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul; Nova Iguaçu, Rio Janeiro—Rio Janeiro; Barretos, Campinas, Sao Jose Rio Preto, São Caetano do Sul, Sao Paulo, Ribeirão Preto—Sao Paulo; Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul; Natal, Rio Grande do Norte; Curitiba, Paraná; Criciúma, Santa Catarina) Chile: Comité de Ética de Investigación en Seres Humanos (Santiago, Region Met), Comité Ético Científico Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Central (Santiago, Region Met), Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile (Santiago, Region Met; Talca, Temuco), Comité Ético-Científico Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Sur Oriente (Talca, Santiago), Comité de Evaluación Ética Científica Servicio de Salud Araucanía Sur Temuco (Temuco), Comité Ético Científico Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Central (Viña del Mar) Colombia: CEI de la Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia (Floridablanca), Comité de Ética en Investigación Clínica de la Costa (Barranquilla), INVIMA—Instituto Nacional de Vigilancia de Medicamentos y Alimentos (Colombia) (Barranquilla), Comite de Etica en Investigacion de la E.S.E. Hospital Mental de Antioquia (Santa Marta), Comite de Etica en la Investigacion CAIMED (Bogotá), INVIMA—Instituto Nacional de Vigilancia de Medicamentos y Alimentos (Colombia) (Bogotá), Comite Corporativo de Etica en Investigacion de la Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota (Bogotá), Comité de Ética e Investigación Biomédica de la Fundación Valle del Lili (Cali), Comite de Etica e Investigacion IPS Universitaria (Medellin), Comite de Etica en Investigacion Asustencial Cientifica de Alta Complejidad (Bogotá), Comite de Etica en Investigacion Biomedica de la Corporacion Cientifica Pediatrica de Cali (Cali), Comité de Ética en Investigación Clínica de la Costa (Barranquilla), Comite de Etica en Investigacion de la E.S.E. Hospital Mental de Antioquia (Barrio Barzal Villavicencio), Comite de Etica en Investigacion del area de la Salud de la Universidad del Norte (Barranquilla), Comite de Etica en Investigacion Medplus Centro de Recuperación Integral S.A.S (Bogotá), Comité de Ética en Investigaciones CEI-FOSCAL (Floridablanca), Comite de Etica en la Investigacion CAIMED (Bogotá), Comite de Etica para Investigacion Clinica(CEIC) de la Fundacion Centro de Investigacion Clinica CIC (Medellin), Comite de Investigaciones y Etica en Investigaciones Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe (Medellin), INVIMA–Instituto Nacional de Vigilancia de Medicamentos y Alimentos (Colombia) (Barranquilla, Bogotá), Cali, Floridablanca, Medellin Mexico: CEI del Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde (Guadalajara, Jalisco), CEI Hospital La Mision (Tijuana, Baja California Norte), CI del Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde (Guadalajara, Jalisco), CI Hospital La Mision (Tijuana, Baja California Norte), Comite de Bioseguridad del Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica (Mexico, Distrito Federal; Cuernavaca, Morelos), Comite de Etica en Investigacion del Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica (Mexico, Distrito Federal; Cuernavaca, Morelos), Comité de Bioseguridad del Hospital La Misión S.A. de C.V. (Tijuana, Baja California Norte; Oaxaca, Oaxaca; Merida, Yucatán; Tijuana, Baja California Norte), Comité de Bioseguridad de la Coordinación de Investigación en Salud (IMSS) (Mexico, Estado de Mexico), Comité de Bioseguridad de Médica Rio Mayo (CLINBOR) (Mexico, Distrito Federal), Comité de Bioseguridad del Hospital Universitario “Dr. José Eleuterio González” (Monterrey, Nuevo León), COFEPRIS (Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios) (Cuernavaca, Morelos; Mexico, Distrito Federal; Monterrey, Nuevo León; Oaxaca, Oaxaca; Merida, Yucatán), Comite de Etica de la Fac de Med de la UANL y Hospital Universitario “Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez” (Monterrey, Nuevo León), Comite de Etica en Investigacion de la Unidad de Atencion Medica e Investigacion en Salud S.C. (Merida, Yucatán), Comite de Etica en Investigacion de Medica Rio Mayo S.C. (Mexico, Distrito Federal), Comite de Etica en Investigacion de Oaxaca Site Management Organization, S.C. (Oaxaca, Oaxaca), Comite de Etica en Investigacion del Centro Medico Nacional Siglo XXI (IMSS) (Mexico, Estado do Mexico), Comité de Investigación de la Coordinación de Investigación en Salud (IMSS) (Mexico, Estado do Mexico), Comite de Investigacion de la Unidad de Atencion Medica e Investigacion en Salud S.C. (Merida, Yucatán), Comite de Investigacion de Oaxaca Site Management Organization, S.C. (Oaxaca, Oaxaca), Comité de Investigación del Hospital Universitario José Eleuterio González (Monterrey, Nuevo León), Comite de Investigacion Medica Rio Mayo, S.C. (Mexico, Distrito Federal) Peru: Comite Nacional Transitorio de Etica en Invest. de los Ensayos Clinicos de la enfermedad COVID-19 (Iquitos–Maynas, Loreto; Lima, San Miguel – Lima), INS - Instituto Nacional de Salud (Peru) (Lima, San Miguel – Lima; Callao; Iquitos–Maynas, Loreto) South Africa: Department Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) (Port Elizabeth, Mthatha – Eastern Cape; Cape Town, Worcester – Western Cape; Durban, Ladysmith, Vulindlela – KwaZulu-Natal; Johannesburg, Pretoria, Mamelodi East, Soweto, Tembisa – Gauteng; Rustenburg, Klerksdorp – North West; Bloemfontein, Free State; Middelburg, Mpumalanga; Dennilton, Limpopo), Pharma Ethics (Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape; Durban, Ladysmith – KwaZulu-Natal; Cape Town, Western Cape; Pretoria, Mamelodi East, Johannesburg, Tembisa – Gauteng; Rustenburg, Klerksdorp – North West; Bloemfontein, Free State; Middelburg, Mpumalanga; Dennilton, Limpopo), SAHPRA - South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (Port Elizabeth, Mthatha – Eastern Cape; Cape Town, Worcester – Western Cape; Durban, Ladysmith, Vulindlela – KwaZulu-Natal; Johannesburg, Pretoria, Mamelodi East, Soweto, Tembisa – Gauteng; Rustenburg, Klerksdorp – North West; Bloemfontein, Free State; Middelburg, Mpumalanga; Dennilton, Limpopo), WIRB (Mamelodi East, Pretoria – Gauteng; Ladysmith, KwaZulu-Natal; Bloemfontein, Free State; Cape Town, Western Cape; Dennilton, Limpopo), Wits Health Consortium (Soweto, Johannesburg – Gauteng; Ladysmith, KwaZulu-Natal; Mthatha, Eastern Cape), Wits Institutional Biosafety Committee (Soweto, Pretoria, Johannesburg, Tembisa – Gauteng; Rustenburg, Klerksdorp – North West; Mthatha, Eastern Cape), University of Cape Town HREC (Cape Town, Worcester – Western Cape); University of Cape Town Institute of Infectious Disease & Molecular Medicine (Cape Town, Worcester – Western Cape), University of Cape Town Institutional Biosafety Committee (Cape Town, Worcester – Western Cape), SAMRC Human Research Ethics Committee Scientific Review (Durban, KwaZulu-Natal), Sefako Makgatho University Research Ethics Committee (SMUREC) (Pretoria, Gauteng), University of KwaZulu Natal Institutional Biosafety Committee (Durban, KwaZulu-Natal), University of KwaZulu-Natal Ethics (Durban, Vulindlela – KwaZulu-Natal), University of Stellenbosch Ethics Committee (Cape Town, Western Cape), University of KwaZulu Natal Institutional Biosafety Committee (Vulindlela, KwaZulu-Natal) United States: Advarra IBC (Detroit, MI; Chapel Hill, NC; Boston, MA; Seattle, WA; Winston-Salem, NC; Austin, TX; Peoria, IL; Huntsville, AL; Long Beach, CA; Tucson, AZ), Biomedical Institute of New Mexico - IBC (Albuquerque, NM), Birmingham VA Medical Center - Alabama- IBC (Birmingham, AL), Clinical Biosafety Services (Hollywood, FL), Columbia University IBC (New York, NY), Copernicus Group IRB (Austin, Dallas, Houston, San Antonio – TX; Rochester, New York, Bronx, Binghamton – NY; Hillsborough, Hackensack, Newark, New Brunswick – NJ; West Palm Beach, Coral Gables, Hollywood, Miami, Orlando, Gainesville, Tampa, Hallandale Beach, Pinellas Park, The Villages, Jacksonville, Deland – FL; Fort Worth, Dallas, San Antonio – TX; Norfolk, Charlottesville – VA; Matairie, New Orleans – LA; Nashville, Knoxville, Memphis, Bristol – TN; Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Akron – OH; Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids – MI; Philadelphia, Pittsburgh – PA; Stanford, San Diego, San Francisco, Oakland, Long Beach, Anaheim, Sacramento, West Hollywood – CA, Las Vegas, Reno – NV; Chicago, Peoria – IL; Omaha, NE; Mobile, Birmingham, Huntsville – AL; St Louis, Greer, Kansas City – MO; Boston, MA; Harrisburg, SD; Decatur, Atlanta, Savannah – GA; Baltimore, Rockville, Annapolis – MD; New Haven, Hartford – CT; Chapel Hill, Raleigh, Fayetteville, Charlotte, Durham, Winston-Salem – NC; Indianapolis, Valparaiso, Evansville – IN; Seattle, WA; Aurora, CO; Lexington, Louisville – KY; Murray, West Jordan, Salt Lake City – UT; Phoenix, Tucson, Glendale – AZ; Spartanburg, Columbia, North Charleston, Anderson, Charleston, Mount Pleasant – SC; Portland, Medford, Corvallis – OR; Albuquerque, Gallup – NM; Little Rock, AR; Jackson, MS; Newport News, VA, Minneapolis, MN; Lenexa, KS), WIRB (Hackensack, NJ; Dallas, TX; Baltimore, MD; Chicago, IL; Aurora, CO; Winston-Salem, NC; Minneapolis, MN; Orlando, Miami, Gainesville – FL; Philadelphia, Pittsburgh – PA; Boston, MA; St Louis, MO; Bronx, New York, NY; New Brunswick, NJ; Phoenix, AZ; Birmingham, AL; Louisville, KY; Albuquerque, NM; New Orleans, LA; Baltimore, MD; San Francisco, CA; Tampa, FL; Aurora, CO; Columbia, SC; Decatur, GA; Reno, NV; Raleigh, NC; Little Rock, AS), Clinical Biosafety Services (Dallas, San Antonio – TX; San Diego, CA; Lexington, KY; Murray, UT; Greer, Kansas City, St Louis – MO; Rockville, MD; Las Vegas, NV; Cincinnati, Columbus, Akron – OH; Phoenix, Tucson, Glendale – AZ; North Charleston, Anderson – SC; Orlando, Pinellas Park, The Villages, Miami – FL; Birmingham, AL; Valparaiso, Evansville – IN; Lenexa, KS), Columbia University IBC (Bronx, New York), Durham VA Medical Center-IBC (Raleigh, NC), Emory University IRB (Decatur, GA), Environmental Health and Safety Office (Atlanta, GA), Institutional Biosafety Committee (New Orleans, LA), James A. Haley Veterans Hospital_IBC (Tampa, FL), Jesse Brown VA Medical Center- IBC (Chicago, IL), Mass General Brigham IBC (Boston, MA), Mount Sinai- Icahn School of Medicine IBC (New York, NY), New York Blood Center IBC (New York, NY), OHSU IBC (Portland, OR), Partners Institutional Biosafety Committee (Boston, MA), Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center-IBC (Aurora, CO), Rush University Medical Center (Chicago, IL), Rush University Medical Center IBC (Chicago, IL), Rutgers Institutional Biosafety Committee (New Brunswick, NJ), Saint Louis University IBC (St Louis, MO), Saint Michael’s Medical Center IRB (Newark, NJ), Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System IBC (New Orleans, LA), St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital IBC Committee (Memphis, TN), St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital IRB (Memphis, TN), Stanford University Administrative Panel on Human Subjects in Medical Research (Stanford, CA), Temple University–IBC (Philadelphia, PA), The University of Chicago Institutional Biosafety Committee (Chicago, IL), UAMS IBC (Little Rock, AS), UIC IBC (Chicago, IL), University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Biosafety Committee (Birmingham, AL), University of Arkansas IRB (Little Rock, AS), University of Kentucky Biological Safety (Lexington, KY), University of Kentucky IRB (Lexington, KY), University of Louisville IRB (Louisville, KY), University of Miami-IBC (Miami, FL), University of Mississippi Medical Center IRB (Jackson, MI), University of Pennsylvania Institutional Biosafety Committee (Philadelphia, PA), University of Pittsburgh IBC (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), University of South Florida IRB (Tampa, FL), University of Utah Institutional Biosafety Committee (Salt Lake City, UT), University of Utah IRB (Salt Lake City, UT), UTHealth – IBC (Houston, TX), VA Baltimore Research & Education Foundation (BREF)- IBC (Baltimore, MD), VA Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System-IBC (Little Rock, AS), VA James J. Peters Department of VA Medical Center-IBC (Bronx, NY), VA Medical Center - Atlanta-IBC (Decatur, GA), VA Medical Center San Francisco- IBC (San Francisco, CA), VA North Florida/South Georgia IBC (Gainesville, FL), VA North Texas Health Care System IBC (Dallas, TX), VA San Diego Healthcare System IBC (Phoenix, AZ), VA Sierra Nevada Health Care System-IBC (Reno, NV), Vanderbilt University Instituitional Review Board (Nashville, TN), Washington University IBC (St Louis, MO), WCG IBCS (Houston, TX; Orlando, FL), Western Institutional Review Board (San Diego, CA; Detroit, MI; New Orleans, LA; New York, NY), WIRB - IBCS Services (Chicago, IL; New Orleans, LA; Oakland, CA; Minneapolis, MN; Columbus, OH; Lexington, KY), WJB Dorne VA Medical Center IBC (Columbia, SC).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. SARS-CoV-2 variants causing the severe-critical COVID-19 endpoints.
Variants are shown by calendar date of severe-critical COVID-19 occurrence and are broken out by geographic region (a, Latin America; b, USA; c, South Africa) and treatment assignment. Endpoint counts do not require having D1 and D29 antibody marker data (see the flowchart provided as Supplementary Fig. 2). As in Sadoff et al., “Reference” refers to the index strain (GenBank accession number: MN908947.3) harboring the D614G point mutation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. D29 antibody marker level by COVID-19 outcome status (moderate COVID-19 case, severe-critical COVID-19 case, or non-case).
a 50% inhibitory dilution neutralizing antibody (nAb-ID50) titer, (b) anti-Spike IgG concentration, and (c) anti-RBD IgG concentration. Data points are from baseline SARS-CoV-2 seronegative per-protocol vaccine recipients. Violin plots contain interior box plots with upper and lower horizontal edges the 25th and 75th percentiles of antibody level and middle line the 50th percentile, and vertical bars the distance from the 25th (or 75th) percentile of antibody level and the minimum (or maximum) antibody level within the 25th (or 75th) percentile of antibody level minus (or plus) 1.5 times the interquartile range. Each side shows a rotated probability density (estimated by a kernel density estimator with a default Gaussian kernel) of the data. Positive response frequencies (Freq.) computed with inverse probability of sampling weighting. Positive response definitions: Spike IgG, IgG>10.8424 BAU/ml; RBD IgG, IgG>14.0858 BAU/ml. ULoQ: Spike IgG, 238.1165 BAU/ml; RBD IgG, 172.5755 BAU/ml. Positive response for nAb-ID50: D1 nAb-ID50 titer <LLOQ (LLOQ = 4.8975 IU50/ml) with detectable D29 nAb-ID50 ( ≥ LLOQ), or D1 nAb-ID50 > LLOQ with at least a fourfold increase in D29 nAb-ID50. ULoQ: ID50, 844.7208 IU50/ml. Moderate cases are baseline SARS-CoV-2 seronegative per-protocol vaccine recipients with the moderate COVID-19 endpoint (moderate COVID-19 with onset both ≥ 7 days post D29 and ≥28 days post-vaccination) up to 181 days post-D29 but not past data cut (July 9, 2021). Severe-critical cases are baseline SARS-CoV-2 seronegative per-protocol vaccine recipients with the severe-critical COVID-19 endpoint (severe-critical COVID-19 with onset both ≥ 7 days post-D29 and ≥28 days post-vaccination) up to 170 days post-D29 but not past data cut (July 9, 2021). Non-cases are baseline seronegative per-protocol vaccine recipients sampled into the immunogenicity subcohort with no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection up to the end of the correlates study period, which is up to 181 days post-D29 but not past data cut (July 9, 2021). BAU binding antibody units, IU international units, LLoQ lower limit of quantitation, Pos.Cut positivity cut-off, ULoQ upper limit of quantitation. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Severe-critical COVID-19 risk and moderate COVID-19 risk by D29 antibody marker tertile.
Plots show covariate-adjusted cumulative incidence of (a, c severe-critical COVID-19 or b, d) moderate COVID-19 by Low, Medium, and High tertiles of D29 (a, b) 50% inhibitory dilution neutralizing antibody titer (nAb-ID50) or (b, d) anti-Spike IgG concentration in baseline SARS-CoV-2–seronegative per-protocol vaccine recipients. e Covariate-adjusted hazard ratios of severe-critical COVID-19 or of moderate COVID-19 across D29 antibody marker tertiles. Endpoint counts for (ad) calculated by inverse probability of sampling D29 marker weighting. The overall p value is from a two-sided generalized Wald test of whether the hazard rate of the designated COVID-19 endpoint differed across the Low, Medium, and High subgroups. Analyses adjusted for baseline behavioral risk score and geographic region. BAU binding antibody units, CI confidence interval, FDR false discovery rate, FWER family-wise error rate, IU international units, Pt. Est. point estimate. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Vaccine efficacy against severe-critical COVID-19 or against moderate COVID-19 by D29 antibody marker level.
Vaccine efficacy estimates against (a, c) severe-critical COVID-19 and against (b, d) moderate COVID-19 through 170 (severe-critical) or 181 (moderate) days post-D29 were obtained using a nonparametric implementation of the method of Gilbert et al.. Each point on the curve represents the estimated controlled vaccine efficacy at the given D29 antibody marker level: (a, b) 50% inhibitory dilution neutralizing antibody (nAb-ID50) titer and (c, d) anti-Spike IgG binding antibody concentration. Dotted lines indicate bootstrap pointwise 95% CIs. The green histograms are frequency distributions of D29 marker level, with maroon dots representing marker levels of individual cases. Analyses adjusted for baseline behavioral risk score and geographic region. Curves are plotted over the nAb-ID50 titer range from unquantifiable to the 90th percentile (30.2 IU50/ml) and over the Spike IgG concentration range from negative response to the 90th percentile (125 BAU/ml). The horizontal gray line is the overall vaccine efficacy against (a, c) severe-critical COVID-19 or against (b, d) moderate COVID-19 through 170 (severe-critical) or 181 (moderate) days post-D29, with the dotted gray lines indicating the 95% CIs. BAU binding antibody units, CVE controlled vaccine efficacy, IU international units, LLOQ lower limit of quantitation, nAb-ID50 50% inhibitory dilution neutralizing antibody. nAb-ID50 LLOQ = 4.8975 IU50/ml; Spike IgG positivity cutoff = 10.8424 BAU/ml. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Exposure-proximal vaccine efficacy against severe-critical COVID-19 or against moderate COVID-19 by current antibody marker level.
Analyses were performed in baseline SARS-CoV-2 seronegative per-protocol vaccine recipients. Exposure-proximal vaccine efficacy estimates against (a, c) severe-critical COVID-19 and against (b, d) moderate COVID-19 through 170 (severe-critical) or 181 (moderate) days post-D29 by current antibody marker level were obtained using the method of Huang and Follmann, with “current” referring to the true underlying antibody marker level not subject to technical measurement error, in a hypothetical scenario in which the value was available from serum samples collected every day over the follow-up period (see “Methods”). Each point on the curve represents the vaccine efficacy at the given current antibody marker level: (a, b) 50% inhibitory dilution neutralizing antibody (nAb-ID50) titer and (c, d) anti-Spike IgG binding antibody concentration. The dashed lines are bootstrap pointwise 95% CIs. Analyses adjusted for baseline behavioral risk score and geographic region. Curves are plotted over the range from negative binding antibody response (or unquantifiable neutralizing antibody titer) to the 97.5th percentile of each current antibody marker level: Spike IgG, negative response to 352 BAU/ml; RBD IgG, negative response to 486 BAU/ml; nAb-ID50, unquantifiable to 43.4 IU50/ml. Positivity cutoffs: 10.8424 BAU/ml for Spike and 14.0858 BAU/ml for RBD; nAb-ID50 LLOQ = 4.8975 IU50/ml. BAU binding antibody units, CI confidence interval, IU international units, LLOQ lower limit of quantitation, nAb-ID50 50% inhibitory dilution neutralizing antibody. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Plotkin, S. A. & Gilbert, P. B. “Correlates of Protection” in Plotkin’s Vaccines (Seventh Edition). S. A. Plotkin, W. A. Orenstein, P. A. Offit, K. M. Edwards, Eds. (Elsevier, 2018), 3.
    1. Plotkin, S. A. & Gilbert, P. B. Nomenclature for immune correlates of protection after vaccination. Clin. Infect. Dis.54, 1615–1617 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilbert, P. B. et al. A Covid-19 milestone attained — A correlate of protection for vaccines. N. Engl. J. Med.387, 2203–2206 (2022). - PubMed
    1. Sadoff, J. et al. Safety and efficacy of single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med384, 2187–2201 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sadoff, J. et al. Final analysis of efficacy and safety of single-dose Ad26.COV2.S. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 847–860 (2022). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data