Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 12;15(1):9797.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54136-x.

HSF-1 promotes longevity through ubiquilin-1-dependent mitochondrial network remodelling

Affiliations

HSF-1 promotes longevity through ubiquilin-1-dependent mitochondrial network remodelling

Annmary Paul Erinjeri et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Increased activity of the heat shock factor, HSF-1, suppresses proteotoxicity and enhances longevity. However, the precise mechanisms by which HSF-1 promotes lifespan are unclear. Using an RNAi screen, we identify ubiquilin-1 (ubql-1) as an essential mediator of lifespan extension in worms overexpressing hsf-1. We find that hsf-1 overexpression leads to transcriptional downregulation of all components of the CDC-48-UFD-1-NPL-4 complex, which is central to both endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria associated protein degradation, and that this is complemented by UBQL-1-dependent turnover of NPL-4.1. As a consequence, mitochondrial network dynamics are altered, leading to increased lifespan. Together, our data establish that HSF-1 mediates lifespan extension through mitochondrial network adaptations that occur in response to down-tuning of components associated with organellar protein degradation pathways.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Ubql-1 is necessary for hsf-1 OE to extend lifespan.
a Changes in median lifespan in wildtype and hsf-1 overexpressing (hsf-1 OE) worms after RNAi against HSF-1 target genes (sample numbers for all groups can be found within Supplementary Data 1). b, c STRING networks of screened genes that, when knocked down, were found to (b) decrease hsf-1 OE lifespan by > 20% with no effect on wild-type lifespan, or (c) increase hsf-1 OE lifespan by > 20% but decrease wildtype lifespan by the same degree. Black lines represent interaction by co-expression, and purple lines represent evidence of experimental interaction. ubql-1 was included in (c) for reference, and genes without any connections were removed. d Relative expression of ubql-1 mRNA on day 1 of adulthood in wildtype, ubql-1(tm1574), hsf-1 OE, and hsf-1 OE; ubql-1(tm1574) animals grown on OP50. Values were normalised to the geometric mean of the housekeeping genes rpb-2, pmp-3, and cdc-42. Data plotted are the mean of 4 biological replicates +/− SD (wildtype vs ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.0008; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p = 0.0005; ubql-1(tm1574) vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.8662). e, f Lifespan of (e) wildtype and hsf-1 OE animals on empty vector and ubql-1(RNAi) (wildtype vs ubql-1(RNAi), p = 0.2886; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(RNAi), p = 0.0002) and (f) wildtype, ubql-1(tm1574), hsf-1 OE, hsf-1 OE;ubql-1(tm1574) animals grown on OP50 (wildtype vs ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.0002; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p < 0.0001). Statistical significance was calculated using (d) two-way ANOVA with Fishers LSD and (e, f) Mantel-Cox log-rank test. ns, not significant (p > 0.05), **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Full statistics for lifespan trials (including n values) can be found in Supplementary Data 2. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Ubql-1 is not required for hsf-1 OE to suppress age-related protein aggregation.
ac Relative expression of hsp-16.11, hsp-70 and F44E5.4 mRNA on day 1 of adulthood in wildtype, ubql-1(tm1574), hsf-1 OE, and hsf-1 OE;ubql-1(tm1574) animals grown on OP50 and subjected to heat shock (33 °C, 30 mins). Values were normalised to the geometric mean of the housekeeping genes rpb-2, pmp-3 and cdc-42, and data are the mean of 4 biological replicates. Statistical comparisons are: (a) hsp-16.11 (wildtype vs ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.4326; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.3181; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p = 0.0115; ubql-1(tm1574) vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.3286), (b) hsp-70 (wildtype vs ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.6431, hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.3581, wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p = 0.0007; ubql-1(tm1574) vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.0138), (c) F44E5.4 (wildtype vs ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.8607; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.7737; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p = 0.0463; ubql-1(tm1574) vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.1324). d Survival of wildtype, ubql-1(tm1574), hsf-1 OE, hsf-1 OE;ubql-1(tm1574) animals on D1 of adulthood following exposure to heat shock (35˚C for 4 h) (wildtype vs ubql-1(tm1574), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p = 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.9380). e Representative images of wildtype and hsf-1 OE worms expressing intestinal polyQ44::YFP grown on the empty vector (EV) or ubql-1(RNAi) at day 5 of adulthood. Scale bar, 200 µm. f, g Number of polyglutamine::YFP aggregates present in the (f) intestine (Q44::YFP) and (g) body wall muscle (Q35::YFP) on D5 of adulthood in wildtype and hsf-1 OE animals grown on empty vector and ubql-1(RNAi). One of three independent experiments has been represented for intestinal and muscle PolyQ sensors. Intestinal and muscle data are presented as the mean values +/− SD. Statistical comparisons are (f) iPolyQ EV (n = 35) vs iPolyQ;ubql-1(RNAi) (n = 32), p = 0.0009; hsf-1OE;iPolyQ EV (n = 33) vs hsf-1OE;iPolyQ;ubql-1(RNAi) (n = 36), p = 0.9424; iPolyQ EV vs hsf-1OE;iPolyQ EV, p < 0.0001; iPolyQ; ubql-1(RNAi) vs hsf-1OE; iPolyQ;ubql-1(RNAi), p < 0.0001, and (g) mPolyQ EV (n = 25) vs mPolyQ;ubql-1(RNAi) (n = 23), p = 0.0008; hsf-1OE;mPolyQ EV (n = 21) vs hsf-1OE;mPolyQ;ubql-1(RNAi) (n = 23), p < 0.0001; mPolyQ EV vs hsf-1OE;mPolyQ EV, p < 0.0001; mPolyQ;ubql-1(RNAi) vs hsf-1OE;mPolyQ;ubql-1(RNAi), p < 0.0001. h, i western blotting for K48-linked ubiquitylated proteins on (h) day 1 or (i) day 5 of adulthood in wildtype, ubql-1(tm1574), hsf-1 OE, and hsf-1 OE;ubql-1(tm1574) animals. Blots are representative of 4 independent experiments. All error bars denote SD. Statistical significance was calculated using (ac, f and g) two-way ANOVA with Fishers LSD and (d) Mantel-Cox log-rank test. ns, not significant (p > 0.05), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Full statistics for lifespan trials (including n values) can be found in Supplementary Data 2. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Ubql-1 is necessary for elevated NPL-4.1 levels in hsf-1 OE animals.
a, b Volcano plots representing differentially regulated (a) genes (green dots = up-regulated, red dots = down-regulated, FDR p < 0.05) and (b) proteins (red dots in the right and left region of the volcano plot represent proteins significantly up-or down-regulated, respectively (two-tailed student’s t test, FDR < 0.05) in hsf-1 OE vs hsf-1 OE; ubql-1(tm1574) worms on day 1 of adulthood. Values are the mean of 4 biological replicates. c, d Heatmaps of ubql-1 dependent changes in (c) gene expression and (d) protein abundance in hsf-1 OE worms. e Heatmap showing the relative expression of CDC-48-NPL-4-UFD-1 complex associated genes within RNA-seq datasets from wildtype vs hsf-1 OE worms, and hsf-1 OE vs hsf-1 OE; ubql-1(tm1574) worms. f Heatmap showing the relative abundance of CDC-48-NPL-4-UFD-1 complex associated proteins within proteomics datasets from hsf-1 OE vs hsf-1 OE; ubql-1(tm1574) worms. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Animals overexpressing HSF-1 exhibit altered mitochondrial morphology and are sensitive to knockdown of the CDC-48-UFD-1-NPL-4 complex.
a Survival of wildtype and hsf-1 OE worms exposed to Tunicamycin (50 µg/ml) or DMSO (0.2%) on NGM plates from day 1 of adulthood onwards (wildtype DMSO vs wildtype tunicamycin, p < 0.0001; hsf-1 OE DMSO vs hsf-1OE tunicamycin, p < 0.0001; wildtype tunicamycin vs hsf-1OE tunicamycin, p < 0.0001). b Representative fluorescence images of myo-3p::GFPmit in wildtype or hsf-1 OE muscle tissues on day 2 of adulthood. Scale bar, 20 µm. c Proportion of mitochondria exhibiting specific morphologies in wildtype or hsf-1 OE muscle tissues on day 2 of adulthood (myo-3::GFP(mit), n = 20; hsf-1OE; myo-3::GFP(mit), n = 28). d Relative prevalence of fused mitochondria in wildtype or hsf-1 OE muscle tissues on day 2 of adulthood. Data are presented as the mean values +/− SD of 3 independent experiments (p = 0.0046). This experiment was also run +/− ubql-1 RNAi, which is plotted in Fig. S5b. e Lifespan analysis of wildtype and hsf-1 OE animals subjected to sel-11 RNAi (wildtype vs sel-11(RNAi), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;sel-11(RNAi), p < 0.0001). fh Lifespan analyses of wildtype, ubql-1 (tm1574) mutants, hsf-1 OE and hsf-1 OE;ubql-1(tm1574) animals subjected to empty vector pL4440 and RNAi-mediated (f) npl-4.1/4.2, (g) ufd-1 and (h) cdc-48.1 knockdown (wildtype vs npl-4.1/4.2(RNAi), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.0008; ubql-1(tm1574) vs ubql-1(tm1574);npl-4.1/4.2(RNAi), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;npl-4.1/4.2(RNAi), p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574) vs hsf-1OE; ubql-1(tm1574); npl-4.1/4.2(RNAi), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs ufd-1(RNAi), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.0008; ubql-1(tm1574) vs ubql-1(tm1574); ufd-1(RNAi), p < 0.0001, wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE; ufd-1(RNAi), p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE;ubql-1 (tm1574) vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574);ufd-1(RNAi), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs cdc-48.1(RNAi), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.0008; ubql-1(tm1574) vs ubql-1(tm1574);cdc-48.1 (RNAi), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;cdc-48.1 (RNAi), p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574) vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574); cdc-48.1 (RNAi), p < 0.0001). Statistical significance was calculated using (d) two-way ANOVA with Fishers LSD or (a, and eh) Mantel-Cox log-rank test. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Full statistics for lifespan trials (including n values) can be found in Supplementary Data 2. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. hsf-1 overexpression reduces respiration and promotes mitochondrial fusion in a ubql-1 dependent manner.
a Proportion of mitochondrial morphologies observed in pmyo-3::GFP(mit) worms and hsf-1 OE; pmyo-3::GFP(mit) worms grown on empty vector control or ubql-1(RNAi) on day 3 of adulthood (myo-3::GFP(mit), n = 38; myo-3::GFP(mit);ubql-1(RNAi), n = 32; hsf-1OE; myo-3::GFP(mit), n = 33; hsf-1OE; myo-3::GFP(mit); ubql-1(RNAi), n = 27. b Prevalence of fused mitochondria in muscle tissues of wildtype and hsf-1 OE worms, +/− ubql-1 (RNAi), on day 3 of adulthood. Values are the mean +/- SD of three independent experiments (myo-3::GFP(mit) vs myo-3::GFP(mit);ubql-1(RNAi), p = 0.6018; hsf-1OE; myo-3::GFP(mit) vs hsf-1OE; myo-3::GFP(mit);ubql-1(RNAi), p = 0.0120; myo-3::GFP(mit) vs hsf-1OE;myo-3::GFP(mit), p = 0.0003; myo-3::GFP(mit);ubql-1(RNAi) vs hsf-1OE; myo-3::GFP(mit);ubql-1(RNAi), p = 0.0113). c Representative confocal microscope images of myo-3p::GFPmit within muscle tissues of wildtype or hsf-1 OE worms +/− ubql-1(RNAi) on day 3 of adulthood. Scale bar, 20 µm. d Basal Oxygen consumption rates (OCR) in wildtype, ubql-1(tm1574), hsf-1 OE and hsf-1 OE; ubql-1(tm1574) animals at day 1 of adulthood. Mean values +/− SD (n = 10 replicates per group where each replicate has 10 worms) are plotted. One of three independent experiments has been represented for OCR (wildtype vs ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.9947; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p < 0.0001; ubql-1 (tm1574) vs hsf-1OE;ubql-1(tm1574), p = 0.5736). e Prevalence of fused mitochondria in muscle tissues of wildtype and hsf-1 OE worms, +/− npl-4.1 (RNAi), on day 3 of adulthood. The plotted values are from four independent experiments. The number of worms imaged per experiment was: Experiment 1, n = 10 for all groups; Experiment 2, n = 10 for all groups except wildtype npl-4.1(RNAi) (n = 5); Experiment 3 and 4, n = 15 for all groups. Statistical comparisons are: myo-3::GFP(mit) vs myo-3::GFP(mit);npl-4.1/4.2(RNAi), p = 0.0230; hsf-1OE; myo-3::GFP(mit) vs hsf-1OE; myo-3::GFP(mit); npl-4.1/4.2(RNAi), p = 0.7201; myo-3::GFP(mit) vs hsf-1OE;myo-3::GFP(mit), p = 0.0032; myo-3::GFP(mit);npl-4.1/4.2(RNAi) vs hsf-1OE; myo-3::GFP(mit); npl-4.1/4.2(RNAi), p = 0.1766. (f and g) Basal OCR in (f) wildtype or (g) hsf-1 OE animals, +/− npl-4.1/4.2 (RNAi), at day 1 of adulthood. Mean values are plotted +/− SD (n = 6 replicates per group where each replicate has 10 worms (wildtype vs wildtype;npl-4.1/4.2(RNAi), p = 0.2869; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;npl-4.1/4.2(RNAi), p = 0.8256. One of two independent experiments has been shown. hk Lifespan of wildtype and hsf-1 OE animals on empty vector and (h) fzo-1(RNAi) (fusion) (wildtype vs wildtype;fzo-1(RNAi), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;fzo-1(RNAi), p = 0.3953), (i) eat-3 (RNAi) (fusion) (wildtype vs wildtype;eat-3(RNAi), p < 0.0001; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;eat-3(RNAi), p = 0.0134) (j) drp-1(RNAi) (fission) (wildtype vs wildtype;drp-1(RNAi), p = 0.0086; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p < 0.0001; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;drp-1(RNAi), p < 0.0001) and (k) pink-1 (RNAi) (mitophagy) (wildtype vs wildtype;pink-1(RNAi), p = 0.0166; wildtype vs hsf-1OE, p = 0.0020; hsf-1OE vs hsf-1OE;pink-1(RNAi), p = 0.1268). All error bars denote SD. Statistical significance was calculated by (b, d, and e) two-way ANOVA with Fishers LSD test, (f, g) two-tailed, unpaired Students t test, or (hk) Mantel-Cox Log-rank test. ns, not significant (p > 0.05), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 ****p < 0.0001. Full statistics for lifespan trials (including n values) can be found in Supplementary Data 2. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Lopez-Otin, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. Hallmarks of aging: An expanding universe. Cell186, 243–278 (2023). - PubMed
    1. Douglas, P. M. & Dillin, A. Protein homeostasis and aging in neurodegeneration. J. Cell Biol.190, 719–729 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Labbadia, J. & Morimoto, R. I. The biology of proteostasis in aging and disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem.84, 435–464 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akerfelt, M., Morimoto, R. I. & Sistonen, L. Heat shock factors: integrators of cell stress, development and lifespan. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.11, 545–555 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gomez-Pastor, R., Burchfiel, E. T. & Thiele, D. J. Regulation of heat shock transcription factors and their roles in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.19, 4–19 (2018). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data