Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;44(3):521-534.
doi: 10.1002/jum.16616. Epub 2024 Nov 12.

Reliability of Semitendinosus and Biceps Femoris Aponeurosis Thickness Using B-Mode Ultrasound

Affiliations

Reliability of Semitendinosus and Biceps Femoris Aponeurosis Thickness Using B-Mode Ultrasound

Chrysostomos Sahinis et al. J Ultrasound Med. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to assess the reliability of aponeurosis and muscle thickness of the hamstrings using ultrasound (US).

Methods: US images were captured from the semitendinosus (ST) and biceps femoris long head (BFlh) of 30 individuals (15 females), undergoing two testing sessions with a 24-hour interval. Measurements were taken at six sites along the thigh at two knee angles (0° = full extension and 90°) in prone position. Aponeurosis and muscle thickness across the entire length of ST and BFlh were evaluated using computational image segmentation which generated ~360 data points per participant.

Results: The intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.937 to 0.998 while the standard error of measurement varied from 0.88 to 2.72% for superficial aponeurosis, from 1.41 to 2.29% for deep aponeurosis, and from 1.50 to 4.22% for muscle thickness. The minimal detectable change ranged from 2.44 to 7.56% for the superficial aponeurosis, from 3.57 to 6.27% for deep aponeurosis, and from 4.17 to 11.70% for BF and ST muscle thickness.

Conclusions: Evaluation of hamstring aponeurosis and muscle thickness measurements at rest displayed very high reliability and, hence, such measurements can be used to diagnose changes in thickness due to injury or exercise interventions.

Keywords: aponeurosis; biceps femoris; hamstrings; muscle thickness; reliability; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative examples of a series of static images obtained at the different measurement sites along the thigh length for the Biceps Femoris and Semitendinosus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of ultrasound (US) image of Semitendinosus muscle indicating region of interest as well as the placement of the landmarks to measure muscle and aponeurosis thickness. The fit provided set of landmarks, comprising x‐ and y‐coordinates of 60 evenly spaced pixel points spanning the entire width of the region of interest. The white vertical lines represent thickness measures recorded in Semitendinosus muscle and aponeurosis thickness.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Test (light blue) and retest (dark blue) group mean and SD values for the superficial aponeurosis thickness of the BFlh (A and C) and Semitendinosus (B and D), normalized to muscle length at full extension (A and B) and 90° knee flexion (C and D). The 0% of muscle is proximate to the knee joint, whereas the 100% is closer to the hip joint. The thick lines represent the mean values, while the thin lines, filled with color, indicate the SD.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Test (light blue) and retest (dark blue) group mean and SD values for the deep aponeurosis thickness of the BFlh (A and C) and Semitendinosus (B and D), normalized to muscle length at full extension (A and B) and 90° knee flexion (C and D). The 0% of muscle is proximate to the knee joint, whereas the 100% is closer to the hip joint. The thick lines represent the mean values, while the thin lines, filled with color, indicate the SD.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Test (light blue) and retest (dark blue) group mean and SD values for the muscle thickness of the BFlh (A and C) and Semitendinosus (B and D), normalized to muscle length at full extension (A and B) and 90° knee flexion (C and D). The 0% of muscle is proximate to the knee joint, whereas the 100% is closer to the hip joint. The thick lines represent the mean values, while the thin lines, filled with color, indicate the SD.

References

    1. Ekstrand J, Waldén M, Hägglund M. Hamstring injuries have increased by 4% annually in men's professional football, since 2001: a 13‐year longitudinal analysis of the UEFA Elite Club injury study. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50:731–737. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095359. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thelen DG, Chumanov ES, Sherry MA, Heiderscheit BC. Neuromusculoskeletal models provide insights into the mechanisms and rehabilitation of hamstring strains. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2006; 34:135–141. - PubMed
    1. Kellis E, Sahinis C. Is muscle architecture different in athletes with a previous hamstring strain? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2022; 7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilke J, Hespanhol L, Behrens M. Is it all about the fascia? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the prevalence of extramuscular connective tissue lesions in muscle strain injury. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7:1133‐1141. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kerin F, O'Flanagan S, Coyle J, et al. Intramuscular tendon injuries of the hamstring muscles: a more severe variant? A narrative review. Sport Med – Open 2023; 9. 10.1186/s40798-023-00621-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources