Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan;24(1):19-39.
doi: 10.1038/s41573-024-01060-w. Epub 2024 Nov 12.

DNA damage response inhibitors in cancer therapy: lessons from the past, current status and future implications

Affiliations
Review

DNA damage response inhibitors in cancer therapy: lessons from the past, current status and future implications

Yvette Drew et al. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

The DNA damage response (DDR) is a network of proteins that coordinate DNA repair and cell-cycle checkpoints to prevent damage being transmitted to daughter cells. DDR defects lead to genomic instability, which enables tumour development, but they also create vulnerabilities that can be used for cancer therapy. Historically, this vulnerability has been taken advantage of using DNA-damaging cytotoxic drugs and radiotherapy, which are more toxic to tumour cells than to normal tissues. However, the discovery of the unique sensitivity of tumours defective in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway to PARP inhibition led to the approval of six PARP inhibitors worldwide and to a focus on making use of DDR defects through the development of other DDR-targeting drugs. Here, we analyse the lessons learnt from PARP inhibitor development and how these may be applied to new targets to maximize success. We explore why, despite so much research, no other DDR inhibitor class has been approved, and only a handful have advanced to later-stage clinical trials. We discuss why more reliable predictive biomarkers are needed, explore study design from past and current trials, and suggest alternative models for monotherapy and combination studies. Targeting multiple DDR pathways simultaneously and potential combinations with anti-angiogenic agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors are also discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Y.D. has participated in advisory boards for Clovis Oncology, AstraZeneca, Merck, Tesaro Inc (now GlaxoSmithKline), GlaxoSmithKline and Genmab. Y.D. has received research grant funding from Clovis Oncology and was involved in the preclinical and clinical development of rucaparib. Y.D. has received royalties for her involvement in the development of rucaparib. Y.D. has received research grant funding from AstraZeneca, Tesaro Inc and Roche. F.T.Z. was an employee at EMD Serono, Billerica, MA an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and/or its affiliates have certain rights in patents, patent applications pertaining to DNA Damage Response inhibitors, and F. Z. is named inventor on several patents. N.J.C. was involved in the development of rucaparib, receiving grant funding from Agouron Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer Oncology. She has received grant funding from BioMarin for translational studies with talazoparib. She was involved in the development of DNA-PK inhibitors and ATM inhibitors, receiving grant funding from Kudos (subsequently acquired by AstraZeneca). She was involved in the preclinical evaluation of ATR inhibitors, receiving grant funding from Vertex and Merck. She is inventor on several patents concerning PARP, DNA-PK, ATM and ATR inhibitors. She has received grant funding from Breakpoint Pharmaceuticals and has consulted for Abbvie and Tesaro on PARP inhibitors and Sierra Oncology on CHK1 inhibitors, she currently consults for Duke Street Bio. She diverts her royalty payments to charity.

References

    1. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011). This key review updates Hanahan and Wieinberg’s original landmark paper of 2000 with additional focus on genetic instability as an enabling characteristic and drugs targeting the hallmarks of cancer. - PubMed
    1. Bartkova, J. et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 434, 864–870 (2005). - PubMed
    1. Bieging, K. T., Mello, S. S. & Attardi, L. D. Unravelling mechanisms of p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 14, 359–370 (2014). - PubMed - PMC
    1. Boulton, S. J. Cellular functions of the BRCA tumour-suppressor proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34, 633–645 (2006). - PubMed
    1. Sarni, D. & Kerem, B. Oncogene-induced replication stress drives genome instability and tumorigenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1339 (2017). - PMC

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources