Resisting technological inevitability: Google Wing's delivery drones and the fight for our skies
- PMID: 39533913
- PMCID: PMC11558236
- DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2024.0107
Resisting technological inevitability: Google Wing's delivery drones and the fight for our skies
Abstract
Efforts to realize on-demand delivery drone networks present a stark example of how the technology industry seeks to dominate new markets, regardless of societal consequences. Analyzing the most advanced of these efforts-Google Wing's operations in Australia since 2017-we identify the instrumental role of narratives of technological inevitability (of tech expansion, and societal adaptation) in catalyzing new sky-based commerce. Yet the interest of this case study lies in a twist. Google Wing's rollout in Australia's capital, Canberra, initially proceeded as a textbook example of tech expansion. However, citizen engagement and public governance dramatically intervened and, we argue, disrupted the logic of technological inevitability. This article is the first to analyze these dynamics, many of which originated with Bonython Against Drones (BAD), a community action group forged from those who first lived under Google's food delivery drones. The article exposes the flawed logic of technological inevitability as the enabling force of tech expansion; characterizes the governance failures that help install corporate visions for public goods; animates the potentialities of communities living with new technologies; and identifies the sky itself, as both a public commons and a vital, living habitat, as a key future locus for participatory governance. This article is part of the theme issue 'Co-creating the future: participatory cities and digital governance'.
Keywords: Google; drones; inevitability; smart cities; tech determinism; tech resistance.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
-
- Kitchin R. 2014. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79 , 1–14. (10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8) - DOI
-
- Sadowski J. 2021. Who owns the future city? Phases of technological urbanism and shifts in sovereignty. Urban Stud. 58 , 1732–1744. (10.1177/0042098020913427) - DOI
-
- Zuboff S. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books.
-
- Morozov E. 2017. Google’s plan to revolutionise cities is a takeover in all but name. The Guardian, 21 October. See https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/21/google-urban-cities-p....
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials