Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 26;9(11):3250-3264.
doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.08.020. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Daratumumab-Based Desensitization Before Kidney Transplantation

Affiliations

Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Daratumumab-Based Desensitization Before Kidney Transplantation

Caroline Pilon et al. Kidney Int Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: The safety and benefit of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab, which induces lysis of antibody-producing plasma cells in sensitized patients prior to kidney transplantation, remain to be determined.

Methods: A 2-phase (1 and 2), monocentric open-label study was conducted to evaluate the month 6 (M6) safety and efficacy of daratumumab in kidney transplant candidates with calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) > 95%. In the first (safety) phase, we used 4-weekly escalating doses of daratumumab. Phase 2 tested desensitization with 8 weekly infusions of 16 mg/kg daratumumab. cPRA 10,000 was calculated considering only human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of > 10,000.

Results: Nine patients were enrolled in phase 1 and 14 in phase 2. Safety analysis showed 4 serious non-treatment-emergent adverse events (non-TEAEs), 36 mild TEAEs, mostly infusion-related reactions, grade 1 and 2 (causing 2 temporary drug discontinuations), but no serious TEAEs. Significant reductions in anti-HLA antibodies were observed at month 3 (M3), with cPRA 10,000 (P = 0.003), number of anti-HLA (P < 0.001), maximum MFI (MFI max) (P = 0.053), and the sum of MFI (MFI sum) (P < 0.001), with complete return to baseline levels at month 12 (M12). At M6, 46.15% (19.22%-74.87%) and 76.92% (46.19%-94.96%) of patients showed sustained response (1% decrease in cPRA) for cPRA 2000 and 10,000, respectively. At month 1 (M1), immune cells (T-reg, CD8 + TEMRA, CD19 + CD138 + B cells, and NK cells) significantly decreased. At M3, other antibodies decreased significantly, but returned to baseline levels at M12, except for gamma globulins, without any infectious complications.

Conclusion: The first use of daratumumab in desensitization demonstrated infusion-related adverse (AEs) events and rapid, albeit transient, reductions in anti-HLA antibodies, with less than 40% of durable responders, limiting its potential clinical use.

Keywords: lymphocytes; pharmacokinetics; translational; transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Design and (b) flowchart of the study. The study consisted of 2 steps: phase 1 evaluated the safety of daratumumab given at doses that were doubled once every 4 weeks over 3 dose-intervals, from 4 mg/kg to 8 mg/kg and then to 16 mg/kg, in 9 patients (dose escalation phase). Phase 2 evaluated the desensitization effect of 16 mg/kg of daratumumab given for 8 weeks (desensitization step). Follow-up lasted 12 months after the first infusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evolution of anti-HLA characteristics between baseline and month 12 after the first infusion; each curve represents a patient. (a) cPRA 2000 remained stable (P = 0.197); (b) cPRA 10,000 returned to baseline (P = 0.399); (c) total number of anti-HLA antibodies returned to baseline (P = 0.301); (d) global MFI max returned to baseline (P = 0.592); (e) global MFI sum returned to baseline (P = 0.207). cPRA, calculated panel reactive antibody; MFI max, maximum mean fluorescence intensity; MFI sum, sum of mean fluorescence intensity.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phenotypic analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), kinetics of the indicated population over the 12-month follow-up and box plot comparison for the M0/M1 period. (a) Plasmablast CD138+ cell levels among PBMC. (b) CD8 CD45RA+ CCR7− TEMRA (terminally differentiated effector memory) and CD45RA+ CCR7+ naive cell levels among CD8. (c) Percentage of T-reg cells (CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+) among CD4 cells. (d) Total NK cells (CD56+) among PBMC. Box plots show the percentage of positive cells with 5% to 95% whiskers. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare results. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01. M0, month 0; M1, month 1; NK, natural killer; Treg, T-regulator cells.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sypek M.P., Kausman J.Y., Watson N., et al. The introduction of cPRA and its impact on access to deceased donor kidney transplantation for highly sensitized patients in Australia. Transplantation. 2021;105:1317–1325. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003410. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Audry B., Savoye E., Pastural M., et al. The new French kidney allocation system for donations after brain death: rationale, implementation, and evaluation. Am J Transplant. 2022;22:2855–2868. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17180. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stegall M.D., Stock P.G., Andreoni K., Friedewald J.J., Leichtman A.B. Why do we have the kidney allocation system we have today? a history of the 2014 kidney allocation system. Hum Immunol. 2017;78:4–8. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.08.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sapir-Pichhadze R., Tinckam K.J., Laupacis A., Logan A.G., Beyene J., Kim S.J. Immune sensitization and mortality in wait-listed kidney transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:570–578. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014090894. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stewart D.E., Kucheryavaya A.Y., Klassen D.K., Turgeon N.A., Formica R.N., Aeder M.I. Changes in deceased donor kidney transplantation one year after KAS implementation. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:1834–1847. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13770. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources