Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 31;9(11):3290-3300.
doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.08.027. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Impact of Different Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Resumption Timing on Post Acute Kidney Injury Outcomes

Affiliations

Impact of Different Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Resumption Timing on Post Acute Kidney Injury Outcomes

Jia-Jin Chen et al. Kidney Int Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence suggests a survival benefit from resuming angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) post acute kidney injury (AKI) compared to nonuse; however, the optimal timing and its impact on outcomes are unclear. The risks of earlier resumption, such as recurrent AKI or hyperkalemia, remain unexplored.

Methods: Using multiinstitutional electronic health records, we analyzed the relationship between 3 ACEI or ARB (ACEI/ARB) resumption timelines post-AKI (prior to discharge, 0-3 months, and 4-6 months postdischarge) and outcomes including all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), dialysis initiation or end-stage renal disease (ESRD), severe hyperkalemia, and recurrent AKI with hospitalization. Cox proportional models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes across different resumption timings, following a target trial design.

Results: Among 5392 AKI survivors resuming ACEI/ARB within 6 months post-AKI, earlier resumption was associated with lower mortality, MACCE, MACCE-related mortality, new dialysis initiation or ESRD (P < 0.001 in trend tests), without increased risks of severe hyperkalemia and re-AKI admissions. Early resumption has a lower mortality compared to 4 to 6 months postdischarge (before discharge, HR: 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.93; 0-3 months, HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.85-0.94). Subgroup analysis showed a lower mortality HR from earlier resumption among AKI survivors with prior ACEI/ARB comorbidity indications (P < 0.001 in trend tests; before discharge, HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.80-0.90; 0-3 months, HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93).

Conclusion: Our cohort demonstrates lower risks for mortality, cardiovascular events, and ESRD with early ACEI/ARB resumption, without heightened risks of severe hyperkalemia or rehospitalization for AKI. Early resumption should be considered for patients with indications for ACEI/ARB.

Keywords: ACEI; ARB; RAAs inhibitor; acute kidney disease; acute kidney injury; resumption.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for the inclusion and exclusion of study patients. ACEI, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; AKI, acute kidney injury; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative event rates by timing of ACEI/ARB resumption: (a) MACCE, (b) new dialysis/ESRD, (c) cardiovascular death, (d) all-cause mortality, (e) severe hyperkalemia, (f) recurrent AKI admission. ACEI, angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitor; AKI, acute kidney injury; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
Figure 3
Figure 3
eGFR decline and slope after ACEI/ARB resumption in the IPTW-adjusted cohort. ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting. The slope of eGFR decline during 3-year follow-up after discharge day from the index AKI admission in each study group were estimated using the linear mixed model which treated participants as random effect.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. James M.T., Bhatt M., Pannu N., Tonelli M. Long-term outcomes of acute kidney injury and strategies for improved care. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16:193–205. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0247-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee C.C., Kuo G., Chan M.J., et al. Characteristics of and outcomes after dialysis-treated acute kidney injury, 2009-2018: a Taiwanese multicenter study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2023;81:665–674.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.08.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen J.J., Chang C.H., Wu V.C., et al. Long-term outcomes of acute kidney injury after different types of cardiac surgeries: a population-based study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019718. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Werner C., Baumhakel M., Teo K.K., et al. RAS blockade with ARB and ACE inhibitors: current perspective on rationale and patient selection. Clin Res Cardiol. 2008;97:418–431. doi: 10.1007/s00392-008-0668-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palevsky P.M., Liu K.D., Brophy P.D., et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;61:649–672. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.02.349. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources