Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Oct 29:81:13359.
doi: 10.3389/bjbs.2024.13359. eCollection 2024.

Comparing the Effect of DOAC-Stop® and DOAC-Remove® on Apixaban, Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran Prior to Thrombophilia and Lupus Testing

Noor-E-Huddah Malik  1 , Andrew Ward  1 , Beth Erskine  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing the Effect of DOAC-Stop® and DOAC-Remove® on Apixaban, Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran Prior to Thrombophilia and Lupus Testing

Noor-E-Huddah Malik et al. Br J Biomed Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) interfere with coagulation assays potentially leading to inaccurate results. This study determined the effectiveness of DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove® in overcoming DOAC interference. It aimed to investigate the extent to which apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran had an effect on thrombophilia and lupus tests using normal plasma, as well as whether DOACs interfere with true-positive results by testing abnormal controls.

Methods: Apixaban (0.03 mg/mL), rivaroxaban (0.01 mg/mL), and dabigatran (0.019 mg/mL) stock solutions were made and added to the normal pool at three different concentrations (200, 400 and 600 ng/mL) and to the abnormal controls at a single concentration. These samples and untreated DOAC controls were tested before and after adding either DOAC-stop® or DOAC-remove®. The measured parameters included protein C, protein S, antithrombin III (ATIII), DRVVS, DRVVC, PTT-LA and DOAC concentration. The normal pool spiked with DOAC was repeated seven times for each DOAC at each concentration level and the abnormal controls spiked with DOAC were repeated four times at a single concentration level for each DOAC.

Results: In the normal pool, dabigatran and rivaroxaban affected all lupus anticoagulant tests, whereas apixaban only affected DRVVS and DRVVC. While dabigatran led to false-positive protein S deficiency and falsely elevated ATIII. Both DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove® brought the thrombophilia results and all falsely elevated lupus anticoagulant results back within the normal range for apixaban and rivaroxaban. For dabigatran all the affected lupus anticoagulant tests remained abnormal following DOAC-remove®, unlike DOAC-stop® treatment, where only DRVVS and DRVVC at 600 ng/mL remained abnormal. In abnormal controls, all DOACs falsely elevated the lupus anticoagulant tests, whereas dabigatran caused false negative ATIII results, that were corrected (remained abnormal) with DOAC-stop® and DOAC-remove®. DOAC-stop® showed a greater reduction in lupus anticoagulant results than DOAC-remove®, causing a false-negative DRVVT ratio for rivaroxaban.

Conclusion: DOAC-stop® is more effective than DOAC-remove® in removing all DOACs below the reference range, whereas DOAC-remove® failed to remove dabigatran.

Keywords: DOAC-interference; DOAC-remove®; DOAC-stop®; lupus anticoagulant testing; thrombophilia testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Van der Hulle T, Kooiman J, Den Exter P, Dekkers O, Klok F, Huisman M. Effectiveness and Safety of Novel Oral Anticoagulants as Compared With Vitamin K Antagonists in the Treatment of Acute Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. J Thromb Haemost (2014) 12(3):320–8. 10.1111/jth.12485 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen A, Stecker E, Warden BA. Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use: A Practical Guide to Common Clinical Challenges. J Am Heart Assoc Cardiovasc Cerebrovasc Dis (2020) 9(13):e017559. 10.1161/JAHA.120.017559 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fang MC, Reynolds K, Fan D, Prasad PA, Sung SH, Portugal C, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Extended Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism. JAMA Netw Open (2023) 6(8):e2328033. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28033 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rose DK, Bar B. Direct Oral Anticoagulant Agents: Pharmacologic Profile, Indications, Coagulation Monitoring, and Reversal Agents. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis (2018) 27(8):2049–58. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.04.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heestermans M, Poenou G, Hamzeh-Cognasse H, Cognasse F, Bertoletti L. Anticoagulants: A Short History, Their Mechanism of Action, Pharmacology, and Indications. Cells (2022) 11(20):3214. 10.3390/cells11203214 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources