Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun:5:100397.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100397. Epub 2024 Feb 16.

Experience of decision-making for home breech birth: An interpretive description

Affiliations

Experience of decision-making for home breech birth: An interpretive description

Robyn Schafer et al. SSM Qual Res Health. 2024 Jun.

Abstract

Despite research and recommendations supporting shared decision-making and vaginal birth as a reasonable option for appropriately screened candidates with a term breech pregnancy, cesarean remains the only mode of birth available in most hospitals in the United States. Unable to find care for planned vaginal birth in a hospital setting, some individuals choose to pursue breech birth at home, potentially placing themselves and their infants at increased risk. Through this analysis of qualitative data gathered from a mixed methods study, we explored the experience of decision-making of 25 individuals who left the US hospital system to pursue a home breech birth. Data were gathered through open-ended survey responses (n = 25) and subsequent in-depth, semi-structured interviews (n = 23) and analyzed using an interpretive description approach informed by situational analysis. Five interwoven and dynamic themes were identified in this complex decision-making process: valuing and trusting in normal birth, being "backed into a corner," asserting agency, making an informed choice, and drawing strength from the experience. This study provides a foundation for understanding the experience of decision-making and can inform future research and clinical practice to improve the provision of safe and respectful, person-centered care for breech pregnancy and birth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Experience of decision-making following diagnosis of term breech presentation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. ACOG Committee on Ethics. (2016). Committee opinion no. 664: Refusal of medically recommended treatment during pregnancy. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 127(6), e175–e182. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001485 - DOI - PubMed
    1. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. (2001). Committee opinion no. 265: Mode of term single breech delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 98(6), 1189–1190. - PubMed
    1. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. (2017). Committee opinion no. 697: Planned home birth. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 129(4), 779–780. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. (2018). Committee opinion no. 745: Mode of term singleton breech delivery: Interim update. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 132(2), e60–e63. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002755 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basile Ibrahim B, Knobf MT, Shorten A, Vedam S, Cheyney M, Illuzzi J, & Kennedy HP (2021). “I had to fight for my VBAC”: A mixed methods exploration of women’s experiences of pregnancy and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States. Birth, 48(2), 164–177. 10.1111/birt.12513 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources