Targeted antimicrobial regimens for Gram-negative prosthetic joint infections: a prospective multicenter study
- PMID: 39535202
- PMCID: PMC11619448
- DOI: 10.1128/aac.01232-24
Targeted antimicrobial regimens for Gram-negative prosthetic joint infections: a prospective multicenter study
Abstract
Fluoroquinolones (FQs) are considered the most effective antimicrobial treatment for Gram-negative prosthetic joint infection (GN-PJI). Alternatives are needed due to increasing FQ resistance and side effects. We aimed to compare different targeted antimicrobial strategies for GN-PJI managed by debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or one-stage revision surgery (1SR) and to review the literature of oral treatment options for GN-PJI. In this prospective, multicenter, registry-based study, all consecutive patients with a PJI caused by a Gram-negative microorganism (including mixed infections with Gram-positive microorganisms), managed with DAIR or 1SR from 2015 to 2020, were included. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Patients underwent targeted therapy with oral FQ, oral cotrimoxazole, or intravenous or oral β-lactams. Survival analysis was performed with use of Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models to identify factors potentially associated with treatment failure. Seventy-four patients who received either FQ (n = 47, 64%), cotrimoxazole (n = 13, 18%), or β-lactams (n = 14, 18%) were included. Surgical strategy consisted of DAIR (n = 72) or 1SR (n = 2). Median follow-up was 449 days (interquartile range 89-738 days). Failure free survival did not differ between the FQ (72%) and cotrimoxazole (92%) groups (log rank, P = 0.13). This outcome did not change when excluding all pseudomonal PJI in the FQ group. Cotrimoxazole is a potential effective targeted antimicrobial therapy for patients with GN-PJI. A randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm the findings of this study.
Keywords: Gram-negative PJI; antimicrobial treatment; prosthetic joint infections; total hip; total knee.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Benito N, Mur I, Ribera A, Soriano A, Rodríguez-Pardo D, Sorlí L, Cobo J, Fernández-Sampedro M, Del Toro MD, Guío L, et al. . 2019. The different microbial etiology of prosthetic joint infections according to route of acquisition and time after prosthesis implantation, including the role of multidrug-resistant organisms. J Clin Med 8:673. doi:10.3390/jcm8050673 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ariza J, Cobo J, Baraia-Etxaburu J, Benito N, Bori G, Cabo J, Corona P, Esteban J, Horcajada JP, Lora-Tamayo J, Murillo O, Palomino J, Parra J, Pigrau C, Del Pozo JL, Riera M, Rodríguez D, Sánchez-Somolinos M, Soriano A, Del Toro MD, de la Torre B, Spanish Network for the Study of Infectious Diseases and the Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC) . 2017. Executive summary of management of prosthetic joint infections. Clinical practice guidelines by the Spanish society of infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (SEIMC). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 35:189–195. doi:10.1016/j.eimc.2016.08.012 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR, Infectious Diseases Society of America . 2013. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 56:e1–e25. doi:10.1093/cid/cis803 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zijlstra WP, Ploegmakers JJW, Kampinga GA, Toren-Wielema ML, Ettema HB, Knobben BAS, Jutte PC, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Northern Infection Network for Joint Arthroplasty (NINJA) . 2022. A protocol for periprosthetic joint infections from the Northern Infection Network for Joint Arthroplasty (NINJA) in the Netherlands. Arthroplasty 4:19. doi:10.1186/s42836-022-00116-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical