Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Jun;39(6):1126-1133.
doi: 10.1111/jdv.20388. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

Efficacy and safety of tozorakimab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A Phase 2a randomized controlled trial (FRONTIER-2)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of tozorakimab in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A Phase 2a randomized controlled trial (FRONTIER-2)

J I Silverberg et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by intense pruritus and eczematous lesions. Tozorakimab is a high-affinity human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes interleukin-33, a broad-acting alarmin cytokine that is over-expressed in keratinocytes of patients with AD.

Objectives: This Phase 2a study (FRONTIER-2; NCT04212169) evaluated the safety and efficacy of tozorakimab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Methods: FRONTIER-2 was a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind study conducted from 9 December 2019 to 20 September 2022 at 32 centres across six countries. Patients were randomized 3:1:1:3 to receive placebo, tozorakimab 60 mg, tozorakimab 300 mg or tozorakimab 600 mg by subcutaneous injection once every 4 weeks for four doses. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline to Week 16 in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score in patients treated with tozorakimab versus placebo. Secondary outcomes included EASI-75 responders (patients achieving ≥75% reduction from baseline in EASI score), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) responders (patients achieving an IGA score of 0 or 1), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and safety.

Results: Overall, 148 patients were randomized. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint (60 mg difference of 1.3 [90% confidence interval (CI): -13.7, 16.2], p = 0.888; 300 mg: difference of 5.9 [90% CI: -10.4, 22.1], p = 0.549; 600 mg: difference of - 1.7 [90% CI: -13.4, 10.0], p = 0.807). The proportion of EASI-75 and IGA 0/1 responders at Week 16 was numerically higher in the tozorakimab 600 mg group than in the placebo group (EASI-75: 18.2% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.094; IGA 0/1: 9.1% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.113). Serum pharmacokinetics were dose-dependent, immunogenicity incidence was low and tozorakimab was well tolerated.

Conclusions: FRONTIER-2 did not show a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint for tozorakimab compared with placebo. However, numerical increases in responder rates were observed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.I.S. has received grant funding from Galderma, Incyte and Pfizer, for which his institution has been renumerated; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AbbVie, Alamar, Aldena, Amgen, AOBiome, Apollo, Arcutis, Arena, Asana, Aslan, Attovia, BiomX, Biosion, Bodewell, Boehringer‐Ingelheim, Bristol‐Meyers Squibb, Cara, Castle Biosciences, Celgene, Connect Biopharma, CorEvitas, Dermavant, Eli Lilly, FIDE, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Inmagene, Invea, Kiniksa, Leo Pharma, Merck, MyOr Diagnostics, Nektar, Novartis, Optum, Pfizer, RAPT, Recludix, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi‐Genzyme, Shaperon, TARGET‐RWE, Teva, Union and UpToDate; and has declared other financial or non‐financial interests from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi‐Genzyme. M.N.M., H.C.P., F.R., A.L., R.S., R.M., A.K., E.J., M.G.B, M.W.S. and C.K. are employees of AstraZeneca and may hold stock or stock options. R.C. and M.G. are former employees of AstraZeneca and may hold stock or stock options.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study design flowchart. The study comprised a screening and TCS/TCI washout period of up to 4 weeks, a 16‐week treatment period and an 8‐week follow‐up period. Q4W, every 4 weeks; SC, subcutaneously; TCI, topical calcineurin inhibitor; TCS, topical corticosteroid.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Adjusted mean percentage change from baseline in EASI up to Week 16. Data are from a mixed model with repeated measures analysis, excluding data after study withdrawal or use of rescue therapy (ITT population). EASI, Eczema Area and Severity Index; ITT, intention‐to‐treat; SE, standard error.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lobefaro F, Gualdi G, Di Nuzzo S, Amerio P. Atopic dermatitis: clinical aspects and unmet needs. Biomedicine. 2022;10:2927. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raimondo A, Lembo S. Atopic dermatitis: epidemiology and clinical phenotypes. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11:e2021146. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiesa Fuxench ZC, Block JK, Boguniewicz M, Boyle J, Fonacier L, Gelfand JM, et al. Atopic dermatitis in America study: a cross‐sectional study examining the prevalence and disease burden of atopic dermatitis in the US adult population. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139:583–590. - PubMed
    1. Davis DMR, Drucker AM, Alikhan A, Bercovitch L, Cohen DE, Darr JM, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis in adults with phototherapy and systemic therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90:e43–e56. - PubMed
    1. Simpson EL, Bieber T, Guttman‐Yassky E, Beck LA, Blauvelt A, Cork MJ, et al. Two phase 3 trials of dupilumab versus placebo in atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2335–2348. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources