Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 1;43(Pt 1):126526.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126526. Epub 2024 Nov 12.

Intranasal immunization with CPAF combined with ADU-S100 induces an effector CD4 T cell response and reduces bacterial burden following intravaginal infection with Chlamydia muridarum

Affiliations

Intranasal immunization with CPAF combined with ADU-S100 induces an effector CD4 T cell response and reduces bacterial burden following intravaginal infection with Chlamydia muridarum

Taylor B Poston et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection globally, and a vaccine is urgently needed to stop transmission and disease. Chlamydial Protease Activity Factor (CPAF) is an immunoprevalent and immunodominant antigen for CD4 T cells and B cells, which makes it a strong vaccine candidate. Due to the tolerogenic nature of the female genital tract (FGT) and its lack of secondary lymphoid tissue, effective induction of protective cell-mediated immunity will likely require potent and safe mucosal adjuvants. To address this need, we produced CPAF in a cell-free protein synthesis platform and adjuvanted it with the TLR9-agonist CpG1826, a synthetic cyclic-di-AMP (CDA) STING (stimulator of interferon genes) agonist ADU-S100, and/or the squalene oil-in-water nanoemulsion, AddaS03. We determined that intranasal immunization with CPAF plus ADU-S100 was well tolerated in female mice, induced CD4 T cells characterized by TNFα production alone or in combination with IL-17 A or IFNγ, significantly reduced bacterial shedding, and shortened the duration of infection in mice intravaginally challenged with Chlamydia muridarum. These data demonstrate the potential for CDA as a mucosal adjuvant for vaccines against Chlamydia genital tract infection.

Keywords: ADU-S100; AddaS03; Chlamydia; CpG1826; Mucosal; STING; T cell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Daisy Arroyo reports financial support was provided by Vaxcyte, Inc. Tony Bruno reports financial support was provided by Vaxcyte, Inc. Manhong Wu reports financial support was provided by Vaxcyte, Inc. James Rozzelle reports financial support was provided by Vaxcyte, Inc. Jeff Fairman reports financial support was provided by Vaxcyte, Inc. Taylor B. Poston has patent Chlamydial Protease-Like Activity Factor and Adjuvant Compositions And Uses Thereof pending to Assignee. Toni Darville has patent Chlamydial Protease-Like Activity Factor and Adjuvant Compositions And Uses Thereof pending to Assignee. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Recombinant Cm CPAF S491A expression in a cell-free protein synthesis platform.
(A) SDS-PAGE showing full-length inactive CPAF and N-terminal and C-terminal protein fragments. (B) SDS-PAGE showing unclipped full-length K232Q inactive CPAF. (C) Analytical size-exclusion chromatography for both CPAF variants.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Intranasal administration of adjuvanted CPAF does not induce inflammation or gross pathology in the lung.
Levels of IFNγ, IL-6, and TNFα in the lung 3 hours (A), 24 hours (B), and 1 week (C) post immunization. H&E staining of lungs from immunized mice (n=5/group) after 3 h hours (D), 24 hours (E), and 1 week (F) post-immunization. Group 1: CPAF only, Group 2: CPAF + CpG + CDA, Group 3: CPAF + CpG + CDA + AS03, Group 4: CpG + CDA + AS03, Group 5: CPAF-2Bxy-dopa (TLR7/8 agonist).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Cellular and humoral responses after intranasal CPAF immunization.
(A) Schematic for immunogenicity and challenge experiments. (B) Antibody titers in mice immunized with CPAF plus CDA alone, triple adjuvant combination, or antigen alone. p=NS for all comparisons by one-way ANOVA (n=5/group). (C) IFNγ ELISpot responses in immunized mice for all adjuvant iterations (n=4–5/group). ****p<0.0001 by one-way ANOVA (D) Representative plots for CPAF-specific cytokine responses in CPAF + CDA immunized mice by ICS (n=5). (E) Frequency of CPAF-specific mono- and poly-functional memory (CD44hi CD62L−) CD4 and CD8 T cell responses in CPAF + CDA immunized mice (n=5/group). **p<0.01 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All data are representative of two independent experiments.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. CPAF plus CDA intranasal immunization reduces burden in intravaginally challenged mice and does not enhance oviduct pathology.
(A) Course of C. muridarum challenge infection in immunized mice and controls (n=9–10 mice/group). rCPAF + CDA vs. PBS (−1.51 log, ****p<0.0001), rCPAF + CDA vs. rCPAF (−0.85 log, ****p<0.0001), rCPAF + CDA vs. rCPAF + CpG (−1.10 log, ****p<0.0001), rCPAF + CDA vs. rCPAF + AS03 (−0.84 log, ****p<0.0001), rCPAF + CDA vs. rCPAF + CpG + AS03 (−0.69 log, ****p<0.0001), p=NS for rCPAF + CDA vs. all vaccine combinations incorporating CDA. Significance determined by two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. (B) Frequency of oviduct hydrosalpinx after challenge of mice immunized with CPAF plus CDA alone, triple adjuvant combination, CPAF alone, or PBS. Dotted line set to oviduct hydrosalpinx frequency in PBS controls. (C) Oviduct dilatation scores of immunized mice and controls. Significance determined by Kruskal-Wallis test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01

Update of

References

    1. Newman L, Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Wijesooriya NS, Unemo M, Low N, Stevens G, Gottlieb S, Kiarie J, Temmerman M: Global Estimates of the Prevalence and Incidence of Four Curable Sexually Transmitted Infections in 2012 Based on Systematic Review and Global Reporting. PLoS One 2015, 10:e0143304. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stamm WE: Chlamydia trachomatis infections: progress and problems. JInfectDis 1999, 179 Suppl 2:S380–S3. - PubMed
    1. Farley TA, Cohen DA, Elkins W: Asymptomatic sexually transmitted diseases: the case for screening. Prev Med 2003, 36:502–9. - PubMed
    1. Shannon CL, Klausner JD: The growing epidemic of sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: a neglected population. Curr Opin Pediatr 2018, 30:137–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Russell AN, Zheng X, O’Connell CM, Taylor BD, Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Zhong W, Darville T: Analysis of Factors Driving Incident and Ascending Infection and the Role of Serum Antibody in Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Tract Infection. J Infect Dis 2016, 213:523–31. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources