Horizontal QRS axis predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block
- PMID: 39536809
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.011
Horizontal QRS axis predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block
Abstract
Background: Electrocardiogram criteria for left bundle branch block (LBBB) inadequately predict left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony, complicating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidate selection.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the horizontal QRS axis for CRT response in heart failure (HF) patients with LBBB patterns.
Methods: The direction and magnitude of the horizontal QRS axis were calculated using the net amplitudes in leads V2 and V6. CRT response was defined as a ≥10% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and at least 1 New York Heart Association class reduction 1 year after CRT implantation. The composite end point included HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality.
Results: Of 244 consecutive CRT recipients, 156 (63.9%) responded favorably; 88 (36.1%) were nonresponders. The horizontal QRS axis demonstrated significant backward deviation (-75.5° [-79.7° to -69.0°] vs -65.0° [-73.0° to -46.5°]; P < .001) and larger magnitude (35.5 ± 10.9 mm vs 25.5 ± 10.5 mm; P < .001) in CRT responders compared with nonresponders. The direction and magnitude independently predicted CRT response with an area under the curve of 0.778 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.717-0.839) and 0.749 (95% CI, 0.685-0.814), respectively. Combining both parameters increased the area under the curve to 0.814 (95% CI, 0.760-0.868). Moreover, the direction and magnitude of the horizontal QRS axis, or their combination, predicted the composite end point of HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality, with hazard ratios of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.22-0.60), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25-0.67), and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.15-0.41), respectively.
Conclusion: Horizontal QRS axis accurately predicts CRT response and prognosis in HF patients with LBBB.
Keywords: CRT response; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Horizontal QRS axis; Left bundle branch block.
Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Conduction system pacing compared with biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: Results from International Collaborative LBBAP Study (I-CLAS) Group.Heart Rhythm. 2025 Jun;22(6):1512-1522. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.09.030. Epub 2024 Sep 27. Heart Rhythm. 2025. PMID: 39343119
-
A long-term clinical comparative study of left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block.Heart Vessels. 2025 Aug;40(8):707-717. doi: 10.1007/s00380-024-02512-4. Epub 2025 Jan 3. Heart Vessels. 2025. PMID: 39751868
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy risk stratified by magnetic resonance imaging and optimized by left bundle branch pacing: Results from long-term follow-up of MADURAI LBBP study.Heart Rhythm. 2025 Aug;22(8):2018-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.04.040. Epub 2025 Apr 26. Heart Rhythm. 2025. PMID: 40294735
-
Left bundle branch block-Innocent bystander, silent menace, or both.Heart Rhythm. 2025 Jul;22(7):e229-e236. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.12.038. Epub 2024 Dec 30. Heart Rhythm. 2025. PMID: 39742988 Review.
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy and QRS duration: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Jan;30(1):24-33. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.1.24. Epub 2014 Dec 23. J Korean Med Sci. 2015. PMID: 25552880 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous