Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;22(7):e122-e131.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.011. Epub 2024 Nov 12.

Horizontal QRS axis predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block

Affiliations

Horizontal QRS axis predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block

Zhisheng Chen et al. Heart Rhythm. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Electrocardiogram criteria for left bundle branch block (LBBB) inadequately predict left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony, complicating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidate selection.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the horizontal QRS axis for CRT response in heart failure (HF) patients with LBBB patterns.

Methods: The direction and magnitude of the horizontal QRS axis were calculated using the net amplitudes in leads V2 and V6. CRT response was defined as a ≥10% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and at least 1 New York Heart Association class reduction 1 year after CRT implantation. The composite end point included HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality.

Results: Of 244 consecutive CRT recipients, 156 (63.9%) responded favorably; 88 (36.1%) were nonresponders. The horizontal QRS axis demonstrated significant backward deviation (-75.5° [-79.7° to -69.0°] vs -65.0° [-73.0° to -46.5°]; P < .001) and larger magnitude (35.5 ± 10.9 mm vs 25.5 ± 10.5 mm; P < .001) in CRT responders compared with nonresponders. The direction and magnitude independently predicted CRT response with an area under the curve of 0.778 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.717-0.839) and 0.749 (95% CI, 0.685-0.814), respectively. Combining both parameters increased the area under the curve to 0.814 (95% CI, 0.760-0.868). Moreover, the direction and magnitude of the horizontal QRS axis, or their combination, predicted the composite end point of HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality, with hazard ratios of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.22-0.60), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25-0.67), and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.15-0.41), respectively.

Conclusion: Horizontal QRS axis accurately predicts CRT response and prognosis in HF patients with LBBB.

Keywords: CRT response; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Horizontal QRS axis; Left bundle branch block.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

MeSH terms