Therapeutic serum level for adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: explorative analyses of data from a randomised phase III trial
- PMID: 39537558
- PMCID: PMC11575345
- DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004888
Therapeutic serum level for adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: explorative analyses of data from a randomised phase III trial
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of this study are to identify a therapeutic serum level for adalimumab associated with remission and low disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods: Associations between serum adalimumab trough levels and disease activity were examined using longitudinal data from a 48-week randomised phase III trial including patients with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor-naïve rheumatoid arthritis with active disease starting adalimumab treatment. Disease activity was classified according to 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein (CRP) levels.
Results: Adalimumab trough levels were recorded longitudinally for 336, 330 and 302 patients at weeks 12, 24 and 48, respectively. All patients received concomitant methotrexate. Median adalimumab trough levels were 6.4 mg/L (IQR 3.4-9.5) at week 12, 7.5 mg/L (IQR 3.5-10.9) at week 24 and 7.6 mg/L (IQR 3.6-12.0) at week 48. In serial serum samples from weeks 12, 24 and 48, trough levels ≥3.9 mg/L were associated with DAS28 remission (OR 3.88 (95% CI 1.80, 8.38), p<0.001) and lower CRP levels (p<0.001). Week 12 trough levels ≥3.5 mg/L were associated with DAS28 low disease activity at week 24 (OR 2.62 (1.50, 4.56), p<0.001) and remission at week 48 (OR 1.99 (1.02, 3.88), p=0.04), as well as lower CRP levels at both time points (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Adalimumab trough levels above 4.0 mg/L were associated with remission/low disease activity throughout the first year of adalimumab therapy and can be considered a lower target level for therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab therapy.
Keywords: Adalimumab; Pharmacokinetics; Rheumatoid Arthritis.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: JG and RAK reports funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program under grant agreement No 101095052. DA reports research grants from Lilly and Galapagos and consulting fees from Abbvie, Gilead, J&J, Lilly, MSD, Novartis and Sandoz. EAH reports funding from The Norwegian Regional Health Authorities (inter-regional KLINBEFORSK grants) and The Norwegian Research Council (grant number 328657), speakers' bureaus from Pfizer and UCB; and advisory board participation for Pfizer and AbbVie. SWS reports advisory board participation for AstraZeneca. GG reports personal fees from AbbVie, UCB, Janssen and Novartis. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures






References
-
- Movahedi M, Hepworth E, Mirza R, et al. Discontinuation of biologic therapy due to lack/loss of response and adverse events is similar between TNFi and non-TNFi class: Results from a real-world rheumatoid arthritis cohort. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50:915–22. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.06.020. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous