Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Mar;70(3):968-977.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08728-8. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Fat Absorption in Cystic Fibrosis and Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Proton-Pump Inhibitors and Fat Absorption in Cystic Fibrosis and Pancreatic Insufficiency: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial

Anna Evans Phillips et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Dietary fat malabsorption contributes to poor nutritional status in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). Prescribing gastric acid-reducing agents such as proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) as an adjunct to pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) to improve dietary fat absorption has been accepted in clinical practice despite limited evidence.

Aims: This was a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of subjects aged 12 and older with CF and EPI assessed on placebo and omeprazole to determine if PPI improved the efficacy of PERT as indicated by measures of dietary fat absorption.

Methods: Fat malabsorption via stool coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) and malabsorption blood test (MBT), gastrointestinal pH (wireless motility capsule [WMC]), and quality of life (QOL) were assessed after 14 days on both placebo or PPI (omeprazole).

Results: Total 19 subjects enrolled, 13 were randomized, and 9 provided paired results on placebo and PPI. The 3 subject results for CFA were as follows: 1 increased, 1 decreased, and 1 was within the reference range in both tests for fat absorption. For 9 MBT subjects, 7 decreased and 2 increased fat absorption. For the 4 WMC studies, no change in transit times, nor in pH profiles were noted. No differences were seen in the domains of the two QOL questionnaires comparing placebo and PPI.

Conclusions: These limited descriptive pilot study results in participants with CF and EPI on PERT evaluated by stool, blood, and QOL tests did not suggest improvement in fat absorption attributable to PPI.

Keywords: CFA; Cystic fibrosis; MBT; PERT; Proton-pump inhibitors; WMC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: All authors disclose they have no conflicts of interest related to this project and manuscript. The funding sources had no role in study design, analysis, or drafting of the manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Protocol timeline. PPI proton-pump inhibitor, MBT malabsorption blood test, WMC wireless motility capsule
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Measured gastrointestinal transit (a) and post-stomach small intestinal pH (b) profiles on and off treatment. CTT Colonic transit time, GET gastric emptying time, GTT gastric transit time, PPI proton-pump inhibitor, SBTT small bowel transit time, SLBTT small-large bowel transit time, WGTT whole gut transit time
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PROMIS and PROMIS-GI selected domains: 3a Reflux, 3b Belly Pain, 3c Gas and Bloating, 3d Constipation, 3e Adult Pain, and 3f Adult Depression. PROMIS measure domains are reported on a T-score, where 50 is the mean of the reference population. Higher numbers indicate more of the domain being measured. PROMIS Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CFQ-R selected domains: 3a Physical, 3b Emotion, 3c Eating, 3d Treatment Burden, 3e Respiratory, and 3f Digest. The CFQ-R is a disease-specific measure for patients with cystic fibrosis, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life in the domain being measured. CFQ-R Cystic fibrosis questionnaire–revised

References

    1. Ng SM, Moore HS. Drug therapies for reducing gastric acidity in people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;4:CD003424. 10.1002/14651858.CD003424.pub5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Omari TI, Haslam RR, Lundborg P et al. Effect of omeprazole on acid gastroesophageal reflux and gastric acidity in preterm infants with pathological acid reflux. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2007;44:41–44. 10.1097/01.mpg.0000252190.97545.07. - PubMed
    1. Orel R, Benninga MA, Broekaert IJ et al. Drugs in focus: proton-pump inhibitors. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2021;72:645–653. 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003063. - PubMed
    1. DiMagno EP. Gastric acid suppression and treatment of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2001;15:477–486. 10.1053/bega.2001.0195. - PubMed
    1. Borowitz DS, Grand RJ, Durie PR. Use of pancreatic enzyme supplements for patients with cystic fibrosis in the context of fibrosing colonopathy. J Pediatr 1995;127:681–684. 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70153-2. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms