Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;32(2):899-911.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16484-2. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks

Affiliations

Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks

Puneet Singh et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) is the surgical removal of both breasts to reduce the risk of cancer. In this Society of Surgical Oncology position statement, we review the literature addressing the indications, outcomes, and risks of BRRM to update the society's 2017 statement. We held a virtual meeting to outline key topics and conducted a literature search using PubMed to identify relevant articles. After literature review, recommendations were made according to group consensus. Individuals with a high lifetime risk of breast cancer due to pathogenic variants in high penetrance breast cancer-predisposition genes, early chest or breast radiation exposure, or a compelling family history should be counseled on the option of BRRM. However, BRRM is not recommended for most patients with high-risk lesions and may be contraindicated in patients who have other competing cancers and/or a high risk of surgical complications. BRRM effectively reduces the risk of breast cancer development, although the survival benefit is unclear. For patients with low-to-moderate breast cancer risk, alternative management strategies should be encouraged, including lifestyle modifications, high-risk screening, and risk-reducing medications. Discussions of BRRM should cover: (1) breast-cancer risk estimates; (2) the procedure's degree of risk reduction and impact on survival; (3) surgical techniques, potential surgical complications and long-term sequelae; and (4) alternatives to surgery. Surgeons should encourage shared and informed decision making with patients who have an elevated lifetime risk of developing breast cancer.

Keywords: Bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy; Breast cancer; Breast cancer-predisposition gene; High-risk lesion; High-risk screening; Nipple-sparing mastectomy; Risk reduction; Risk-reducing medication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: Oluwadamilola M. Fayanju has received research support from Gilead Sciences, Inc. that is outside the scope of this work. Chantal Reyna has received an honoraria from Elucent Medical that is outside the scope of this work and the relationship has been terminated. Anna Weiss reports the following disclosures: advisory board/consulting fees from Merck and Myriad Laboratories, Inc.; honoraria from the Society of Breast Imaging, MJH Lifesciences, and Breast Cancer Foundation New Zealand; food and beverage from Endomag. Judy C. Boughey receives funding, paid to her institution, from Eli Lilly and SymBioSis, and sits on the Data Safety Monitoring Committee of Cairns Surgical. She has received honoraria from PER, PeerView, OncLive, EndoMag, and Up-To-Date. Andrea V. Barrio has received a speaking honorarium from Novartis. Jennifer K. Plichta serves on a committee for the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. She has received grant funding from Earlier.org that is outside the scope of this work, and has received honoraria from the National Consortium of Breast Centers. Marie Catherine Lee is a paid consultant for Elucent Medical and Provepharm. Puneet Singh, Doreen M. Agnese, Miral Amin, Astrid Botty van den Bruele, Erin E. Burke, David N. Danforth Jr, Frederick M. Dirbas, Firas Eladoumikdachi, Olga Kantor, Shicha Kumar, Cindy Matsen, Toan T. Nguyen, Tolga Ozmen, Ko Un Park, Shayna L. Showalter, Toncred Styblo, Nicholas Tranakas, Ashley Woodfin, and Christine Laronga have no conflicts of interest to declare that may be relevant to the contents of this work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hunt KK, Euhus DM, Boughey JC, et al. Society of surgical oncology breast disease working group statement on prophylactic (risk-reducing) mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(2):375–97. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5688-z . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giuliano AE, Boolbol S, Degnim A, Kuerer H, Leitch AM, Morrow M. Society of surgical oncology: position statement on prophylactic mastectomy. Approved by the Society of Surgical Oncology Executive Council, March 2007. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(9):2425–7. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9447-z . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh P, Agnese D, Amin M, et al. Society of surgical oncology breast disease site working group statement on contralateral mastectomy: indications, outcomes, and risks. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024;31(4):2212–23. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-14893-x . - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, and pancreatic (Version 2.2024). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_bop.pdf . Accessed 19 Oct 2023.
    1. Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(3):676–89. - PubMed - PMC - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources