Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2024 Nov 13;12(1):653.
doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02170-1.

Religiosity, perceived family support, and gender disclosure of LGBTQ + medical students in Thailand

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Religiosity, perceived family support, and gender disclosure of LGBTQ + medical students in Thailand

Pakawat Wiwattanaworaset et al. BMC Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: The well-being of LGBTQ + medical students can be influenced by religiosity, family support, and the disclosure of their gender identity or sexual orientation. These factors have frequently been overlooked and warrant further consideration in creating a supportive environment for all students.

Methods: This multicenter study investigated two main outcomes including the differences in religiosity and perceived family support between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + medical students in Thailand, and the gender disclosure to family among LGBTQ + medical students. It was conducted among students from five medical schools across Thailand, using online questionnaires during the academic year 2021-2022. Data were collected on demographic characteristics, religiosity, gender identity/sexual orientation disclosure to family, and perceived family support. Comparisons between groups were conducted using chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results: Of the 1,322 participants, 31.2% identified themselves as LGBTQ+, among whom 81.8% were Buddhists. The proportion of non-religious LGBTQ + students was significantly higher (vs. non-LGBTQ+; 15.0% vs. 8.4%, respectively; p = 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in religiosity between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + students as well as between LGBTQ + subgroups. Although, 74% of LGBTQ + students reported good family support, significantly more LGBTQ + students perceived poor family support (vs. non-LGBTQ+, 7.0% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.002). Regarding the disclosure of gender identity or sexual orientation to the family, the majority of LGBTQ + individuals indicated either a non-disclosure or uncertainty. There were significant associations between perceived family support and the likelihood of disclosing one's identity to family members, as better perceived support was associated with higher disclosure rates.

Conclusions: No statistically significant difference in religiosity was found between LGBTQ + and non-LGBTQ + students. The majority of LGBTQ + medical students reported receiving good family support; however, among those who perceived their family's support to be lacking, there was a greater tendency to conceal their gender identity from their families. For future studies, it is crucial to investigate whether this concealment extends to other spheres of their lives and to assess the potential impact on their well-being, including mental health and quality of life.

Keywords: Family; Gender diversity; LGBTQ+; Medical student; Religiosity; Support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations Ethical approval and consent to participate This study was approved by Institutional Review Boards at each site: Mahidol University (167/2022), Chulalongkorn University (0006/2022), Khon Kaen University (HE651083), Prince of Songkla University (65-085-3-1), and Chiang Mai University (PSY-2565-08832). Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all participants. Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Conflict of interest The authors report no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, or publication of this article.

Similar articles

References

    1. Moagi MM, van Der Wath AE, Jiyane PM, Rikhotso RS. Mental health challenges of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people: An integrated literature review. Health SA [Internet]. 20210120th ed. 2021;26:1487. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604059 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ling HN, Ting SH. Demographic factors influencing tolerance towards LGBT individuals among malaysians. Hum Behav Dev Soc. 2022;23:30–41.
    1. Stibich M. What is religion? The psychology of why people believe [Internet]. Vol. 2023. 2022 [cited 2023 May 1]. https://www.verywellmind.com/religion-improves-health-2224007#:~:text=Re...
    1. UNDP USAID. Being LGBT in Asia: Thailand country report. Bangkok; 2014.
    1. Winzer L, Samutachak B, Gray R. Religiosity, spirituality, and happiness in Thailand from the perspective of Buddhism. J Popul Social Stud. 2018;26(4):332–43.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources