Authors' response
- PMID: 39539117
- DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.15660
Authors' response
References
REFERENCES
-
- Duez P, Weller T, Brubaker M, Hockensmith RE, Lilien R. Development and validation of a virtual examination tool for firearm forensics. J Forensic Sci. 2018;63(4):1069–1084. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556‐4029.13668
-
- Human factors committee, Organization of Scientific Area Committees for forensic science. Human factors in validation and performance testing of forensic science. OSAC Technical Series 0004. 2020;11–1084. [Cited 2024 Jul 23] Available from: https://www.nist.gov/organization‐scientific‐area‐committees‐forensic‐sc....
-
- President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Report to the President—Forensic science in criminal courts: ensuring scientific validity of feature‐comparison methods. 2016. [Cited 2024 Jul 23] Available from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp...
-
- Gutierrez RE, Prokesch EJ. The false promise of firearms examination validation studies: lay controls, simplistic comparisons, and the failure to soundly measure misidentification rates. J Forensic Sci. 2024;69(4):1334–1349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556‐4029.15531
-
- Zheng X, Soons J, Thompson R, Singh S, Constantin C. NIST ballistics toolmark research database. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2020;125:125004. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.125.004
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources