Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 15;5(11):1090-1094.
doi: 10.1002/bco2.446. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Reliability of mpMRI in diagnosing cancer prostate following intravesical BCG for bladder cancer

Affiliations

Reliability of mpMRI in diagnosing cancer prostate following intravesical BCG for bladder cancer

Arjun Pon Avudaiappan et al. BJUI Compass. .

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 30;5(12):1324-1329. doi: 10.1002/bco2.482. eCollection 2024 Dec. BJUI Compass. 2024. PMID: 39744071 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: Detecting carcinoma prostate (CaP) after intravesical Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) immunotherapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) poses diagnostic challenges. Granulomatous prostatitis (GP) has an incidence of 0.8%-3.3% in post-intravesical BCG patients and 6% incidence in a PIRADS 5 lesion on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Patients with GP after intravesical BCG may have clinical, biochemical, and radiological features similar to CaP. In our study, we evaluate the reliability of mpMRI in diagnosing CaP after intravesical BCG therapy.

Materials and methods: We reviewed the NMIBC patients treated with intravesical BCG therapy between 2017 and 2023 and investigated those who underwent mpMRI and MR fusion biopsy in suspicion of CaP. A total of 120 patients had intravesical BCG immunotherapy, and 10 patients met our selection criteria. We performed a descriptive analysis of these patients and assessed the sensitivity and specificity of mpMRI in diagnosing CaP.

Results: The sensitivity of mpMRI in detecting CaP was 100%, and the specificity was 28.6%. Similarly, the negative predictive value for detecting CaP was 100%, and the positive predictive value was 37.5%. Among patients evaluated with mpMRI, a PIRADS 4 or 5 lesion was seen in 8 (80%) patients, and there was no lesion in 2 (20%) patients. The mpMRI detected 1 lesion in 6 patients (60%) and 2 (20%) in 2 patients. The lesions had a PIRADS score of 4 and 5 in 6 (60%) and 2 (20%) patients, respectively. Among these lesions, 8 (80%) were in the peripheral zone and 2 (20%) in the transition zone. In the MR fusion biopsy of these 10 patients, 7 (70%) had granulomatous prostatitis, and 3 (30%) had CaP.

Conclusion: In our study on evaluating the reliability of mpMRI in diagnosing CaP among post-intravesical BCG patients, we noted that although PIRADS in mpMRI had high sensitivity in identifying prostate lesions, its specificity for detecting CaP is limited.

Keywords: cancer prostate; granulomatous prostatitis; intravesical BCG; mpMRI; non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Distribution of granulomatous prostatitis and carcinoma prostate based on PIRADS score.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
mpMRI images of granulomatous prostatitis and carcinoma prostate showing T2 weighed, diffusion weighed, and dynamic contrast enhancement imaging mpMRI of a post‐intravesical BCG patient with granulomatous prostatitis in axial images showing a 3.6 × 0.8 cm lesion located in the right mid and lower gland extending to the right apex of the prostate in (A) T2 weighted, (B) diffusion‐weighted, and (C) dynamic contrast imaging; mpMRI of a post‐intravesical BCG patient with carcinoma prostate in axial images showing a 1.5 cm lesion located in the left posterior and postero‐lateral peripheral zone of the prostate in (D) T2 weighted, (E) diffusion‐weighted, and (F) dynamic contrast imaging.

References

    1. Flaig TW, Spiess PE, Abern M, Agarwal N, Bangs R, Boorjian SA, et al. NCCN guidelines® insights: bladder cancer, version 2.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(8):866–878. 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brausi M, Oddens J, Sylvester R, Bono A, van de Beek C, van Andel G, et al. Side effects of Bacillus Calmette‐Guérin (BCG) in the treatment of intermediate‐ and high‐risk Ta, T1 papillary carcinoma of the bladder: results of the EORTC genito‐urinary cancers group randomised phase 3 study comparing one‐third dose with full dose and 1 year with 3 years of maintenance BCG. Eur Urol 2014;65(1):69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.07.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee S, Oh YT, Kim HM, Jung DC, Hong H. Imaging patterns of bacillus Calmette‐Guérin‐related granulomatous prostatitis based on multiparametric MRI. Korean J Radiol. 2022;23(1):60–67. 10.3348/kjr.2020.1369 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stillwell TJ, Engen DE, Farrow GM. The clinical spectrum of granulomatous prostatitis: a report of 200 cases. J Urol. 1987;138(2):320–323. 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43134-x PMID: PubMed PMID: 3599248. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balasar M, Doğan M, Kandemir A, Taskapu HH, Cicekci F, Toy H, et al. Investigation of granulomatous prostatitis incidence following intravesical BCG therapy. Int. J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(6):1554–1557. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources