Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 15;5(11):1106-1113.
doi: 10.1002/bco2.413. eCollection 2024 Nov.

The accuracy of ultrasensitive PSA in predicting disease progression after radical prostatectomy

Affiliations

The accuracy of ultrasensitive PSA in predicting disease progression after radical prostatectomy

Heikki Seikkula et al. BJUI Compass. .

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 30;5(12):1324-1329. doi: 10.1002/bco2.482. eCollection 2024 Dec. BJUI Compass. 2024. PMID: 39744071 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the role of ultrasensitive PSA values (usPSA) after radical prostatectomy in predicting the subsequent biochemical recurrence (BCR).

Material and methods: The study included 1836 patients who underwent open or robot-assisted RP at Turku University Hospital between 2003 and 2018. Exclusion criteria involved patients with adjuvant treatments and those who did not reach a PSA nadir <0.1 ng/ml, resulting in a final cohort of 1313 patients. The prognostic impact of the optimal usPSA nadir cut-off value 6 months after RP was investigated to predict subsequent BCR for the whole cohort (N = 1313). The optimal usPSA cut-off value was determined for patients at 3-5 years post-surgery (N = 806) and beyond 5 years (N = 493) of follow-up. We used the area under the curve (AUC) calculation and the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: In a cohort with a median age of 64, primarily featuring Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. uPSA nadir of 0.01 ng/ml (AUC = 0.80) at the first monitoring post-surgery emerged as the optimal cut-off for identifying subjects at low (80%) or high (20%) risk of BCR within the first 3 years. Beyond this period, uPSA values during the first 3 [(AUC = 0.89; 3-5 years post-surgery) and (AUC = 0.81; beyond 5 years)] and 5 post-surgery years (AUC = 0.85) outperformed uPSA nadir in predicting subsequent BCR. Notably, EAU-defined high-risk patients with low uPSA nadir maintained substantial BCR-free survival.

Conclusion: In conclusion, a low usPSA predicts minimal BCR risk over the next 2-3 years post-measurement. Patients with low usPSA can benefit from reduced post-surgery PSA monitoring at 2- to 3-year intervals without compromising outcomes. This strategic approach optimizes resource allocation in busy urological outpatient clinics, especially valuable in publicly reimbursed healthcare systems like Finland.

Keywords: biochemical recurrence; prostate‐specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; radical prostatectomy; ultrasensitive prostate‐specific antigen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A study flowchart.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Biochemical progression free survival stratified by low usPSA levels and EAU prostate cancer risk groups. (A) Time point 1, that is, usPSA nadir. Under, usPSA nadir <0.010 ng/ml; over, usPSA nadir ≥0.010. (B) Time point 2, that is, usPSA level during first 3 years post‐surgery. Under, usPSA nadir <0.025 ng/ml; over, usPSA nadir ≥0.025. (C) Time point 3 i.e. usPSA level during first 5 years post‐surgery. Under, usPSA nadir <0.023 ng/ml; over, usPSA‐nadir ≥0.023. Prostate cancer risk group based on EAU guidelines: low risk, PSA ≤ 20, Gleason <8 or pathological T‐stage (pT) < 3; high risk, PSA > 20, Gleason ≥8 or pT ≥ 3. Lines: Red, high EAU risk and usPSA over cut‐off; green, high EAU risk and usPSA under cut‐off; blue, low EAU risk and usPSA under cut‐off; purple, low EAU risk and usPSA under cut‐off.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] BJUI Compass. 2024 Dec 30;5(12):1324-1329. doi: 10.1002/bco2.482. eCollection 2024 Dec. BJUI Compass. 2024. PMID: 39744071 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Sanda MG, Cadeddu JA, Kirkby E, Chen RC, Crispino T, Fontanarosa J, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline. Part II: recommended approaches and details of specific care options. J. Urol. 2018;199(4):990–997. 10.1016/j.juro.2018.01.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Briers E, Bolla M, Bourke L, Cornford P, et al. EAU–ESTRO–ESUR–SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer 2020. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/prostate-cancer/
    1. Ferguson RA, Yu H, Kalyvas M, Zammit S, Diamandis EP. Ultrasensitive detection of prostate‐specific antigen by a time‐resolved immunofluorometric assay and the Immulite immunochemiluminescent third‐generation assay: potential applications in prostate and breast cancers. Clin. Chem. 1996;42(5):675–684. 10.1093/clinchem/42.5.675 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eisenberg ML, Davies BJ, Cooperberg MR, Cowan JE, Carroll PR. Prognostic implications of an undetectable ultrasensitive prostate‐specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 2010;57(4):622–629. 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.077 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shen S, Lepor H, Yaffee R, Taneja SS. Ultrasensitive serum prostate specific antigen nadir accurately predicts the risk of early relapse after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2005;173(3):777–780. 10.1097/01.ju.0000153619.33446.60 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources