Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 9:17:8611-8623.
doi: 10.2147/JIR.S486692. eCollection 2024.

The Predictive Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Total Occlusion Patients Who Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Yuhao Zhao #  1 , Shun Zhao #  1 , Yuchen Shi  1 , Qin Ma  1 , Ze Zheng  1 , Ping Wang  1 , Jinghua Liu  1
Affiliations

The Predictive Value of the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index for Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Total Occlusion Patients Who Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Yuhao Zhao et al. J Inflamm Res. .

Abstract

Background: There is limited research on the long-term prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) patients who have previously undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Additionally, the prognostic value of a novel systemic immune inflammation index (SII) in this specific patient population remains unclear.

Methods: To adjust for differences in baseline features and minimize bias, 335 pairs of patients with or without prior CABG undergone PCI were obtained after probability score matching (PSM) in a single-center cohort. The clinical characteristics were collected, and the primary outcomes were major cardiovascular events (MACE), which included all-cause death, nonfatal MI and unplanned revascularization, were recorded during the follow-up period after discharge. The group with prior CABG were divided according to the median level of SII: Lower SII group (SII ≤ 570.10, N = 167) and higher SII group (SII ≥ 570.10, N = 168).

Results: The SII values were significantly higher in the prior CABG group than in the without prior CABG group [570.10 (444.60, 814.12) vs 519.65 (446.86, 565.84), P < 0.001, respectively]. The survival Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with prior CABG was significantly associated with a higher risk of MACE than patients without prior CABG (P = 0.016) in the long-term follow-up. As SII levels increased, the cumulative risk of MACE became significantly higher in the patients with prior CABG (P = 0.023) stratified by the median value of SII. The Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis indicated that the level of SII (hazard ratio = 2.035, 95% CI, 1.103-3.753, P = 0.023) emerged as independent predictors of MACE. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis illustrated that the HR for MACE increased with increasing SII.

Conclusion: SII is a reliable predictor of long-term cardiovascular events after PCI in CTO patients with prior CABG, suggesting that SII may be helpful in identifying high-risk patients who need more aggressive treatment and follow-up strategies.

Keywords: coronary artery bypass grafting; coronary chronic total occlusion; major adverse cardiovascular events; percutaneous coronary intervention; systemic immune inflammation index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Population flow chart of enrolled patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the incidence of MACE. (A) patients with or without prior CABG; (B) patients with prior CABG stratified by the median value of SII.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Subgroup analysis of the predictive value of SII for MACE in CTO patients with prior CABG.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for inflammatory index in predicting MACE.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The restricted cubic spline of MACE and the SII in CABG group.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Kandzari DE, Lembo NJ, Carlson HD, et al. Procedural, clinical, and health status outcomes in chronic total coronary occlusion revascularization: results from the PERSPECTIVE study. Catheter Cardio Inte. 2020;96(3):567–576. doi:10.1002/ccd.28494 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guo L, Meng S, Lv H, et al. Long-term outcomes of successful recanalization compared with optimal medical therapy for coronary chronic total occlusions in patients with and without left ventricular systolic. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:654730. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.654730. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mehran R, Claessen BE, Godino C, et al. Long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions. Jacc-Cardiovasc Int. 2011;4(9):952–961. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nairooz R, Parzynski CS, Curtis JP, et al. Contemporary trends, predictors and outcomes of perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2020;130:37–45. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sabatine MS, Bergmark BA, Murphy SA, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2021;398(10318):2247–2257. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02334-5 - DOI - PubMed