Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 4;151(5):277-287.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.070454. Epub 2024 Nov 14.

A Proteomics-Based Approach for Prediction of Different Cardiovascular Diseases and Dementia

Affiliations

A Proteomics-Based Approach for Prediction of Different Cardiovascular Diseases and Dementia

Frederick K Ho et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: Many studies have explored whether individual plasma protein biomarkers improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction. We sought to investigate the use of a plasma proteomics-based approach in predicting different cardiovascular outcomes.

Methods: Among 51 859 UK Biobank participants (mean age, 56.7 years; 45.5% male) without cardiovascular disease and with proteomics measurements, we examined the primary composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease, stroke, or heart failure (major adverse cardiovascular events), as well as additional secondary cardiovascular outcomes. An exposome-wide association study was conducted using relative protein concentrations, adjusted for a range of classic, demographic, and lifestyle risk factors. A prediction model using only age, sex, and protein markers (protein model) was developed using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-regularized approach (derivation: 80% of cohort) and validated using split-sample testing (20% of cohort). Their performance was assessed by comparing calibration, net reclassification index, and c statistic with the PREVENT (Predicting Risk of CVD Events) risk score.

Results: Over a median 13.6 years of follow-up, 4857 participants experienced first major adverse cardiovascular events. After adjustment, the proteins most strongly associated with major adverse cardiovascular events included NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; hazard ratio [HR], 1.68 per SD increase), proADM (pro-adrenomedullin; HR, 1.60), GDF-15 (growth differentiation factor-15; HR, 1.47), WFDC2 (WAP four-disulfide core domain protein 2; HR, 1.46), and IGFBP4 (insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4; HR, 1.41). In total, 222 separate proteins were predictors of all outcomes of interest in the protein model, and 86 were selected for the primary outcome specifically. In the validation cohort, compared with the PREVENT risk factor model, the protein model improved net reclassification (net reclassification index +0.09), and c statistic (+0.051) for major adverse cardiovascular events. The protein model also improved the prediction of other outcomes, including ASCVD (c statistic +0.035), myocardial infarction (+0.023), stroke (+0.024), aortic stenosis (+0.015), heart failure (+0.060), abdominal aortic aneurysm (+0.024), and dementia (+0.068).

Conclusions: Measurement of targeted protein biomarkers produced superior prediction of aggregated and disaggregated cardiovascular events. This study represents proof of concept for the application of targeted proteomics in predicting a range of cardiovascular outcomes.

Keywords: cardiovascular diseases; proteomics; risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Prof Welsh reports grant income from Roche Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novartis, outside the submitted work, and speaker fees from Novo Nordisk and Raisio, outside the submitted work. Prof Woodward has recently been a consultant to Amgen and Freeline. Prof Mills has received personal fees from Abbott Diagnostics, Roche Diagnostics, Siemens Healthineers, and LumiraDx, and has received a grant awarded to the University of Edinburgh from Abbott Diagnostics and Siemens Healthineers outside the submitted work. Prof Sattar has consulted for and/or received speaker honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hanmi Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Menarini-Ricerche, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche Diagnostics, and Sanofi; and received grant support paid to his University from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Roche Diagnostics outside the submitted work. Dr Lees reports personal speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca. Prof Mark reports speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pharmacomsos, Astellas, GSK, and Vifor, and grants from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. Dr Kimenai has received honoraria from Roche Diagnostics. Prof McMurray reports payments through Glasgow University from work on clinical trials, consulting, and other activities from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, GSK, KBP Biosciences, and Novartis; personal consultancy fees from Alnylam Pharma, Bayer, BMS, George Clinical PTY Ltd, Ionis Pharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharma, and River 2 Renal Corporation; and personal lecture fees from Abbott, Alkem Metabolics, Astra Zeneca, Blue Ocean Scientific Solutions Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge, Emcure Pharma Ltd, Eris Lifesciences, European Academy of CME, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Imagica Health, Intas Pharma, J.B. Chemicals & Pharma Ltd, Lupin Pharma, Medscape/Heart.Org, ProAdWise Communications, Radcliffe Cardiology, Sun Pharma, The Corpus, Translation Research Group, and Translational Medicine Academy; and is a director of Global Clinical Trial Partners Ltd. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by