Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan;66(1):47-59.
doi: 10.1111/epi.18180. Epub 2024 Nov 14.

Epilepsy-pregnancy registries: An update

Affiliations
Review

Epilepsy-pregnancy registries: An update

Piero Perucca et al. Epilepsia. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

This report is the first comprehensive update on the activities of existing epilepsy-pregnancy registries since 2010. The primary aim of these registries, which were initiated by independent international research groups some 25 years ago, has been to assess the risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) in offspring exposed in utero to different antiseizure medications (ASMs). Progress reports are provided here from the five original registries (the International Registry of Antiepileptic Drugs and Pregnancy EURAP, the North American Antiepileptic Drug Pregnancy Registry, the UK and Ireland Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register, the Kerala Registry of Epilepsy and Pregnancy, and the Raoul Wallenberg Australian Pregnancy Register of Antiepileptic Drugs) plus the more recently initiated West China Registry. Since their inception, the registries have published a wealth of data revealing important differences in risks across the most frequently used ASM treatments, thereby facilitating rational management of women with epilepsy who are of childbearing potential. Although the number of pregnancies enrolled in the different registries has more than doubled since the 2010 report, many questions remain. These include outcomes following prenatal exposure to most of the newer ASMs or different ASM combinations, as well as associations with specific MCMs rather than MCMs as a collective. All the registries, therefore, remain active and continue to enroll pregnancies. Administrative health care databases have been utilized more recently for the assessment of MCM risks and other adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with in utero exposure to ASMs. Although these can provide population-based complementary information, they cannot replace the specific epilepsy-pregnancy registries with their more detailed validated individual information. Given the multiple newer ASMs that are increasingly used and the continuing multiple knowledge gaps for the older ASMs, epilepsy-pregnancy registries will continue to play an important role in the future.

Keywords: antiseizure medications; congenital malformations; epilepsy; pregnancy; registries; teratogenicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Tomson T, Battino D, Craig J, Hernandez‐Diaz S, Holmes LB, Lindhout D, et al. Pregnancy registries: differences, similarities, and possible harmonization. Epilepsia. 2010;51:909–915.
    1. Morrow J, Russell A, Guthrie E, Parsons L, Robertson I, Waddell R, et al. Malformation risks of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy: A Prospective Study from the UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77:193–198.
    1. Holmes LB, Wyszynski DF, Lieberman E. The AED (antiepileptic drug) pregnancy registry: a 6‐year experience. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:673–678.
    1. Eurap Study Group. Seizure control and treatment in pregnancy: observations from the EURAP Epilepsy Pregnancy Registry. Neurology. 2006;14(66):354–360.
    1. Thomas SV, Ajaykumar B, Sindhu K, Nair MK, George B, Sarma PS. Motor and mental development of infants exposed to antiepileptic drugs in utero. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;13:229–236.

MeSH terms

Substances