Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;6(6):e230419.
doi: 10.1148/ryct.230419.

Accelerated Cardiac MRI with Deep Learning-based Image Reconstruction for Cine Imaging

Affiliations

Accelerated Cardiac MRI with Deep Learning-based Image Reconstruction for Cine Imaging

Ann-Christin Klemenz et al. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose To assess the influence of deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction on acquisition time, volumetric results, and image quality of cine sequences in cardiac MRI. Materials and Methods This prospective study (performed from January 2023 to March 2023) included 55 healthy volunteers who underwent a noncontrast cardiac MRI examination at 1.5 T. Short-axis stack DL cine sequences of the left ventricle (LV) were performed over one (1RR), three (3RR), and six cardiac (6RR) cycles and compared with a standard cine sequence (without DL, performed over 10-12 cardiac cycles) in regard to acquisition time, subjective image quality, edge sharpness, and volumetric results. Results Total acquisition time (median) for a short-axis stack was 47 seconds for the 1RR cine, 108 seconds for 3RR cine, 184 seconds for 6RR cine, and 227 seconds for the standard sequence. Volumetric results showed no difference for the conventional cine (median LV ejection fraction [EF] 63%), 6RR cine (median LVEF, 62%), and 3RR cine (median LVEF, 61%). The 1RR cine sequence significantly underestimated EF (57%) because of a different segmentation of the papillary muscles. Subjective image quality (P = .37) and edge sharpness (P = .06) of the three-heartbeat DL cine did not differ from the reference standard, while both metrics were lower for single-heartbeat DL cine and higher for six-heartbeat DL cine. Conclusion For DL-based cine sequences, acquisition over three cardiac cycles appears to be the optimal compromise, with no evidence of differences in image quality, edge sharpness, and volumetric results, but with a greater than 50% reduced acquisition time compared with the reference sequence. Keywords: MR Imaging, Cardiac, Heart, Technical Aspects, Cardiac MRI, Deep Learning, Clinical Imaging, Accelerated Imaging Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Keywords: Accelerated Imaging; Cardiac; Cardiac MRI; Clinical Imaging; Deep Learning; Heart; MR Imaging; Technical Aspects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of conflicts of interest: A.C.K. No relevant relationships. L.R. No relevant relationships. M.G. Employee of GE HealthCare. M.M. No relevant relationships. X.Z. Employee of GE HealthCare. A.D. No relevant relationships. R.L. No relevant relationships. C.I.L. No relevant relationships. M.A.W. No relevant relationships. F.G.M. No relevant relationships.

Figures

Visualization of acquisition schemes. For a cardiac MRI cine
acquisition, the k-space is divided into segments (colored boxes), and each
segment needs to be sampled in all cardiac phases, as seen in the lower part
of the figure. For a standard sequence (right), the k-space is sampled
uniformly, resulting in the segments having equal size. For variable density
sampling (left), the outer k-space segments have fewer points, and hence, a
larger segment can be acquired within the same time. The segment size is
adjusted to the sampling density, resulting in fewer segments overall and
hence, an accelerated acquisition.
Figure 1:
Visualization of acquisition schemes. For a cardiac MRI cine acquisition, the k-space is divided into segments (colored boxes), and each segment needs to be sampled in all cardiac phases, as seen in the lower part of the figure. For a standard sequence (right), the k-space is sampled uniformly, resulting in the segments having equal size. For variable density sampling (left), the outer k-space segments have fewer points, and hence, a larger segment can be acquired within the same time. The segment size is adjusted to the sampling density, resulting in fewer segments overall and hence, an accelerated acquisition.
Schematic representation of deep learning–based image
reconstruction. An unrolled neural network is used in DLCine to reconstruct
cine images from the undersampled k-space data. The network includes
multiple iterations (unrolled blocks), with each block containing a data
consistency module and a neural network–based regularizer.
Figure 2:
Schematic representation of deep learning–based image reconstruction. An unrolled neural network is used in DLCine to reconstruct cine images from the undersampled k-space data. The network includes multiple iterations (unrolled blocks), with each block containing a data consistency module and a neural network–based regularizer.
Quantification of edge sharpness. (Top) Axial noncontrast cardiac cine
MR images for each sequence type, with red profile line. (Bottom) Graphs
show the normalized intensity profile and regression line over the blood to
myocardium transition for edge sharpness determination. Cnorm = normalized
intensity profile, C̃norm = intensity profile used for edge sharpness
calculation, C'norm = first derivative of Cnorm' f(si) =
linear regression of intensity profile used for edge sharpness calculation,
LenProfile = length of profile line from blood pool to myocardium, 1RR = one
cardiac cycle cine sequence, Ref = reference sequence, s = distance, 6RR =
six cardiac cycles cine sequence, 3RR = three cardiac cycles cine
sequence.
Figure 3:
Quantification of edge sharpness. (Top) Axial noncontrast cardiac cine MR images for each sequence type, with red profile line. (Bottom) Graphs show the normalized intensity profile and regression line over the blood to myocardium transition for edge sharpness determination. Cnorm = normalized intensity profile, norm = intensity profile used for edge sharpness calculation, C'norm = first derivative of Cnorm' f(si) = linear regression of intensity profile used for edge sharpness calculation, LenProfile = length of profile line from blood pool to myocardium, 1RR = one cardiac cycle cine sequence, Ref = reference sequence, s = distance, 6RR = six cardiac cycles cine sequence, 3RR = three cardiac cycles cine sequence.
Image examples in a healthy volunteer (31-year-old male). Axial
noncontrast cardiac MR images from reference cine sequence, one cardiac
cycle (1RR) cine, three cardiac cycles (3RR) cine, and six cardiac cycles
(6RR) cine are shown. Cine video files from this case are available as
Movies 1–4.
Figure 4:
Image examples in a healthy volunteer (31-year-old male). Axial noncontrast cardiac MR images from reference cine sequence, one cardiac cycle (1RR) cine, three cardiac cycles (3RR) cine, and six cardiac cycles (6RR) cine are shown. Cine video files from this case are available as Movies 1–4.
Volumetric results. Box plots show the results for LV EDV, LV ESV, LV
SV, and LV mass indexed to body surface area for reference, one cardiac
cycle (1RR), three cardiac cycles (3RR), and six cardiac cycles (6RR) cine
sequences. Boxes represent the 5%–95% interval. The line inside each
box indicates the median. Whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values.
LV EDV = left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LV ESV = left ventricular
end-systolic volume, LV SV = left ventricular stroke volume.
Figure 5:
Volumetric results. Box plots show the results for LV EDV, LV ESV, LV SV, and LV mass indexed to body surface area for reference, one cardiac cycle (1RR), three cardiac cycles (3RR), and six cardiac cycles (6RR) cine sequences. Boxes represent the 5%–95% interval. The line inside each box indicates the median. Whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values. LV EDV = left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LV ESV = left ventricular end-systolic volume, LV SV = left ventricular stroke volume.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kramer CM , Barkhausen J , Bucciarelli-Ducci C , Flamm SD , Kim RJ , Nagel E . Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update . J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2020. ; 22 ( 1 ): 17 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Emrich T , Halfmann M , Schoepf UJ , Kreitner K-F . CMR for myocardial characterization in ischemic heart disease: state-of-the-art and future developments . Eur Radiol Exp 2021. ; 5 ( 1 ): 14 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mazurowski MA , Buda M , Saha A , Bashir MR . Deep learning in radiology: An overview of the concepts and a survey of the state of the art with focus on MRI . J Magn Reson Imaging 2019. ; 49 ( 4 ): 939 – 954 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Currie G , Hawk KE , Rohren E , Vial A , Klein R . Machine learning and deep learning in medical imaging: intelligent imaging . J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2019. ; 50 ( 4 ): 477 – 487 . - PubMed
    1. Orii M , Sone M , Osaki T , et al. . Reliability of respiratory-gated real-time two-dimensional cine incorporating deep learning reconstruction for the assessment of ventricular function in an adult population . Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023. ; 39 ( 5 ): 1001 – 1011 . - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources