Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 14;135(1):e187001.
doi: 10.1172/JCI187001.

Complement-producing maternal microchimeric cells override infection susceptibility in complement-deficient murine offspring

Complement-producing maternal microchimeric cells override infection susceptibility in complement-deficient murine offspring

Giang Pham et al. J Clin Invest. .
No abstract available

Keywords: Bacterial infections; Genetic diseases; Infectious disease; Organ transplantation; Reproductive biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. C3+/– MMcs override complement deficiency in C3–/– mice.
(A) Schematic comparing C3+/–, C3–/–, and C3 NIMA mice, or C3 NIMA mice after MMc depletion or displacement. d20, day 20. (B) Serum C3 levels in the male (square) or female (circle) mice described in A. (C) E. coli CFU after infection for male C3+/–, C3–/–, C3 NIMA, and C3 NIMA mice depleted of OVA+ MMcs using anti-OVA IgG. (D) Genome equivalent (GEq) OVA DNA specific to OVA+ MMcs in male C3 OVA NIMA mice 14 days after anti-OVA compared with isotype control IgG administration. (E) E. coli CFU after infection for female C3+/–, C3–/–, virgin C3 NIMA, and C3 NIMA mice postpartum after pregnancy sired by C3–/– males. (F) GEq OVA DNA specific to OVA+ MMcs among female C3 OVA NIMA mice 20 days postpartum after pregnancy sired by C3–/– males compared with age-matched virgin control mice. Each point represents data from an individual mouse, combined from at least 2 independent experiments, each with similar results. Data indicate the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.005, ****P < 0.001, as determined by 1-way Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA test for comparing data containing more than 2 groups with nonuniform SD (B), 1-way ordinary ANOVA for comparing data containing more than 2 groups with similar SD (C and E), and unpaired Student’s t test when comparing 2 groups (D and F).

References

    1. Claas FH, et al. Induction of B cell unresponsiveness to noninherited maternal HLA antigens during fetal life. Science. 1988;241(4874):1815–1817. doi: 10.1126/science.3051377. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burlingham WJ, et al. The effect of tolerance to noninherited maternal HLA antigens on the survival of renal transplants from sibling donors. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(23):1657–1664. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392302. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stevens AM, et al. Myocardial-tissue-specific phenotype of maternal microchimerism in neonatal lupus congenital heart block. Lancet. 2003;362(9396):1617–1623. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14795-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson JL, et al. Maternal microchimerism in peripheral blood in type 1 diabetes and pancreatic islet beta cell microchimerism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(5):1637–1642. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606169104. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kinder JM, et al. Cross-generational reproductive fitness enforced by microchimeric maternal cells. Cell. 2015;162(3):505–515. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed