Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;48(12):3001-3013.
doi: 10.1002/wjs.12397. Epub 2024 Nov 14.

Clinicopathological predictive factors in long-term survivors who underwent surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A single-center propensity score matched analysis

Affiliations

Clinicopathological predictive factors in long-term survivors who underwent surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A single-center propensity score matched analysis

Carlo Ingaldi et al. World J Surg. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Long-term survivors (LTSs) after pancreatic resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represent a particular subgroup of patients that remains poorly understood. The primary endpoint was to identify clinicopathological factors associated with LTSs after pancreatic resection for PDAC.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients who had undergone pancreatic resection for PDAC. Long survival was defined as a patient who survived at least 60 months. Patients were divided in two groups: LTS and short-term survivor (STS). The two groups were compared regarding epidemiological, clinical, and pathological data. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias with a 1:2 ratio. Multivariable analysis of significative predictive factors before and after PSM was done.

Results: Three hundred and thirty-three patients were enrolled: 46 (13.8%) in the LTS group and 287 (86.2%) in the STS group. Using PSM, 138 patients were analyzed: 46 in the LTS group and 92 in the STS group. At the multivariate analysis of significative predictive factor after PSM, adjuvant chemotherapy, well-differentiated tumors (G1), and R0 status were related to long-term survival (p = 0.052, 0.010 and p = 0.019, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival curves confirmed these data. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that pathological stage I was a favorable factor with respect to stage II, III, and IV.

Conclusions: Long-term survival is possible after pancreatic cancer resection, even if in a small percentage. Significant predictors of long-term survival are administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, American Join Committee on Cancer stage I, well-differentiated tumor (G1), and R0 resection.

Keywords: long‐term survival; pancreatectomy; pancreatic cancer; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; predictive factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of the selection process. LTS, long‐term survivor; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PSM, propensity score matching; STS, short‐term survivor.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Survival analysis of all patients (n = 333) included in the study before PSM analysis: (A) survival analysis of all patients and regarding, (B) AJCC pathological stage, (C) R status, and (D) grading. AJCC, American Join Committee on Cancer.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Survival analysis of patients included in the study after PSM analysis: (A) survival analysis regarding R status, (B) AJCC pathological stage, (C) adjuvant chemotherapy, and (D) grading. AJCC, American Join Committee on Cancer.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aiom . 2021. I numeri del cancro in Italia 2021. Intermedia editore.
    1. Mizrahi, J. D. , Surana R., Valle J. W., and Shroff R. T.. 2020. “Pancreatic Cancer.” Lancet 395(10242): 2008–2020. 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30974-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barhli, A. , Cros J., Bartholin L., and Neuzillet C.. 2018. “Prognostic Stratification of Resected Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Past, Present and Future.” Digestive and Liver Disease 50(10): 979–990. 10.1016/j.dld.2018.08.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azam, F. , Latif M. F., Farooq A., Tirmazy S. H., AlShahrani S., Bashir S., and Bukhari N.. 2019. “Performance Status Assessment by Using ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Score for Cancer Patients by Oncology Healthcare Professionals.” Case Reports in Oncology 12(3): 728–736. 10.1159/000503095. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charlson, M. E. , Pompei P., Ales K. L., and MacKenzie C. R.. 1987. “A New Method of Classifying Prognostic Comorbidity in Longitudinal Studies: Development and Validation.” Journal of Chronic Diseases 40(5): 373–383. 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources