The BrEasT cancer afTER-CARE (BETTER-CARE) programme to improve breast cancer follow-up: design and feasibility study results of a cluster-randomised complex intervention trial
- PMID: 39543763
- PMCID: PMC11566082
- DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08614-8
The BrEasT cancer afTER-CARE (BETTER-CARE) programme to improve breast cancer follow-up: design and feasibility study results of a cluster-randomised complex intervention trial
Abstract
Background: The risk of breast cancer patients for long-term side effects of therapy such as neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity as well as late effects regarding comorbidities varies from individual to individual. Personalised follow-up care concepts that are tailored to individual needs and the risk of recurrences, side effects and late effects are lacking in routine care in Germany.
Methods: We describe the methodology of BETTER-CARE, a parallel-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial conducted at 15 intervention and 15 control centres, aiming to recruit 1140 patients, and the results of the pilot phase. The needs- and risk-adapted complex intervention, based on existing development frameworks, includes a multidisciplinary network and digital platforms for symptom and need documentation and just-in-time adaptive interventions. The control group comprises usual care according to clinical guidelines. The primary outcome is health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 global health), and secondary outcomes include treatment adherence.
Results: The 2-month pilot phase comprising 16 patients in one intervention and one control pilot centre demonstrated the feasibility of the BETTER-CARE approach.
Discussion: BETTER-CARE is a feasible intervention and study concept, investigating individualised needs- and risk-adapted breast cancer follow-up care in Germany. If successful, the approach could be implemented in German routine care.
Trial registration: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00028840. Registered on April 2022.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Complex intervention; Follow-up care; Pilot study; Study protocol.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Ca-a Cancer Journal For Clinicians. 2021;71(3):209–49. - PubMed
-
- Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten, Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V. Krebs in Deutschland für 2017/2018. Berlin: Robert-Koch-Institut; 2021. https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutsc....
-
- Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Niksic M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–75. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Fiszer C, Dolbeault S, Sultan S, Bredart A. Prevalence, intensity, and predictors of the supportive care needs of women diagnosed with breast cancer: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2014;23(4):361–74. - PubMed
-
- Faller H, Schuler M, Richard M, Heckl U, Weis J, Kuffner R. Effects of Psycho-Oncologic Interventions on Emotional Distress and Quality of Life in Adult Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(6):782–93. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous