Infection Risk Associated with High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Agents in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- PMID: 39547934
- DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3492
Infection Risk Associated with High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Agents in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), infections represent a significant concern, particularly given the immunomodulatory effects of disease-modifying agents (DMAs). High-efficacy DMAs (heDMAs) play a pivotal role in delaying MS progression, yet their use also raises concerns regarding the risk of infection. This study aimed to compare the infection risk with the use of heDMA and moderate-efficacy disease-modifying agents (meDMAs) in MS patients. This retrospective cohort study involved adult (18-64 years) MS patients with incident DMA use based on the 2015-2019 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. Patients initiating heDMAs (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab) or meDMAs (interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, and glatiramer acetate) were included. The outcomes of interest were comparative risk of overall infection, serious infection, and frequently reported types of infection. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were estimated in inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) based on Cox proportional hazard models. Among 10,003 eligible incident DMA users, 22.92% of patients initiated heDMAs. The IPTW-CPH model revealed that patients with heDMAs were associated with a higher risk of serious infection (aHR: 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.44) and urinary tract infection (UTI; aHR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.14-1.30). Sensitivity analyses with different follow-up periods yielded consistent findings with the main analyses. In MS, heDMAs were associated with a greater risk of serious infection and UTI compared with meDMAs. These findings suggest the need to carefully monitor and manage the infection risk to optimize the use of heDMAs in MS.
© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
References
-
- Hunter, S.F. Overview and diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Am J Manag Care 22, s141–s150 (2016).
-
- Kutzelnigg, A. & Lassmann, H. Pathology of multiple sclerosis and related inflammatory demyelinating diseases. Handb Clin Neurol 122, 15–58 (2014).
-
- McGinley, M.P., Goldschmidt, C.H. & Rae‐Grant, A.D. Diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. JAMA 325, 765–779 (2021).
-
- Wallin, M.T. et al. The prevalence of MS in the United States: a population‐based estimate using health claims data. Neurology 92, e1029–e1040 (2019).
-
- Williamson, E.M. & Berger, J.R. Infection risk in patients on multiple sclerosis therapeutics. CNS Drugs 29, 229–244 (2015).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials