YouTube as a source of education on tunneled catheter insertion: content and quality analysis
- PMID: 39548462
- PMCID: PMC11566733
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06330-0
YouTube as a source of education on tunneled catheter insertion: content and quality analysis
Abstract
Background: Tunneled catheters can be inserted for many reasons, and in most centers, and in most centers it is not clear who should insert these catheters. Some anesthesiologists may not have seen first-hand the insertion of a tunneled catheter during their residency, depending on the policies of the institution. YouTube is one of the most commonly used online platforms for accessing medical information. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of YouTube videos, for tunneled central venous catheter (Hickman and tunneled hemodialysis catheters) insertion for education.
Methods: The keywords "Tunneled catheter insertion" and "Tunneled central venous catheter insertion" were searched for on YouTube. The first 100 videos ranked by the YouTube algorithm were analysed. Animation and theoretical content videos, as well as videos that included only a part of the catheter insertion, were excluded. The sources of the videos were categorized as medical doctors or professional organizations. medical device advertisement and hospital. Two authors evaluated all videos via the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, modified DISCERN scores and the Global Quality Scale (GQS).
Results: Twenty-three videos were analysed in the study. The video quality scores were similar across the video sources. The number of views and the number of likes were significantly positively correlated. Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between the JAMA, Modified DISCERN, and GQS scores. Notably, none of the analysed videos achieved full points in all three scoring systems.
Conclusions: Relying on a single criterion, such as the video source or number of likes, is not sufficient to determine a video's quality. Therefore, what is learned from videos needs to be double-checked. These platforms should be used as an additional tool, not as the primary source of education.
Keywords: Central venous catheters; Continuing medical education; Online education; Vascular access devices; Video sharing networks; YouTube.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
YouTube as a source of education on piriformis injection: a content, quality, and reliability analysis.BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07154-2. BMC Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 40241034 Free PMC article.
-
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24. J Pediatr Urol. 2021. PMID: 33824069
-
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36211682 Free PMC article.
-
A quality assessment of YouTube content on shoulder instability.Phys Sportsmed. 2022 Aug;50(4):289-294. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2021.1942286. Epub 2021 Jun 24. Phys Sportsmed. 2022. PMID: 34121601 Review.
-
Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 19;22(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z. BMC Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 35590410 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
YouTube as a source of education on piriformis injection: a content, quality, and reliability analysis.BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07154-2. BMC Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 40241034 Free PMC article.
-
Celiac Disease in Children and YouTube: Do the Videos Contain Accurate Information?Turk Arch Pediatr. 2025 Jan 2;60(1):71-77. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24235. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2025. PMID: 39804093 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of health information in Chinese atopic dermatitis-related videos: A cross-sectional study.Digit Health. 2025 Jun 2;11:20552076251346579. doi: 10.1177/20552076251346579. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40463986 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Farag M, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N. Use of YouTube as a Resource for Surgical Education-Clarity or Confusion. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(3):445–9. - PubMed
-
- Barlas T, Ecem Avci D, Cinici B, Ozkilicaslan H, Muhittin Yalcin M, et al. The quality and reliability analysis of YouTube videos about insulin resistance. Int J Med Inform. 2023;170: 104960. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources