Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Mar;55(3):246-52.
doi: 10.1136/hrt.55.3.246.

Left ventricular function during isometric hand grip and cold stress in normal subjects

Left ventricular function during isometric hand grip and cold stress in normal subjects

R I Jones et al. Br Heart J. 1986 Mar.

Abstract

Both isometric exercise and cold stress have been suggested as alternatives to dynamic exercise for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. A non-imaging nuclear probe was used to measure left ventricular ejection fraction and relative left ventricular volumes continuously during both of these stress tests in 24 normal subjects. There was a significant fall in left ventricular ejection fraction within 15 seconds of subjects starting a two minute isometric hand grip test at 50% maximal voluntary contraction, with a mean (SE) maximal fall of 10% (1.8) after 90 seconds. During two minutes immersion of the hand and wrist in iced water left ventricular ejection fraction fell significantly within 30 seconds with a mean maximal fall of 7% (1.7) after one minute. Nine subjects underwent repeat tests under identical conditions approximately two weeks later. The standard error of the change in ejection fraction on two occasions was 5.4% at rest, 7.0% at the peak of isometric exercise, and 4.8% at peak cold stress. These results indicate that the reproducibility of both of these stress tests is acceptable when they are performed under carefully controlled conditions. The resulting changes in ejection fraction are transient, however, and moreover depend upon the choice of stress protocol. The discrepancies between published reports of such studies in coronary artery disease may be mainly due to methodological differences, and neither test is likely to be of sufficient discriminative ability to distinguish between individuals with obstructive coronary artery disease and normal subjects.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Cardiol. 1972 Jul 11;30(1):48-54 - PubMed
    1. Br Heart J. 1984 Oct;52(4):422-30 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1975 Jun;35(6):785-94 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1976 Dec 9;295(24):1333-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1978 Mar;41(3):531-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources