Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Nov-Dec;18(6):e893-e904.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.07.013. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

Safety and efficacy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Safety and efficacy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis

Francinny Alves Kelly et al. J Clin Lipidol. 2024 Nov-Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), affects approximately 18.6 million individuals worldwide and poses a significant healthcare related challenge. Despite the established efficacy of both high-intensity statin monotherapy (HIS) and moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe (MIS+EZT) in ASCVD management, the optimal treatment strategy remains unclear.

Methods: A thorough literature study was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases, focusing on studies that compared the effects of MIS+EZT with HIS monotherapy in ASCVD patients.

Results: In the 13 included studies, involving 8,592 patients, 4,525 (52.67%) of which received moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe treatment. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 156 weeks, with participant ages varying from 55.2 to 71 years old. Analysis revealed that MIS+EZT was associated with a significantly greater percentage of patients who achieved the goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL. (odds ratio [OR] 1.76; 95% CI [1.26; 2.45]; p = 0.001; I² = 73%); LDL-C reduction (mean difference [MD] -5.05 mg/dL; 95% CI [-9.02;-1.07]; p < 0.013; I² = 56%); total cholesterol reduction (MD -7.91 mg/ dL; 95% CI [-14.90; -0.91]; p < 0.027; I² = 60%) and triglyceride reduction (MD -8.20 mg/ dL; 95% CI [-13.05; -3.35]; p < 0.001; I² = 2%). There was no statistical difference between groups in drug adverse reaction (risk ratio [RR] 1.19; 95% CI [0.79; 1.78]; p = 0.404; I² = 0%) and drug intolerance (RR 0.78; 95% CI [0.32; 1.92]; p = 0.584; I² = 35%).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis highlights the effectiveness of MIS+EZT in significantly improving lipid profile components for ASCVD patients, as can been seen through the greater percentage of patients achieving the LDL-C < 70 mg/dL target and lower LDL-C, total cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Importantly, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of overall adverse events and adverse drug reactions between the two groups.

Keywords: ASCVD; Ezetimibe; High-intensity statins; Moderate-intensity statins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources