Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):6099-6122.
doi: 10.1002/sim.10252. Epub 2024 Nov 17.

Statistical Inference for Box-Cox based Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves

Affiliations

Statistical Inference for Box-Cox based Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves

Leonidas E Bantis et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis is widely used in evaluating the effectiveness of a diagnostic test/biomarker or classifier score. A parametric approach for statistical inference on ROC curves based on a Box-Cox transformation to normality has frequently been discussed in the literature. Many investigators have highlighted the difficulty of taking into account the variability of the estimated transformation parameter when carrying out such an analysis. This variability is often ignored and inferences are made by considering the estimated transformation parameter as fixed and known. In this paper, we will review the literature discussing the use of the Box-Cox transformation for ROC curves and the methodology for accounting for the estimation of the Box-Cox transformation parameter in the context of ROC analysis, and detail its application to a number of problems. We present a general framework for inference on any functional of interest, including common measures such as the AUC, the Youden index, and the sensitivity at a given specificity (and vice versa). We further developed a new R package (named 'rocbc') that carries out all discussed approaches and is available in CRAN.

Keywords: Box–Cox; ROC; correlated biomarkers; delta method; sensitivity; smooth ROC; specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Somoza E, Mossman D and McFeeters L. The info-roc technique: a method for comparing and optimizing inspection systems. Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation Springer, 1990, pp. 601–608.
    1. Nockemann C, Heidt H and Thomsen N. Reliability in ndt: Roc study of radiographic weld inspections. NDT & E International 1991; 24 (5): 235–245.
    1. Hirschfeld G and Thielsch MT. Establishing meaningful cut points for online user ratings. Ergonomics 2015; 58 (2): 310–320. - PubMed
    1. Srihari SN and Srinivasan H. Comparison of roc and likelihood decision methods in automatic fingerprint verification.International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 2008; 22 (03): 535–553.
    1. Maloney KO, Cole JC and Schmid M. Predicting thermally stressful events in rivers with a strategy to evaluate management alternatives. River Research and Applications 2016; 32 (7): 1428–1437.