Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 17;8(1):264.
doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00757-w.

Targeting ErbB and tankyrase1/2 prevent the emergence of drug-tolerant persister cells in ALK-positive lung cancer

Affiliations

Targeting ErbB and tankyrase1/2 prevent the emergence of drug-tolerant persister cells in ALK-positive lung cancer

Takaaki Fujimura et al. NPJ Precis Oncol. .

Abstract

Targeting the drug tolerant persister (DTP) state in cancer cells should prevent further development of resistance mechanisms. This study explored combination therapies to inhibit alectinib-induced DTP cell formation from anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer (ALK + NSCLC) patient-derived cells. After drug-screening 3114 compounds, pan-HER inhibitors (ErbB pathway) and tankyrase1/2 inhibitors (Wnt/β-catenin signaling) emerged as top candidates to inhibit alectinib-induced DTP cells growth. We confirmed knockdown of both TNKS1/2 in DTP cells recovered the sensitivity to alectinib. Further, our study suggested knockdown of TNKS1/2 increased stability of Axin1/2, which induced β-catenin degradation and decreased its nuclear translocation, thereby suppressing transcription of antiapoptotic and proliferation-related genes (survivin, c-MYC). Targeting both pathways with alectinib+pan-HER inhibitor and alectinib+TNKS1/2 inhibitor suppressed alectinib-induced DTP cells, and the triple combination almost completely prevented the appearance of DTP cells. In conclusion, combination with ALK-TKI, pan-HER and TNKS1/2 inhibitors has the potential to prevent the emergence of DTP in ALK + NSCLC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests T.F., S.Y., K.F. and H.M. are employees of Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and declare no conflict of interest. S.M. and J.A. declare no conflict of interest. M.N. received honoraria for lectures from Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Nippon Kayaku, Taiho Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Merck, Janssen. E.M. received grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lily Japan, and honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Otsuka pharmaceutical, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Eli Lilly Japan, Nippon Kayaku, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Sysmex, Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, MSD, Novartis, Kyowa Kirin, Merck, and participated on Advisory Board of Chugai Pharmaceutical, Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, Eli Lilly Japan, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo, Ono Pharmaceutical. K.U. received honoraria for lectures from Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck. H.H. received support from Guardant Health Japan, and grants from IQVIA Services JAPAN, SYNEOS HEALTH CLINICAL, EPS, Nippon Kayaku, Takeda Pharmaceutical, MSD, Amgen, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen Pharmaceutical, CMIC, Pfizer R&D Japan, Labcorp Development Japan, Kobayashi Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, Eisai, EP-CRSU, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Otsuka pharmaceutical, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, SRL Medisearch, PRA Health Sciences, Astellas Pharma, Ascent Development Services, Bayer Yakuhin, and honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Pfizer Japan, Boehringer-Ingelheim Japan, Merck Biopharma, 3H Clinical Trial, Novartis Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Sysmex, Takeda Pharmaceutical. Dr. Ryohei Katayama is an Associate Editor for npj Precision Oncology, and received research grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical and TOPPAN Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Preparation and characterization of ALK1510-c4 DTP cells from ALK1510-c4 cells.
a ALK1510-c4 DTP cells were generated from ALK1510-c4 cells after treatment with 1000 nM alectinib for 9 days, ALK1510-c4 regrown cells were generated from ALK1510-c4 DTP cells cultured in alectinib-free cell culture for 37 days, and comparison with ALK1510-c4 cell controls were assessed in a cell proliferation assay (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments, *P < 0.05 between ALK1510-c4 and ALK1510-c4 DTP and ALK1510-c4 regrown; Tukey’s HSD test). b Immunoblots of cell lysates showing changes in phosphorylated and/or total ALK, AKT, ERK, STAT3, and cleaved PARP in ALK1510-c4 cells treated with 1000 nM alectinib for 1, 3, 24, and 48 h and 9 days. c Immunoblots of cell lysates showing changes in BIM, stem cell marker CD133, vimentin, and E-cadherin protein levels in ALK1510-c4 cells and ALK1510-c4 DTP cells. d Immunoblots of cell lysates showing change in phosphorylated and/or total ALK, AKT, ERK and STAT3 protein levels in ALK1510-c4 cells and ALK1510-c4 DTP cells after treatment with 1000 nM alectinib for 1 h. Microscopic examination of ALK1510-c4 parental and DTP cells generated from ALK1510-c4 by treatment with 1000 nM alectinib for 9 days with phase contrast (e), and crystal violet staining (f). g Immunoblots of cell lysates in ALK1510-c4 DTP cells after 13 and 26 days culture in the alectinib-free medium.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Screening the compound library to identify drugs with specific growth rate (ALK1510-c4 DTP cells/ALK1510-c4 cells).
a ALK1510-c4 cells and ALK1510-c4 DTP cells were cultured with each of the 3114 compounds in an anticancer drug compound library (n = 1). Antiproliferative effects on ALK1510-c4 DTP cells relative to ALK1510-c4 cells are plotted as ratios in an ascending order for each compound by evaluating cell viability of the respective cells. b Top ten compounds with antiproliferative effects on ALK1510-c4 DTP cells relative to ALK1510-c4 cells are tabulated. c Cell proliferation assay/cytostatic studies showing relative cell viability/difference in drug sensitivity of ALK1510-c4 cells and ALK1510-c4 DTP cells after treatment with dacomitinib, neratinib, AZ6102, G007-LK, LY2090314, and omecamtiv mecarbil; mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments, *P < 0.05 between ALK1510-c4 and ALK1510-c4 DTP ; Student’s t test).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Evaluation of ErbB signaling in ALK1510-c4 cells using alectinib and ALK1510-c4 DTP cells treated with pan-HER inhibitor dacomitinib.
a Immunoblots of cell lysates evaluating ErbB signaling molecules from ALK1510-c4 cells treated with 1000 nM alectinib for 1, 3, 24, and 48 h and 9 days. b Relative HER2 phosphorylation levels in ALK1510-c4 cells to nontreated controls described in Fig. 3a were measured by ELISA (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments). c Relative EGFR phosphorylation levels of ALK1510-c4 cells to total EGFR protein levels using cells described in Fig. 3a quantified by densitometric analysis with Sally Sue™. d Immunoblots of cell lysates from ALK1510-c4 DTP cells evaluating ErbB signaling and ALK signaling after treatment with 10, 100, and 1000 nM dacomitinib for 3 h. e Relative HER2 phosphorylation levels of ALK1510-c4 DTP cells described in Fig. 3d were measured by ELISA (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Efficacy and characterization of the combination of alectinib with pan-HER inhibitors on ALK1510-c4 cells.
a Cell proliferation assay of ALK1510-c4 cells cultured with alectinib, lorlatinib, dacomitinib, and neratinib; and alectinib or lorlatinib in combination with dacomitinib or neratinib (100 nM and 300 nM) (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments, *P < 0.05 between ALK-TKI single treatment and combination treatment; Dunnett’s test). b ALK1510-c4 cells cultured with alectinib, dacomitinib, or alectinib + dacomitinib (100 nM and 300 nM) were evaluated for caspase-3/7 activity relative to vehicle-treated cells (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments). c Immunoblots of cell lysates evaluating ErbB and ALK downstream signaling in ALK1510-c4 cells treated with 1000 nM alectinib, 100 nM dacomitinib, and their combination for 24 h. d Cell proliferation assay of ALK1510-c4 cells transfected with three siRNAs against EGFR, HER2, and HER3, or a nontarget control siRNA and treated with alectinib or lorlatinib (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments, *P < 0.05 between ALK-TKI + siCtrl and ALK-TKI + siPan-HER; Student’s t test). e Immunoblots of cell lysates from ALK1510-c4 cells described in Fig. 4d treated with 1000 nM alectinib for 48 h. f Mean (SD) change in tumor volume in mice bearing ALK1510-c4 cells xenograft tumors treated with vehicle, 2 mg/kg alectinib, 10 mg/kg dacomitinib, or their combination for 14 days (P < 0.05 versus vehicle (a), alectinib (b) and dacomitinib (c); Wilcoxon rank sum test by the Holm–Bonferroni method; n = 8 mice per group). g Immunoblots of tumor lysates from ALK1510-c4 cells xenograft tumors in mice treated with vehicle, alectinib (2 mg/kg), or alectinib (2 mg/kg) + dacomitinib (10 mg/kg) combination for 2 days. h Body weight change in mice relative to the start of the treatment in Fig. 4f.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Characterization of TNKS1/2 pathway in ALK1510-c4 cells and ALK1510-c4 DTP cells.
a The relative mRNA expression of TNKS1 and TNKS2 (TNKS1/2) in ALK1510-c4 cells and ALK1510-c4 DTP cells determined by RT-PCR (using the TaqMan probes) was calculated as the ratio of the normalized value (with GAPDH mRNA expression) (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments; *P < 0.05 versus ALK1510-c4 cells; Dunnett’s test). b Immunoblots of cell lysates evaluating Wnt/β-catenin signaling in ALK1510-c4 cells treated with 1000 nM alectinib for 1, 3, 24, and 48 h and 9 days. c Immunoblots of cytosolic or nuclear lysates from ALK1510-c4 cells treated with 1000 nM alectinib for 24 h and 9 days.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Efficacy in cell-based assay and characterization of TNKS1/2 inhibitors in ALK1510-c4 cells.
a Cell proliferation assay of ALK1510-c4 cells cultured with alectinib, lorlatinib, AZ6102, or G007-LK singly, or alectinib or lorlatinib in combination with AZ6102 or G007-LK (100 nM or 300 nM) (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments, *P < 0.05 between ALK-TKI single treatment and combination treatment; Dunnett’s test). b The relative mRNA expression of TNKS1/2 in ALK1510-c4 cells treated with 1000 nM alectinib was determined by RT-PCR (using the TaqMan probes) and calculated as the ratio of the normalized value with GAPDH mRNA expression (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments, *P < 0.05 versus siCtrl; Dunnett’s test). c Cell proliferation assay of ALK1510-c4 cells transfected with two siRNAs against TNKS1, TNKS2, or a nontarget control siRNA and cultured with alectinib or lorlatinib (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments, *P < 0.05 among siCtrl, siTNKS1, siTNKS2 and siTNKS1/2; Tukey’s HSD test). d Immunoblots assessing Wnt/β-catenin signaling molecules from cell lysates of ALK1510-c4 cells described in Fig. 6b treated with 1000 nM alectinib for 48 h.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Efficacy in animal model and characterization of TNKS1/2 inhibitors in ALK1510-c4 cells.
a Assessment of caspase-3/7 activity in ALK1510-c4 cells cultured with alectinib, AZ6102, and the combination of alectinib and AZ6102 (100 nM or 300 nM) relative to caspase-3/7 activity in vehicle-treated cells (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments). b Immunoblots assessing Wnt/β-catenin signaling molecules from cell lysates of ALK1510-c4 cells treated with alectinib (1000 nM), AZ6102 (100 nM), or their combination for 48 h. c Mean (SD) change in tumor volume in mice bearing xenograft tumors with ALK1510-c4 cells and treated with vehicle, 2 mg/kg alectinib, 10 mg/kg or 50 mg/kg of G007-LK, or their combinations for 14 days (P < 0.05 versus vehicle (a), alectinib (b) and corresponding dose of G007-LK (c); Wilcoxon rank sum test by the Holm–Bonferroni method; n = 6 mice per group). d Change in body weight from baseline of mice treated with vehicle, alectinib (2 mg/kg), G007-LK (10 mg/kg and 50 mg/kg), and a combination of alectinib (2 mg/kg) and G007-LK (10 mg/kg or 50 mg/kg). e Immunoblots of tumor lysates from mice bearing xenograft tumors with ALK1510-c4 cells and treated with alectinib (2 mg/kg), or a combination of alectinib (2 mg/kg) and G007-LK (10 mg/kg) for 2 days.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. Efficacy and characterization of triple combination therapy in ALK1510-c4 cells and animal models.
a Relative cell viability of ALK1510-c4 cells cultured with alectinib, alectinib with dacomitinib (100 nM), alectinib with AZ6102 (100 nM), and a triple combination of alectinib + dacomitinib + AZ6102 (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments, *P < 0.05 between doublet treatment and alectinib + dacomitinib + AZ6102 treatment; Dunnett’s test). b Caspase-3/7 activity relative to vehicle treatment was assessed in ALK1510-c4 cells treatment with the drugs described in Fig. 8a (mean [SD] of n = 3 experiments). c Immunoblots of cell lysates from ALK1510-c4 cells described in Fig. 8a after treatment for 24 h. d Mean (SD) change in tumor volume of mice bearing xenograft tumors with ALK1510-c4 cells and treated with vehicle, alectinib (2 mg/kg) + dacomitinib (10 mg/kg), alectinib (2 mg/kg) + G007-LK (10 mg/kg), and their triple combination for 14 days (P < 0.05 versus alectinib + dacomitinib (a) or versus alectinib + G007-LK (b) ; Wilcoxon rank sum test by the Holm–Bonferroni method; n = 8 mice per group). e Immunoblots of tumor lysates evaluating ALK-signaling and Wnt/β-catenin-signaling from xenograft tumors with ALK1510-c4 cells in mice treated with alectinib, alectinib + dacomitinib, alectinib + G007-LK, and their triple combination for 2 days. f Mean (SD) change from baseline in body weight of mice described in Fig. 8d. g ALK1510-c4 cells were treated with vehicle, alectinib (1000 nM), alectinib in combination with dacomitinib (100 nM) or AZ6102 (100 nM); and a triple combination of alectinib + dacomitinib + AZ6102 for 5 weeks, and then washed after 5 weeks. Cell numbers were measured using a cell counter at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 11. If the cell number was 1 × 104 or less, it was indicated and considered a limitation of the cell counter. The cell counts were terminated at the point (†) when ALK1510-c4 cells detached from the culture flask due to over-confluence (n = 1). h ALK1510-c4 cells were sequentially treated with alectinib (1000 nM) in combination with dacomitinib (100 nM) or AZ6102 (100 nM), and a triple combination of alectinib + dacomitinib + AZ6102 for 5 weeks (left). Cell numbers were measured using a cell counter at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 (right). If the cell number was 1 × 104 or less, it was indicated and considered a limitation of the cell counter (n = 1).

References

    1. Singh, A. & Chen, H. Optimal Care for Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review on the Role and Utility of ALK Inhibitors. Cancer Manag. Res.12, 6615–6628 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang, S. S., Nagasaka, M., Zhu, V. W. & Ou, S. I. Going beneath the tip of the iceberg. Identifying and understanding EML4-ALK variants and TP53 mutations to optimize treatment of ALK fusion positive (ALK+) NSCLC. Lung Cancer158, 126–136 (2021). - PubMed
    1. Wang, L. & Wang, W. Safety and efficacy of anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non‑small cell lung cancer (Review). Oncol. Rep.45, 13–28 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Camidge, D. R. et al. Updated Efficacy and Safety Data and Impact of the EML4-ALK Fusion Variant on the Efficacy of Alectinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Global Phase III ALEX Study. J. Thorac. Oncol.14, 1233–1243 (2019). - PubMed
    1. Hida, T. et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet390, 29–39 (2017). - PubMed