Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug 6:17585732241269807.
doi: 10.1177/17585732241269807. Online ahead of print.

Characteristics of rehabilitation protocols following operative treatment of terrible triad elbow injuries and the influence of early motion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Joseph Larwa  1 , Timothy R Buchanan  2 , Rachel L Janke  3 , Madison Q Burns  4 , Logan Wright  2 , Kevin A Hao  2 , Robert J Cueto  2 , Keegan M Hones  5 , William R Aibinder  6 , Thomas W Wright  5 , Bradley S Schoch  7 , Joseph J King  5
Affiliations
Review

Characteristics of rehabilitation protocols following operative treatment of terrible triad elbow injuries and the influence of early motion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Joseph Larwa et al. Shoulder Elbow. .

Abstract

Background: As no consensus exists on the optimal postoperative rehabilitation protocol in terrible triad injuries, we sought to characterize the reported protocols and relate them to postoperative range of motion (ROM) measures and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles on the operative treatment of terrible triad injuries reporting postoperative rehabilitation protocols were included. Included studies were descriptively summarized. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies criteria. Meta-analysis compared postoperative ROM measures and the MEPS between patients initiating passive ROM exercises at ≤7 days vs. >7 days.

Results: Our review included 36 articles with 1123 elbows (66% male, mean age: 43 years, follow-up: 27 months). Of the studies reporting physical therapy protocols, it was most commonly initiated at 7 days postoperatively (6/36, 17%), passive ROM exercises at 7 days (3/25, 12%), and active ROM at 21 days (4/26, 15%). On meta-analysis, early passive ROM initiation was not associated with improved elbow ROM or MEPS.

Discussion: While rehabilitation protocols commonly advised passive ROM at one week post-operatively, meta-analysis did not support functional benefits of early passive ROM.

Study design: Systematic Review; Level of evidence, 4.

Keywords: Upper extremity; complex elbow fracture dislocation; elbow fracture; physical therapy; rehabilitation; terrible triad.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: K.A.H. has a consultancy agreement with LinkBio Corp. W.R.A. is a consultant for Exactech, Inc. T.W.W. is a paid consultant and receive royalties from Exactech, Inc. B.S.S. receives royalties from Exactech, Innomed and Responsive Arthroscopy. J.J.K. is a paid consultant for Exactech, Inc. and LinkBio Corp. The other authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flowchart of the study selection criteria.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) time for non-weight bearing (NWB) status, (B) time to unlimited or full active range of motion (ROM), (C) time to passive ROM, (D) time to active ROM, (E) time to elbow strengthening, (F) time to no restrictions.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Comparison of postoperative range of motion measures based on early (≤7 days) versus late (>7 days) initiation of passive motion exercises (A) elbow flexion, (B) elbow extension, (C) elbow flexion-extension arc.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Comparison of postoperative range of motion measures based on early (≤7 days) versus late (>7 days) initiation of passive motion exercises (A) elbow pronation, (B) elbow supination, (C) elbow pronation-supination arc.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Comparison of postoperative Mayo elbow performance scores (MEPS) based on early (≤7 days) versus late (>7 days) initiation of passive motion exercises.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
(A) Time to start physical therapy (PT), (B) time to start formal PT when used in isolation, (C) time to start formal PT when used in combination with a home exercise program (HEP), (D) time to start HEP when used in combination with formal PT.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
(A) Time spent in a cast or splint. (B) Time spent in a brace.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hotchkiss R. Fractures and dislocations of the elbow. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
    1. Wyrick JD, Dailey SK, Gunzenhaeuser JM, et al. Management of complex elbow dislocations: a mechanistic approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2015; 23: 297–306. - PubMed
    1. Chan K, King GJW, Faber KJ. Treatment of complex elbow fracture-dislocations. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2016; 9: 185–189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tashjian RZ, Katarincic JA. Complex elbow instability. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006; 14: 278–286. - PubMed
    1. Waterworth R, Finlayson G, Franklin M, et al. Current concepts in the management of ‘Terrible Triad’ injuries of the elbow. Injury 2023; 54: 110889. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources