Do threats and reassurances reside in the biological, psychological or social domain? A qualitative study in adults and young people with chronic pain

Abstract

Objective: Understanding biopsychosocial contributions to a sensitised pain system is a key target of many pain management programs. The 'Protectometer' is a freely available educational tool that guides people with chronic pain to explore their personal threats and reassurances, identifying them as 'DIMs' (danger in me) or 'SIMs' (safety in me), to guide personalised pain management. This study aimed to explore common types of DIMs and SIMs, and examine differences between adults and young people.

Materials and methods: A retrospective qualitative study was conducted. Written DIMs (n = 504) and SIMs (n = 711) were collected from 96 participants with chronic pain (77 adults aged 18-85 years; 19 young people aged 9-17 years) across 15 multidisciplinary pain management groups. DIMs and SIMs were transcribed and analysed using deductive content analysis.

Results: Four overarching themes were identified: 'Engaging with the environment', 'In my body', 'My emotional health', and 'Activities and behaviours'. Similarities in SIMs were found, with the greatest proportion of SIMs in the social domain (49% adults; 47% young people). While adult DIMs were fairly evenly spread across the biological (37%), psychological (27%) and social domains (36%), young people's DIMs were predominantly in the psychological (44%) and social (43%) domains.

Discussion: These findings provide insights into common threats and reassurances people in pain perceive, and revealed age-related differences in biopsychosocial contributions to pain and pain relief. Findings also highlight the importance of social-based interventions as part of pain management therapies for both adults and young people.

Keywords: Biopsychosocial; children; education; pain management.

Figure 1.

Proportions of DIMs and SIMs in biological, psychological and social domains for adults (outer ring) and young people (inner ring).

Figure 2.

Frequency and rank of DIMs (Panel A) and SIMs (Panel B) categories for adults (left) and young people (right). Categories are ordered by descending frequency for adults.