Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71684.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.71684. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Comparative Effectiveness of Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Versus Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis

Leena Saeed et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in individuals with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with obesity. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to September 15, 2024. Four observational studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed, comprising a total of 247,000 patients. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The results showed that BMS was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE compared to GLP-1RAs (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.90, p = 0.004), indicating a 29% reduction in MACE risk. Additionally, BMS demonstrated a 25% reduction in all-cause mortality risk (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.87, p < 0.0001). These findings suggest that BMS offers superior cardiovascular protection and improved survival outcomes compared to GLP-1RAs in obese patients. The observed benefits may be attributed to more significant reductions in body mass index (BMI) and improvements in metabolic parameters achieved through surgical intervention. However, the limitations of this study, including its observational nature and the limited number of included studies, underscore the need for further research, particularly randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to confirm these findings and guide clinical decision-making in obesity management.

Keywords: bariatric metabolic surgery; cardiovascular outcomes; glp-1 receptor agonists; meta-analysis; mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart
PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of cardiovascular events between surgery and GLP-1RAs
References: Adekolu et al. [18], Dicker et al. [19], Stenberg et al. [20], and Stenberg et al. [21] GLP-1RAs: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of all-cause mortality between surgery and GLP-1RAs
References: Dicker et al. [19] and Stenberg et al. [21] GLP-1RAs: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

References

    1. Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: have all risk factors the same strength? Martín-Timón I, Sevillano-Collantes C, Segura-Galindo A, Del Cañizo-Gómez FJ. World J Diabetes. 2014;5:444–470. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diabetes prevalence in Sweden at present and projections for year 2050. Andersson T, Ahlbom A, Carlsson S. PLoS One. 2015;10:0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Critical correlation between obesity and cardiovascular diseases and recent advancements in obesity. Pakhare M, Anjankar A. Cureus. 2024;16:0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pharmacotherapy of obesity: an update on the available medications and drugs under investigation. Chakhtoura M, Haber R, Ghezzawi M, Rhayem C, Tcheroyan R, Mantzoros CS. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(23)00059.... EClinicalMedicine. 2023;58:101882. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cardiovascular protective properties of GLP-1 receptor agonists: more than just diabetic and weight loss drugs. Le R, Nguyen MT, Allahwala MA, Psaltis JP, Marathe CS, Marathe JA, Psaltis PJ. J Clin Med. 2024;13:4674. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources