Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 4;6(1):vdae169.
doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae169. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Biological and prognostic relevance of epigenetic regulatory genes in high-grade gliomas

Affiliations

Biological and prognostic relevance of epigenetic regulatory genes in high-grade gliomas

Sonikpreet Aulakh et al. Neurooncol Adv. .

Abstract

Background: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are the most aggressive type of gliomas and have the poorest outcomes. Chromatin remodeling (CR) genes have been implicated in multiple oncogenic pathways in numerous cancer types. In gliomagenesis, CR genes have been implicated in regulating the stemness of glioma cells, the tumor microenvironment (TME), and resistance to therapies.

Methods: We performed molecular profiling of 4244 HGGs and evaluated associations of CR mutations with other cancer-related biomarkers, infiltration by immune cells, and immune gene expression. We also evaluated the association between CR mutations and survival in wild-type IDH HGG patients.

Results: Nearly 10% of HGGs carry mutations in CR genes, with a higher prevalence (15%) in HGGs with IDH mutations. Analysis of cooccurrence with other biomarkers revealed that CR-mutated HGGs possess favorable genetic alterations which may have prognostic value. CR-mutated HGGs with wild-type IDH demonstrated colder TME and worse OS overall compared to the CR-wild-type HGGs.

Conclusions: Our study reveals the prognostic effects of CR mutations in HGG and points to several biomarker candidates that could suggest sensitivity to emerging therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: chromatin remodeling; clinical oncology; glioma; molecular oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.S. discloses a conflict of interest as a consultant with Tempus and speakers’ bureau for Novocure; J.X, A.H., and D.S. are employed at Caris Life Sciences; S.D. discloses honoraria from OncoLens, BostonGene and advisory role at Bayer; M.J.D. discloses advisory roles at Bayer, Loxo/Lilly, OnCusp Therapeutics, Orphagen Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, TD2, Crinetics, and Theralink; S.S. discloses advisory roles at Novocure and Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) at Bexion; S.K. discloses stock and other ownership Interests in xcures; S.K. discloses honoraria from Jubilant Biosys and Pyramid Biosciences; S.K. discloses advisory roles at Biocept, iCAD, and xcures; S.K. discloses research funding from AIVITA Biomedical, Inc., Bayer, Biocept, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Biomedical, Caris MPI, CNS pharmaceuticals, EpicentRx, Lilly, Oblato, and Orbus therapeutics; D.M.A. discloses stock and other ownership Interests in Diverse Biotech and MAIA Biotechnology; D.M.A. discloses advisory roles at Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine and MAIA Biotechnology; D.M.A discloses patents, royalties, and other Intellectual Property - Methods for predicting tumor response to immunotherapy, U.S. Provisional application no. 62/787,508 filed January 2, 2019 Methods for predicting tumor response to immunotherapy, U.S. Provisional application no. 62/620,577 filed January 23, 2018; A.L.S. discloses stock and other ownership Interests in Novocure; A.L.S. discloses honoraria from Cardinal Health, Curio Science, and Gerson Lehrman Group; A.L.S. discloses advisory roles at Abbvie, Amgen, Athenex, Bayer, Exelixis, Merck, and Novocure; A.L.S. discloses speaker’s bureau at Abbvie; Bayer; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Exelixis; Merck; Novocure; Prime Oncology; A.L.S. discloses research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Kura Oncology, Novocure, and Oncoceutics; A.L.S. discloses travel and accommodation expenses from American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novocure, and Xcenda; M.J.G. discloses advisory role at Biocept; M.J.G. discloses research funding from cns pharmaceuticals, Denovo Biopharma, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Five Prime Therapeutics, Genentech, ImmunoCellular Therapeutics, Ono Pharmaceutical, RTOG, Sunovion, Triphase Accelerator Corp, and Vascular Biogenics; The rest of the authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cohort selection diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Molecular differences in chromatin remodeling (CR)-mut versus CR-WT high-grade gliomas. (A) Glioblastoma, IDH-WT and (B) Astrocytoma, IDH-mut. Shown are alterations occurring in ≥0.5% of tumors with a q < .05 when the CR-mut group for all CR genes is compared to the CR-WT group. Subgroups of the CR-mut cohort are sorted into classes of CR genes: SWI/SNF, histone methyltransferase (HM), and other (DNA methyltransferase, histone acetyltransferase, histone demethylase, transcriptional coactivator). *Due to the high GC-rich region in the TERT promoter, mutation rates in this gene were manually scored.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Association of chromatin remodeling (CR) mutations with TME in glioblastoma, IDH-WT. (A) Immune cell populations in CR-WT compared to CR-mut. (B) Immune cell populations in CR-WT compared to classes of classes of CR genes: SWI/SNF, histone methyltransferase (HM), and others. (C) Expression of selected immune-related genes in CR-WT compared to CR-mut and CR-WT compared to CR-mut gene classes. (D) IFN score in CR-WT compared to CR-mut and CR-WT compared to CR-mut gene classes. Brackets and asterisks indicate statistical significance; red and black colors indicate P-values and q-values, respectively. *<.05; **<.01; ***<.001; and ****<.0001.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Association of chromatin remodeling (CR) mutations with TME in astrocytoma, IDH-mut. (A) Immune cell populations in CR-WT compared to CR-mut. (B) Immune cell populations in CR-WT compared to classes of CR genes: SWI/SNF, histone methyltransferase (HM), and others. (C) Expression of selected immune-related genes in CR-WT compared to CR-mut and CR-WT compared to CR-mut gene classes. (D) IFN score in CR-WT compared to CR-mut and CR-WT compared to CR-mut gene classes. Brackets and asterisks indicate statistical significance; red and black colors indicate P-values and q-values, respectively. *<.05; **<.01; ***<.001; and ****<.0001.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Survival in HGG patients with or without CR mutations. (A) Kaplan–Meier estimate of survival in CR-mut versus CR-WT in glioblastoma, IDH-WT. (B) Multivariate analysis of glioblastoma, IDH-WT with corrections for CR-mutations, gender, EGFR amplification, trisomy 7 and monosomy 10 (+7/−10), TMZ treatment, age, and MGMT methylation status.

References

    1. Molinaro AM, Taylor JW, Wiencke JK, Wrensch MR.. Genetic and molecular epidemiology of adult diffuse glioma. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(7):405–417. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(8):1231–1251. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher JP, Adamson DC.. Current FDA-approved therapies for high-grade malignant gliomas. Biomedicines. 2021;9(3):324. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centore RC, Sandoval GJ, Soares LMM, Kadoch C, Chan HM.. Mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes: Emerging mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Trends Genet. 2020;36(12):936–950. - PubMed
    1. Ribeiro-Silva C, Vermeulen W, Lans H.. SWI/SNF: Complex complexes in genome stability and cancer. DNA Repair (Amst). 2019;77(May):87–95. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources